Core Viewpoint - The meeting between US President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky was described as very positive, focusing on the potential for a trilateral meeting involving Russia, Ukraine, and the US to address the ongoing conflict [3][4]. Group 1: Meeting Outcomes - No concrete agreements were reached between the US and Ukraine or between the US and Europe during the meeting, indicating the complexity of the current geopolitical situation [4][5]. - Zelensky emphasized the need for comprehensive security guarantees from the US, including military support and strategic discussions [5][6]. - Trump suggested that negotiations could continue even while hostilities persist, indicating a shift from immediate ceasefire demands to broader peace agreements [5][6]. Group 2: Territorial Issues - The discussion included sensitive topics such as territorial exchanges, with Zelensky presenting key details to Trump [5][7]. - Trump indicated that if Zelensky was willing, the conflict could "almost immediately" end, but this would involve Ukraine not reclaiming Crimea and not joining NATO [8]. Group 3: European Involvement - European leaders accompanied Zelensky to ensure their positions were heard and to prevent any unilateral concessions by Trump [9]. - The presence of multiple European leaders highlights their concern about being sidelined in the resolution of the conflict, emphasizing the importance of their involvement in discussions [9].

美俄乌三边会晤与领土问题是上述会晤的两大重点。据央视新闻，特朗普在会见泽连斯基时表示，如果 一切顺利，美俄乌将举行三方会谈。美方可能会安排三方会谈，如果成功，就有望结束俄乌冲突。他 说，冲突将会结束，但他无法告知何时结束。 "谈得非常好"，这是美国总统特朗普与乌克兰总统泽连斯基对半年后第二次在美国白宫会晤给出的一致 评价。 据央视新闻，当地时间8月18日下午，美国总统特朗普、乌克兰总统泽连斯基与欧洲多国及欧盟、北约 领导人在白宫的正式会晤已结束，但各国领导人仍留在白宫继续磋商，会谈可能会以其他形式进行。 尽管"谈得非常好"，但无论是美国与乌克兰还是美国与欧洲之间，均没有达成任何协议。同济大学德国 问题研究所/欧盟研究所所长、德国研究中心主任郑春荣教授在接受第一财经采访时表示，仅凭一次会 议就要拿出具体的成果比较难，"因为俄乌问题现正处于僵局阶段。在备受争议的领土问题方面，普京 提出要求置换，但乌克兰实际撤出这些地区并不容易，毕竟乌克兰国内宪法也有严格的规定。在复杂的 背景下，此次会议就是各方摸个底、明确红线，未来的谈判依旧路漫漫。" 泽连斯基表示，他在会晤中向特朗普展示了地图上的若干关键细节，并表示希望能在包 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the meetings is the potential for a peace agreement amidst the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, with both Trump and Zelensky expressing optimism about the discussions [1][4] - The meetings focused on two main issues: the trilateral talks involving the US, Russia, and Ukraine, and the contentious territorial disputes [1][5] - Trump indicated that a ceasefire is not a prerequisite for negotiations, suggesting that discussions could continue even while hostilities persist [4][6] Group 2 - Zelensky emphasized the need for comprehensive security guarantees from the US, including military support, training, and intelligence [3][5] - The possibility of a trilateral meeting between the US, Russia, and Ukraine is being considered, with a target date as early as August 22 [7] - European leaders accompanied Zelensky to ensure their positions were heard and to prevent any unilateral concessions by Trump [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent direct talks between Russia and Ukraine in Turkey, while the European Union (EU) plans to impose new large-scale sanctions against Russia, indicating a divergence in strategies between the EU and the US regarding the Ukraine crisis [1] Group 1: EU's Response to the Ukraine Crisis - The EU is preparing to implement new extensive sanctions against Russia, as stated by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen [1] - The defense ministers of France, Germany, the UK, Italy, and Poland convened to discuss strengthening European defense, reflecting a collective effort to enhance security measures in response to the ongoing conflict [1] Group 2: Strategic Concerns of Europe - European leaders express concerns that the US has engaged in "over-the-top diplomacy" regarding Ukraine, leading to strategic anxiety within Europe [1] - There is a fear among European nations of becoming mere bystanders in security matters, prompting them to reinforce their independent stance and continue sanctions against Russia as a core strategy [1] Group 3: EU's Efforts for Influence - The EU's series of policies are aimed at securing a stronger voice in the discussions surrounding the Ukraine issue, highlighting the bloc's desire for greater influence in international affairs [1]