利比里亚《每日观察家报》12月9日报道：利比里亚的生胶非法出口活动正严重威胁该国经济和工 业，其行为不仅违反了博阿凯总统旨在促进国内加工的第151号行政命令，还导致政府税收流失，并可 能造成数千个工作岗位的消失及国内加工工厂的倒闭。报道指出，有数百个集装箱的生胶被伪报为可可 等货物试图走私出口，尽管利比里亚税务局已在蒙罗维亚自由港查扣了部分涉案集装箱，但行业内部人 士警告，若政府不立即采取行动制止这种与更大国际犯罪网络可能存在关联的走私活动，将导致数百万 美元的收入损失和广泛的经济灾难。目前，相关金融和执法机构已介入调查。 （原标题：利比里亚面临非法出口生胶危机，严重威胁国家经济和就业） ...

Core Points - The article discusses the historical context of smuggling activities in Southeast Asia, particularly in the Malacca Strait, highlighting the complex interplay between colonial powers and local economies [1][3][10] - It emphasizes the blurred lines between legal and illegal activities, as well as the ongoing struggle between smugglers and state authorities [1][3][11] Group 1: Historical Context - The Malacca Strait is characterized by its narrowness and shallow depth, making it a challenging area for defining international boundaries due to the cultural similarities of the residents on both sides [1][9] - The colonial division of Southeast Asia by the British and Dutch from 1865 to 1915 led to the establishment of new borders, which inadvertently fostered a large underground economy involving opium traffickers, counterfeiters, and smugglers [1][6][10] - The early civilizations in Southeast Asia lacked clear borders, allowing for a fluidity in trade and smuggling activities, particularly during the era of the Srivijaya kingdom, which thrived on controlling trade in the Malacca Strait [3][4] Group 2: Colonial Impact on Smuggling - The Dutch East India Company implemented strict monopolistic policies in the 17th century, leading to violent suppression of local populations and increased smuggling as residents sought to evade taxes [4][5] - By the 19th century, the political landscape had solidified with British and Dutch colonial expansions, leading to the establishment of trade routes and the exchange of territories, which continued to facilitate smuggling activities [5][6] - The economic interactions between colonizers and local populations were complex, with evidence of a dual economy where local producers engaged in smuggling to connect with colonial markets [11][10] Group 3: Modern Implications - The ongoing smuggling activities in Southeast Asia reflect a historical legacy of colonialism, where the boundaries established by colonial powers continue to influence economic behaviors and relationships [1][3][11] - Recent studies indicate that the economic networks among border residents are intricate, challenging the notion of a clear divide between colonial and local economies [11][10] - The article suggests that understanding the historical context of smuggling in Southeast Asia can provide insights into contemporary economic and political dynamics in the region [1][9][10]