Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the systemic issues within the express delivery industry, particularly focusing on the "penalty-based management" model that has led to operational disruptions and financial strain on last-mile delivery networks, especially during peak periods like Double 11 [6][10][21]. Group 1: Current Issues in the Express Delivery Industry - Over 100,000 packages were left undelivered in warehouses in Changsha due to operational halts at several express delivery stations, affecting both consumers and sellers [3][5]. - The immediate cause of the delivery stoppage was a breakdown in the payment chain for delivery fees, leading to a halt in operations for local contractors [6][10]. - The penalty-based management model has resulted in frequent fines for underperformance, which has exacerbated the financial difficulties faced by local delivery networks [6][11][12]. Group 2: Impact on E-commerce - The delivery disruptions have directly impacted e-commerce sellers, leading to increased refund rates, negative reviews, and a loss of consumer trust [7][19]. - The operational challenges faced by last-mile delivery networks during peak sales events like Double 11 have turned what should be a lucrative opportunity into a significant risk for e-commerce businesses [7][19]. Group 3: Structural Problems in the Delivery System - The hierarchical structure of the express delivery system, where risks and responsibilities are unevenly distributed, has led to a situation where local contractors bear the brunt of financial pressures while upper management continues to profit [10][15]. - The ongoing price wars in the industry have driven down delivery fees significantly, from 18 yuan per package in 2005 to as low as 2 yuan in recent years, further squeezing the profit margins of last-mile delivery networks [17][18]. Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - To address the issues, the industry needs to establish a more transparent fee structure and internal assessment mechanisms to prevent the negative consequences of penalty-based management [20][21]. - Encouraging diversification in service offerings at the local level, such as community group buying and advertising, could help stabilize revenue streams for last-mile delivery networks [21].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need to eliminate the practice of "punishment as management" in administrative law enforcement, highlighting that setting mandatory fines and penalties undermines the original purpose of administrative enforcement, which is to maintain public order and protect legal rights [1][2][3] Group 1: Administrative Enforcement Issues - The practice of setting mandatory fines, such as requiring a minimum of 2 administrative penalties and 2000 yuan in fines, leads to a distorted enforcement approach focused on revenue generation rather than compliance and public welfare [1] - Since March of this year, over 50,000 cases related to problematic administrative enforcement against enterprises have been addressed, showing significant progress in standardizing enforcement actions [2] - The article points out that many regions are combining punishment with education, promoting legal awareness among enterprises and the public to prevent and resolve violations effectively [2] Group 2: Recommendations for Improvement - To eradicate "punishment as management," it is essential to adhere strictly to the principles of lawful administration and prevent the impulse to increase revenue through fines [3] - Administrative penalties should consider the public's feelings, ensuring that fines are proportionate and justified, avoiding excessive penalties for minor infractions [3] - Encouraging regular communication between administrative agencies and enterprises is recommended, exploring enforcement models that prioritize prevention, appropriate penalties, and follow-up visits to ensure effective and humane enforcement [3]