2月24日，中国商务部发布公告，将三菱造船株式会社等20家参与提升日本军事实力的实体列入出口管 制管控名单，将斯巴鲁株式会社等20家无法核实两用物项最终用户、最终用途的日本实体列入关注名 单。此举可被视为中国在既有制度框架下，将维护国家安全和利益、履行防扩散等国际义务、开展安全 风险治理、维护地区和平稳定等目标相结合的一次创新性探索，也标志着中国作为负责任大国，在维护 战后国际秩序，以及维持地区和平与稳定的实践中，再度迈上了一个新台阶。 此次对日两用物项出口管制的强化措施具有三个显著特征： 其一，稳定性。中国对日出口管制的稳定性体现在目标的延续性，以及政策工具的可预期性上。此次中 国出口管制的对象，始终聚焦于作出错误言行并拒绝改正的高市政府，聚焦于日本特定实体。中方坚持 从维护国家核心利益，履行中国防扩散义务，维护国际和平、统筹安全与发展的目标出发，发挥出口管 制作用，对两用物项的对日出口进行稳定监管。 其二，精准性。管制聚焦于"两用物项"这一先天具有军民两用属性、可能提升军事潜力并与大规模杀伤 性武器防扩散密切相关的类别。这一制度安排意味着，中国具备对高风险主体实施更小颗粒度监管的法 理与程序工具，从而使管 ...

（来源：天津日报） 转自：天津日报 傅聪说，《联合国宪章》确立了禁止使用武力或武力威胁的国际法基本原则，该原则对捍卫战后国际秩 序、避免第三次世界大战具有重要作用。值得警惕的是，近来日本领导人逆历史潮流而动，公然将中国 台湾与日本"存亡危机事态"相关联，并臆想依据日美同盟关系作出应对，妄图借所谓"集体自卫权"武力 介入台湾问题。 傅聪指出，有关谬论在法律上站不住脚，台湾是中国不可分割的领土，如何解决台湾问题是中国的内 政，他国无权干涉，更无权使用武力进行所谓的"自卫"。有关谬论背弃日本作为战败国必须履行的国际 义务，违反《开罗宣言》《波茨坦公告》《日本投降书》规定的战败国义务。有关谬论违反《联合国宪 章》规定的尊重各国主权和领土完整、不干涉内政的基本原则，是对战后国际秩序的严重挑衅。有关谬 论应当引起所有爱好和平国家的警惕和反对，日本无论以任何借口行使"集体自卫权"介入台湾问题，都 将构成对中国的侵略，中方必将迎头痛击。 新华社联合国2月18日电 中国常驻联合国代表傅聪18日在《联合国宪章》和加强联合国作用特别委员会 2026年届会一般性辩论上发言时强调，日本无论以任何借口行使"集体自卫权"介入台湾问题，都将 ...

