当地时间8月22日，白俄罗斯总统卢卡申科表示，他本人并不热衷于推动在白俄罗斯首都明斯克组织俄 罗斯总统普京和乌克兰总统泽连斯基之间的谈判，尽管明斯克对他们来说是一个理想的地方。但如果俄 乌双方同意并决定前往明斯克，白俄罗斯随时具备高标准筹办会议的能力。他还表示，白俄罗斯将与美 国恢复正常外交关系。 卢卡申科谈到了乌克兰和平计划，表示他在与特朗普的通话中谈到了该计划。卢卡申科指出，实现和平 必须完成几个阶段，但现在最重要的是停止敌对行动和人员伤亡。 卢卡申科表示，他坚信如果就俄乌冲突达成严肃的协议，欧洲将无法干涉，欧洲方面需要以某种方式参 与这一进程，并发挥自己的作用。他补充说，很多事情也取决于美国总统特朗普的决定。如果俄罗斯和 乌克兰在美国的参与下达成协议，欧洲将面临两个选择："他们（指欧洲方面）将被迫要么吞下苦果， 要么乖乖听话。" 卢卡申科表示，白俄罗斯和俄罗斯将坚持确保乌克兰不会成为一个侵略性国家，也不会成为未来袭击白 俄罗斯和俄罗斯的跳板。他指出，欧洲国家也希望与美国一道充当这样的担保人。关于白俄罗斯提供某 些保障的可能性，卢卡申科表示，白方将参与其中，但不会操之过急。（央视新闻） ...

Group 1 - Ukrainian President Zelensky visited the White House again on August 18, meeting with President Trump, marking a significant diplomatic engagement amid ongoing conflict [1][4][6] - The ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict continues, with reports of drone interceptions and missile launches, highlighting the military tensions in the region [3][13] - Zelensky shared a proposal for a peace agreement with European allies, demanding full compensation from Russia for wartime damages, suggesting that the compensation could be sourced from $300 billion of frozen Russian sovereign assets in Western countries [3][15] Group 2 - The atmosphere during the meeting was notably more cordial compared to the previous encounter in February, with Zelensky expressing gratitude multiple times [6][12] - Zelensky's change in attire to a formal suit was noted, as he was previously criticized for not wearing formal clothing during his last visit [5][9] - Discussions included the development of a specific security assurance plan for Ukraine, with ongoing communication among Zelensky's national security team [15][18] Group 3 - NATO Secretary General stated plans to provide Ukraine with security guarantees similar to Article 5 of the NATO treaty, indicating a shift in the level of U.S. involvement in Ukraine's security [18] - The U.S. is moving towards a broader peace agreement, with indications that Russia has made some concessions regarding five Ukrainian regions [18]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that President Trump suggests Ukraine may need to make territorial concessions to reach a potential agreement with Russia, indicating a shift in the negotiation dynamics [1][3] - Trump believes that both Putin and Ukraine are weary of the ongoing conflict, and he anticipates understanding Putin's intentions in the coming weeks [3] - Trump mentioned that 79% of the Donbas region is currently controlled by Russia, implying that Ukraine must recognize the implications of this situation for any negotiations [3] Group 2 - Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov emphasized the need for thorough preparation for a potential meeting between the leaders of Russia and Ukraine, stating that any peace agreement must ensure Russia's security [4] - Ukrainian President Zelensky expressed readiness to meet with Putin without preconditions, indicating a possible shift in Ukraine's negotiation stance [4]

Group 1 - The global market is on edge as discussions between leaders, including Trump and Zelensky, signal a potential increase in momentum towards ending the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which has disrupted global trade and supply chains since 2022 [1][2] - Negotiations among stakeholders from Russia, Ukraine, Europe, and the U.S. have just begun, indicating a long and challenging path ahead for achieving a ceasefire and peace [1][3] - Experts warn that the process of reaching a peace agreement will take a significant amount of time, contrasting with Trump's known preference for quick resolutions [1][4] Group 2 - European leaders, including von der Leyen, Rutte, Merz, Macron, and Starmer, are discussing key conditions for a potential peace agreement, such as land swaps and security guarantees, while Trump has ruled out Ukraine's recovery of Crimea and NATO membership [2] - Pressure appears to be mounting on Zelensky to negotiate, with Trump suggesting that the Ukrainian president could end the conflict almost immediately if he chooses to do so [2] - Ukrainian officials express skepticism about the feasibility of a ceasefire, as previous discussions have shown that Putin is unwilling to consider a ceasefire as a basis for peace talks [3][4]

