Core Viewpoint - The judicial bureau of Qiannan Prefecture has made significant progress in legal governance and public legal services during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, emphasizing the integration of law into economic and social development, and achieving recognition as a national model for legal governance [11][12][13]. Group 1: Legal Governance Achievements - Qiannan Prefecture has established itself as a national model for legal governance, being the only ethnic autonomous prefecture to receive this honor among 30 such regions in China [13]. - The prefecture has implemented various legal governance measures, including the "Six Musts and Six Prohibitions" to standardize administrative behavior, leading to improved public safety and satisfaction ratings [13][14]. - The judicial bureau has conducted 39 legal workshops and trained over 9,000 officials, enhancing their ability to apply legal thinking in governance [12]. Group 2: Administrative Legislation and Regulation - The prefecture has developed a comprehensive legislative framework, completing 4 legislative projects and revising 4 regulations focused on key areas such as environmental protection and social governance [15][16]. - A total of 443 administrative normative documents were issued, with a 100% compliance rate for legality reviews and filings [16]. - The establishment of a robust administrative decision-making process has led to a 100% public participation rate in major decisions, enhancing transparency and accountability [16]. Group 3: Administrative Law Enforcement - The integration of administrative law enforcement teams has improved efficiency, with the establishment of 3 state-level and 94 county-level teams [18]. - The prefecture has implemented a comprehensive administrative enforcement supervision system, ensuring compliance and addressing issues such as arbitrary fines and inspections [19]. - Training programs for law enforcement personnel have been enhanced, leading to improved professional standards and public trust in law enforcement [19]. Group 4: Criminal Justice and Community Corrections - The prefecture has maintained a high standard in drug rehabilitation facilities, achieving a "six no" target for 23 consecutive years [21]. - Community correction measures have been effectively implemented, with a recidivism rate below the provincial average for two consecutive years [22]. - The prefecture has established 1,751 mediation organizations, achieving a 95.5% success rate in dispute resolution [22]. Group 5: Public Legal Services - Qiannan has established 13 public legal service centers and 1,477 legal service workstations, significantly improving access to legal resources for the public [23]. - The legal aid center has been recognized nationally, handling over 2,000 legal aid cases and expanding services to vulnerable populations [24]. - Innovative public legal education initiatives have been launched, including online platforms and community outreach programs, enhancing legal awareness among citizens [25]. Group 6: International Legal Cooperation - The establishment of two arbitration institutions has positioned Qiannan as a key player in regional legal services, facilitating international commercial dispute resolution [26][27]. - The prefecture has engaged in legal exchanges and collaborations with other regions, enhancing its legal governance reputation and sharing best practices [27][28]. - Efforts to integrate legal services with economic development initiatives have been made, supporting local businesses in navigating legal challenges [27].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need to eliminate the practice of "punishment as management" in administrative law enforcement, highlighting that setting mandatory fines and penalties undermines the original purpose of administrative enforcement, which is to maintain public order and protect legal rights [1][2][3] Group 1: Administrative Enforcement Issues - The practice of setting mandatory fines, such as requiring a minimum of 2 administrative penalties and 2000 yuan in fines, leads to a distorted enforcement approach focused on revenue generation rather than compliance and public welfare [1] - Since March of this year, over 50,000 cases related to problematic administrative enforcement against enterprises have been addressed, showing significant progress in standardizing enforcement actions [2] - The article points out that many regions are combining punishment with education, promoting legal awareness among enterprises and the public to prevent and resolve violations effectively [2] Group 2: Recommendations for Improvement - To eradicate "punishment as management," it is essential to adhere strictly to the principles of lawful administration and prevent the impulse to increase revenue through fines [3] - Administrative penalties should consider the public's feelings, ensuring that fines are proportionate and justified, avoiding excessive penalties for minor infractions [3] - Encouraging regular communication between administrative agencies and enterprises is recommended, exploring enforcement models that prioritize prevention, appropriate penalties, and follow-up visits to ensure effective and humane enforcement [3]