Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of effectively communicating the story of Chinese-style modernization as a strategic task in international communication [1][2][6] - Chinese-style modernization is presented as a significant achievement of the Communist Party, providing a unique narrative that contrasts with Western modernization models [4][5] - The article highlights the historical context of China's modernization journey, detailing the leadership of the Communist Party and the various phases of development that have contributed to the current state of modernization [2][3] Group 2 - The global demand for a modernization path suitable for different national contexts is increasing, with many countries seeking alternatives to Western models that have led to stagnation and conflict [3][4] - China's rapid economic growth, with an average annual growth rate of 8.9% from 1979 to 2023, and its contribution to global economic growth at 24.8% annually, positions it as a leader in providing new opportunities for the world [6][8] - The article discusses the need to break the Western narrative of modernization, asserting that modernization can take various forms and should not be equated solely with Westernization [4][5] Group 3 - The article calls for the establishment of a more effective international communication system to share the story of Chinese-style modernization, emphasizing the need for diverse participation from various sectors [8][9] - It advocates for showcasing China's cultural strengths and the unique characteristics of its modernization process while promoting mutual understanding and cooperation among civilizations [7][9] - The importance of precise communication strategies tailored to different audiences is highlighted, aiming to resonate with global audiences through relatable narratives and experiences [9]

Group 1 - The core fear of Europe is not just Russia, but the historical legacy of the Soviet Union, which is perceived as a much greater threat [1][3] - The statement made by Anton Kobyakov, an advisor to President Putin, claims that the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 was procedurally flawed, suggesting that legally, the Soviet Union still exists [5][7] - Kobyakov's remarks imply that if the Soviet Union's dissolution is deemed invalid, the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict could be redefined as a civil war rather than an act of aggression, providing Russia with a legal basis to counter Western narratives [10] Group 2 - Kobyakov's comments are seen as officially sanctioned by Putin, indicating a strategic communication rather than a personal opinion [8] - The fear of the Soviet Union's resurgence is deeply rooted in European consciousness, with historical references to the Soviet military capabilities that could have overwhelmed Europe in a short time [3][5] - The discussion around the legal status of the Soviet Union reflects broader geopolitical tensions and the ongoing struggle for narrative control between Russia and the West [10]