Core Viewpoint - The meeting between US President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky was described as very positive, focusing on the potential for a trilateral meeting involving Russia, Ukraine, and the US to address the ongoing conflict [3][4]. Group 1: Meeting Outcomes - No concrete agreements were reached between the US and Ukraine or between the US and Europe during the meeting, indicating the complexity of the current geopolitical situation [4][5]. - Zelensky emphasized the need for comprehensive security guarantees from the US, including military support and strategic discussions [5][6]. - Trump suggested that negotiations could continue even while hostilities persist, indicating a shift from immediate ceasefire demands to broader peace agreements [5][6]. Group 2: Territorial Issues - The discussion included sensitive topics such as territorial exchanges, with Zelensky presenting key details to Trump [5][7]. - Trump indicated that if Zelensky was willing, the conflict could "almost immediately" end, but this would involve Ukraine not reclaiming Crimea and not joining NATO [8]. Group 3: European Involvement - European leaders accompanied Zelensky to ensure their positions were heard and to prevent any unilateral concessions by Trump [9]. - The presence of multiple European leaders highlights their concern about being sidelined in the resolution of the conflict, emphasizing the importance of their involvement in discussions [9].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the meetings is the potential for a peace agreement amidst the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, with both Trump and Zelensky expressing optimism about the discussions [1][4] - The meetings focused on two main issues: the trilateral talks involving the US, Russia, and Ukraine, and the contentious territorial disputes [1][5] - Trump indicated that a ceasefire is not a prerequisite for negotiations, suggesting that discussions could continue even while hostilities persist [4][6] Group 2 - Zelensky emphasized the need for comprehensive security guarantees from the US, including military support, training, and intelligence [3][5] - The possibility of a trilateral meeting between the US, Russia, and Ukraine is being considered, with a target date as early as August 22 [7] - European leaders accompanied Zelensky to ensure their positions were heard and to prevent any unilateral concessions by Trump [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant progress made during the meeting between Trump and Putin on August 15, where Russia implicitly recognized the security guarantees provided by the US and Europe to Ukraine, similar to NATO's Article 5 [1][4]. Group 1: Meeting Outcomes - The meeting in Anchorage resulted in Russia's implicit acknowledgment of US and European security guarantees for Ukraine, allowing for a Western coalition to defend Ukraine if attacked by Russia [4]. - The details of the meeting suggest that there may be more undisclosed information, particularly regarding the discussions between Trump and Putin during their private time together [4][3]. Group 2: Peace and Ceasefire Agreements - Ukraine and the EU are seeking a ceasefire agreement, while Russia prefers a comprehensive peace agreement that addresses most issues at once [5][6]. - Trump appears to favor reaching a peace agreement, which aligns with Russia's desire for a resolution [6]. Group 3: Russian Objectives - Russia aims to achieve four key outcomes through compromises: legitimizing occupied territories, lifting sanctions from the US and Europe, restructuring the European security framework, and normalizing US-Russia relations [7][8]. - To facilitate these goals, Russia has accepted the security guarantees for Ukraine from the US and Europe [8]. Group 4: Territorial Issues - The article highlights the contentious issue of territorial exchanges, particularly regarding the Donbas region, where Russia has a strong interest in controlling certain areas [10]. - There are indications that Russia may seek to exchange territories it occupies for the remaining parts of Donetsk, which could be seen as humiliating for Ukraine [11][10]. Group 5: Sanctions and Future Negotiations - If a peace agreement is reached, it is likely to include a limited lifting of sanctions rather than a complete removal [14]. - The article predicts that Russia may not achieve its territorial ambitions through either military or diplomatic means and will likely have to accept the current situation [14].

Group 1 - European leaders are gathering in Washington to support Ukrainian President Zelensky, showcasing unity on the Ukraine issue and preventing further marginalization of Europe [1][2] - The meeting is expected to discuss territorial claims by Russia and the framework for security guarantees for Ukraine, with a potential trilateral meeting involving the US, Russia, and Ukraine [3][4] - There is a significant divide between Ukraine and the US regarding territorial issues, particularly concerning Crimea, with Zelensky asserting that Ukraine should not have given up Crimea [3][6] Group 2 - The prospect of a peace agreement to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict is complicated, with both sides needing to agree on a ceasefire before discussing long-term solutions [6] - European leaders, including von der Leyen, emphasize continued support for Ukraine until a just and lasting peace is achieved, while also applying pressure on Russia [6] - US Secretary of State Rubio acknowledges that there is still a long way to go before a peace agreement can be reached, highlighting the need for concessions from both sides [6]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article revolves around the significance of Ukrainian President Zelensky's visit to the White House, supported by multiple European leaders, highlighting European unity and support for Ukraine amidst ongoing tensions with Russia [1][2]. - European leaders' collective visit aims to prevent further marginalization of Europe in the Ukraine issue and to provide backing for Zelensky, emphasizing the importance of European involvement in resolving the Russia-Ukraine conflict [2][3]. - The discussions during the meetings are expected to cover key issues such as Russia's territorial claims and the framework for security guarantees for Ukraine, with a focus on how the U.S. will participate in these efforts [3][6]. Group 2 - The article outlines the contrasting perspectives on achieving peace, with Trump advocating for a direct peace agreement to end the conflict, while Ukraine and European leaders believe a ceasefire must precede any long-term solutions [6]. - There is an acknowledgment of the long road ahead for a peace agreement, with significant divisions remaining between Russia and Ukraine, necessitating concessions from both sides for a resolution [6].

（原标题：伟伟道来｜ 泽连斯基二进白宫，上次献稀土，这次谈领土） 2025年2月28日和8月18日，乌克兰总统泽连斯基两次前往白宫会见美国总统特朗普。 这个信息是美国方面发布的，还没有得到俄罗斯方面的确认。关于这个信息，有两个关键点。第一，虽 然特朗普一向信口开河，但如此重大的信息，不可能是假的；第二，如果这个信息是真的，这个信息是 在什么场景下发布的？ 这一点非常重要。8月15日美俄首脑会晤有一个细节，普京到达之后，特朗普和普京同乘一辆车前往会 场，两个人是单独相处的。这个信息，或者是普京在车里口头告诉特朗普的，或者是在正式会晤中当众 说出的。如果普京是在车里告诉特朗普这个信息，那么，普京告诉特朗普的，恐怕不止这一条信息。 现在，泽连斯基和欧洲领导人蜂拥而至，他们希望得到第一手的关键信息，希望知道在车里的时候，普 京和特朗普到底谈了什么。 结合其他信息，笔者归纳以下几点： 第一，关于停火协议和和平协议。 2月28日那次，泽连斯基是带着矿产（稀土）协议去的，结果，协议不仅没有签成，泽连斯基还被特朗 普当众羞辱。 8月18日这次，泽连斯基不是一个人了，欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩、法国总统马克龙、德国总理默茨、 英国 ...