傅聪指出，有关谬论在法律上站不住脚，台湾是中国不可分割的领土，如何解决台湾问题是中国的内 政，他国无权干涉，更无权使用武力进行所谓的"自卫"。有关谬论背弃日本作为战败国必须履行的国际 义务，违反《开罗宣言》《波茨坦公告》《日本投降书》规定的战败国义务。有关谬论违反《联合国宪 章》规定的尊重各国主权和领土完整、不干涉内政的基本原则，是对战后国际秩序的严重挑衅。有关谬 论应当引起所有爱好和平国家的警惕和反对，日本无论以任何借口行使"集体自卫权"介入台湾问题，都 将构成对中国的侵略，中方必将迎头痛击。 傅聪说，《联合国宪章》确立了禁止使用武力或武力威胁的国际法基本原则，该原则对捍卫战后国际秩 序、避免第三次世界大战具有重要作用。值得警惕的是，近来日本领导人逆历史潮流而动，公然将中国 台湾与日本"存亡危机事态"相关联，并臆想依据日美同盟关系作出应对，妄图借所谓"集体自卫权"武力 介入台湾问题。 新华社联合国2月18日电 中国常驻联合国代表傅聪18日在《联合国宪章》和加强联合国作用特别委员 会2026年届会一般性辩论上发言时强调，日本无论以任何借口行使"集体自卫权"介入台湾问题，都将构 成对中国的侵略，中方必将迎头痛击 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government expresses concerns regarding Japan's political shift towards the right following recent election results, emphasizing the historical lessons from Japan's militaristic past and its implications for regional peace and stability [1] Group 1: Historical Context - The spokesperson highlights Japan's militaristic actions in the past, which led to aggressive wars and significant suffering for both neighboring countries and the Japanese people [1] - The statement underscores the importance of learning from history to avoid repeating past mistakes [1] Group 2: Future Implications - The Chinese government questions whether Japan will continue on a path of peaceful development and build trust with neighboring countries and the international community through its actions [1] - There is a call for Japanese politicians and intellectuals to reflect on whether Japan will challenge the post-war international order or adhere to it [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of consolidating the international community's commitment to the One China principle, which is seen as a respect for China's sovereignty and a necessary action to maintain the outcomes of World War II and the post-war international order [1] - The article asserts that Taiwan has historically been an inseparable part of China, and the One China principle has been reaffirmed by the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 in 1971, recognizing the People's Republic of China as the sole legitimate government representing all of China [1] - The Chinese government has been striving for peaceful development of cross-strait relations, while recent actions by Taiwan authorities promoting independence and external forces attempting to use Taiwan to hinder China's development are viewed as challenges to national sovereignty [1] Group 2 - The article highlights that Taiwan's liberation from Japanese colonial rule is a significant achievement of the Chinese people's victory in the Anti-Japanese War, and it calls for the international community to recognize this historical fact and oppose any resurgence of militarism [2] - In 2025, China will legally establish October 25 as Taiwan Liberation Day, which is seen as a meaningful decision reflecting the importance of history and the pursuit of peace, while also demonstrating the government's unwavering determination to safeguard national sovereignty and development interests [2] - The commemoration of Taiwan's liberation is framed as a victory for all Chinese people and a part of the global anti-fascist struggle, deserving of remembrance and transmission [2] Group 3 - The One China principle is described as a universal consensus within the international community, aligning with the common interests of all peace-loving nations and peoples, and contributing to the maintenance of international fairness, justice, and regional peace and stability [3]

自去年11月发表涉台错误言论以来，日本首相高市早苗非但不知悔改，反而频耍花招。 近日，高市早苗在接受日媒采访时，首次将台海紧急事态与日美同盟捆绑，宣称"若台湾出现危机，日 美将采取联合行动撤离公民"。此举不仅再次引起中国强烈不满与严正抗议，就连日本国内舆论都是一 片哗然，多位日本前政要纷纷出面，痛批高市的错误言论正将中日关系推向"危险境地"。从"存亡危机 事态"的无端挑衅，到"旧金山和约"的无理诡辩，再到拉美国当"挡箭牌"的无耻投机，三个月以来，高 市早苗上演了一出"挑衅—试探—再挑衅"的循环闹剧。 谬论翻新，执迷不悟。 1月26日，高市早苗在接受朝日电视台采访时，公然宣称"若台湾发生危机，美日将联合撤离公民"，并 扬言"美军若遭受攻击，日本不会袖手旁观"。 总的来看，高市的这番涉台言论有三个突出特点。 仍要介入台海。面对中国强有力的反制，高市早苗此前一直在玩"模糊战术"，辩称日本在台湾问题上的 基本立场"没有任何改变"，但却拒绝明确表达这一立场到底是什么。而这次采访中，她又抛出了所谓 的"撤侨论"。看来看去，高市介入台海的真实意图并未改变。 编造干涉理由。相较于此前将台海局势与所谓"存亡危机事态"直接挂钩的 ...

