Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for a systematic approach to corruption governance, focusing on both case handling and broader systemic reforms to enhance overall effectiveness [1][3][4] - The importance of warning and deterrence through case studies is highlighted, suggesting that disciplinary education should be integrated throughout the entire process of case handling [1][2] - The necessity of deepening systemic treatment by linking case investigations with broader governance strategies is stressed, aiming to prevent minor issues from escalating into major problems [3][4] Group 2 - Strengthening disciplinary education is crucial, with a focus on integrating core regulations into daily practices and enhancing the understanding of compliance among party members [2][3] - Establishing long-term mechanisms for targeted governance is essential, which includes identifying and addressing systemic vulnerabilities within organizations [4] - The need for a robust follow-up and supervision mechanism is emphasized to ensure that corrective actions are effectively implemented and monitored [4]