一些看似不经意的细节，有时透露出很意味深长的信号。 美国总统特朗普，最近分别给中国和日本领导人打了电话，但对日本来说，这两个电话，却真是五味杂陈。 虽然日本首相高市早苗透露，是特朗普主动打来了电话，而且还告诉她，"他与我是非常亲近的朋友，希望我随时都可以给他打电话"，但这感觉更像是客 套话。 完全我个人的观察，日本现在很沮丧，如果一定要论次数，这两个电话后，至少沮丧了三次。 沮丧一，美国又搞"越顶外交"。 日本自认为是美国铁杆盟友，总是为美国两肋插刀；但特朗普先主动打电话到北京，然后才打给东京。 这不是越顶外交是什么？ 国际关系的残酷在于，自我定位往往只是一厢情愿的幻象。 想当年，日本佐藤政府紧紧追随美国，各种反对中国；但突然看到，尼克松根本就没和日本协商，径直访问了中国。 这随即导致反华的佐藤荣作内阁垮台，新任首相田中角荣立刻推进中日邦交正常化…… 历史一幕在上演？ 别忘了，在跟高市早苗通电话前，特朗普一个电话先打到北京。 一些日本人还自以为是地猜测，这一次，是不是中方先发起的？ 针对日本NHK的询问，中国外交部发言人毛宁25日回答：据我了解，此次通话是美方发起的，通话的氛围是积极的、友好的、建设性的…… ...

Core Viewpoint - The meeting between US President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky was described as very positive, focusing on the potential for a trilateral meeting involving Russia, Ukraine, and the US to address the ongoing conflict [3][4]. Group 1: Meeting Outcomes - No concrete agreements were reached between the US and Ukraine or between the US and Europe during the meeting, indicating the complexity of the current geopolitical situation [4][5]. - Zelensky emphasized the need for comprehensive security guarantees from the US, including military support and strategic discussions [5][6]. - Trump suggested that negotiations could continue even while hostilities persist, indicating a shift from immediate ceasefire demands to broader peace agreements [5][6]. Group 2: Territorial Issues - The discussion included sensitive topics such as territorial exchanges, with Zelensky presenting key details to Trump [5][7]. - Trump indicated that if Zelensky was willing, the conflict could "almost immediately" end, but this would involve Ukraine not reclaiming Crimea and not joining NATO [8]. Group 3: European Involvement - European leaders accompanied Zelensky to ensure their positions were heard and to prevent any unilateral concessions by Trump [9]. - The presence of multiple European leaders highlights their concern about being sidelined in the resolution of the conflict, emphasizing the importance of their involvement in discussions [9].

Core Points - The meeting between US President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky was described as having gone "very well," but no agreements were reached between the US and Ukraine or the US and Europe [1] - The focus of the discussions included a potential trilateral meeting involving the US, Russia, and Ukraine, which could lead to an end to the ongoing conflict [1][2] - Zelensky emphasized the need for comprehensive security guarantees from the US, including military support and strategic discussions [2][3] Group 1 - The meeting aimed to address the territorial issues and the possibility of a peace agreement, with Trump suggesting that negotiations could continue even amidst ongoing conflict [2][4] - Zelensky presented key details on a map during the meeting, indicating Ukraine's desire to resolve all issues, including territorial disputes [2][4] - The European leaders' presence at the meeting was intended to ensure their positions were heard and to prevent any unilateral concessions by Trump [5][6] Group 2 - The discussions included the possibility of incorporating a NATO-like security guarantee into a future peace agreement, which would treat an attack on Ukraine as an attack on all guarantor countries [2][3] - There is skepticism regarding the potential for breakthroughs in negotiations due to the complex legal and political landscape in Ukraine [3][4] - European leaders are concerned about being sidelined in the negotiations and are actively working to maintain their influence in the resolution of the conflict [5][6]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the meetings is the potential for a peace agreement amidst the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, with both Trump and Zelensky expressing optimism about the discussions [1][4] - The meetings focused on two main issues: the trilateral talks involving the US, Russia, and Ukraine, and the contentious territorial disputes [1][5] - Trump indicated that a ceasefire is not a prerequisite for negotiations, suggesting that discussions could continue even while hostilities persist [4][6] Group 2 - Zelensky emphasized the need for comprehensive security guarantees from the US, including military support, training, and intelligence [3][5] - The possibility of a trilateral meeting between the US, Russia, and Ukraine is being considered, with a target date as early as August 22 [7] - European leaders accompanied Zelensky to ensure their positions were heard and to prevent any unilateral concessions by Trump [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent direct talks between Russia and Ukraine in Turkey, while the European Union (EU) plans to impose new large-scale sanctions against Russia, indicating a divergence in strategies between the EU and the US regarding the Ukraine crisis [1] Group 1: EU's Response to the Ukraine Crisis - The EU is preparing to implement new extensive sanctions against Russia, as stated by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen [1] - The defense ministers of France, Germany, the UK, Italy, and Poland convened to discuss strengthening European defense, reflecting a collective effort to enhance security measures in response to the ongoing conflict [1] Group 2: Strategic Concerns of Europe - European leaders express concerns that the US has engaged in "over-the-top diplomacy" regarding Ukraine, leading to strategic anxiety within Europe [1] - There is a fear among European nations of becoming mere bystanders in security matters, prompting them to reinforce their independent stance and continue sanctions against Russia as a core strategy [1] Group 3: EU's Efforts for Influence - The EU's series of policies are aimed at securing a stronger voice in the discussions surrounding the Ukraine issue, highlighting the bloc's desire for greater influence in international affairs [1]