Core Viewpoint - The court ruling emphasizes the legal obligation of automotive companies to provide complete driving data, which is not a burden but a guideline for the industry to self-regulate and prioritize consumer rights [1][4]. Group 1: Case Summary - The "Tesla roof rights protection case" resulted in a temporary victory for the female car owner, requiring Tesla to provide complete driving data from 30 minutes before a traffic accident [2]. - The case arose after the owner's father experienced a crash in a Tesla Model 3, leading to claims of "brake failure" and subsequent public protests by the owner [2]. - Tesla argued that the requested data was irrelevant to the accident, and the law did not mandate the provision of complete driving data [2][3]. Group 2: Legal Implications - The court's ruling clarifies the classification of driving data as personal information, similar to other identifiable data such as names and addresses, thus deserving legal protection [3]. - Driving data is deemed essential for consumer awareness, aligning with consumer rights legislation that grants the right to know the true condition of purchased goods [4]. - The ruling serves as a new opportunity for the industry, highlighting the growing importance of driving data in the context of smart connected vehicles [4].