Core Viewpoint - The meeting between US President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky was described as very positive, focusing on the potential for a trilateral meeting involving Russia, Ukraine, and the US to address the ongoing conflict [3][4]. Group 1: Meeting Outcomes - No concrete agreements were reached between the US and Ukraine or between the US and Europe during the meeting, indicating the complexity of the current geopolitical situation [4][5]. - Zelensky emphasized the need for comprehensive security guarantees from the US, including military support and strategic discussions [5][6]. - Trump suggested that negotiations could continue even while hostilities persist, indicating a shift from immediate ceasefire demands to broader peace agreements [5][6]. Group 2: Territorial Issues - The discussion included sensitive topics such as territorial exchanges, with Zelensky presenting key details to Trump [5][7]. - Trump indicated that if Zelensky was willing, the conflict could "almost immediately" end, but this would involve Ukraine not reclaiming Crimea and not joining NATO [8]. Group 3: European Involvement - European leaders accompanied Zelensky to ensure their positions were heard and to prevent any unilateral concessions by Trump [9]. - The presence of multiple European leaders highlights their concern about being sidelined in the resolution of the conflict, emphasizing the importance of their involvement in discussions [9].

俄乌直接会谈 欧盟为何"唱反调"加码制裁？ 金十数据5月17日讯，当地时间16日，俄乌在土耳其进行了直接会谈。同天，欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩 却表示，欧盟方面准备对俄罗斯实施新的大规模制裁。也是在这一天，法国、德国、英国、意大利、波 兰五国国防部长举行会议，提出要加强欧洲防务。全球治理和国际组织研究所所长金玲表示，欧洲认为 美国在乌克兰问题上进行了"越顶外交"，引发了其战略焦虑，欧洲担忧自身沦为安全事务旁观者，因此 持续强化其独立立场，核心策略之一是延续对俄制裁。总体而言，欧盟的系列政策是为争取在乌克兰问 题上的话语权而做出的努力。 ...