郭嘉昆表示，根据《开罗宣言》《波茨坦公告》和《日本投降书》等一系列具有充分国际法效力的文 件，日本窃取于中国之台湾必须归还中国；日本应完全解除武装，不得维持能使其重新武装的产业。日 本宪法对军力、交战权、战争权也作出严格限制。 "以上这些都是日本必须严格履行的政治承诺和不容推卸的法律义务。日方声称要在法律范围内行动， 却一再粗暴干涉中国内政，甚至对中国发出武力威胁，这完全是自相矛盾。"郭嘉昆说。 他说："日本曾对台湾殖民统治长达半个世纪，犯下罄竹难书的罪行，对中国人民负有严重历史罪责。 无论在历史上、法律上，日方都没有任何资格对中国台湾置喙。" 郭嘉昆表示，日方有关言论再次暴露日本右翼势力挑动对立、制造事端，借机推进"再军事化"、挑战战 后国际秩序的野心。这已经对地区和平稳定和中日关系政治基础构成严重威胁，国际社会必须高度警 惕、坚决抵制。 "我们再次敦促日方恪守中日四个政治文件精神和所作政治承诺，切实反思纠错，停止在台湾问题上的 操弄和妄动。"他说。 转自：衢州日报 新华社北京1月27日电 （记者 邵艺博 朱超） 针对日本首相高市早苗的涉台言论，外交部发言人郭嘉昆 27日说，无论在历史上、法律上，日方都没有 ...

转自：扬子晚报 有报道说，日本首相高市早苗称，如果台海发生危机，美日可能采取联合行动撤离美日公民，在这样的 情况下，日本不可能抛弃它的盟友。对此，外交部发言人郭嘉昆1月27日在例行记者会上说，无论在历 史上、法律上，日方都没有任何资格对中国台湾置喙。 郭嘉昆说，日方有关言论再次暴露日本右翼势力挑动对立、制造事端，借机推进"再军事化"，挑战战后 国际秩序的野心，这已经对地区和平稳定和中日关系政治基础构成严重威胁，国际社会必须高度警惕、 坚决抵制。 郭嘉昆表示，日本曾对台湾殖民统治长达半个世纪，犯下罄竹难书的罪行，对中国人民负有严重历史罪 责。"我们再次敦促日方恪守中日四个政治文件精神和所作政治承诺，切实反思纠错，停止在台湾问题 上的操弄和妄动。" 来源 | 新华社 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights Japan's Prime Minister's statement regarding potential joint actions with the U.S. in the event of a crisis in the Taiwan Strait, emphasizing Japan's commitment to its allies [1] - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson criticized Japan for its contradictory stance of claiming to act within legal boundaries while interfering in China's internal affairs and issuing threats, which undermines regional stability [3] - The historical context is provided, noting Japan's colonial rule over Taiwan for half a century and the associated historical responsibilities towards the Chinese people, asserting that Japan has no right to comment on Taiwan [3] Group 2 - The article points out that Japan's recent rhetoric reflects the ambitions of right-wing forces to provoke tensions and advance militarization, posing a serious threat to the post-war international order [3] - There is a call for the international community to remain vigilant and resist Japan's actions, which are seen as detrimental to peace and stability in the region [3] - The Chinese side urges Japan to adhere to the spirit of the four political documents between China and Japan and to cease its manipulations regarding the Taiwan issue [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the response from the Chinese Foreign Ministry regarding Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's comments on Taiwan, emphasizing that Japan has no right to interfere in Taiwan's affairs and highlighting historical grievances between China and Japan [1]. Group 1 - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Guo Jia Kun, stated that Japan's comments reveal the ambitions of Japanese right-wing forces to provoke conflict and advance militarization, posing a serious threat to regional peace and stability as well as to Sino-Japanese relations [1]. - Guo emphasized that Japan's historical colonial rule over Taiwan for half a century has resulted in severe historical grievances towards the Chinese people, and urged Japan to adhere to the spirit of the four political documents between China and Japan [1]. - The article calls for the international community to remain vigilant and firmly resist Japan's actions regarding the Taiwan issue, indicating a need for Japan to reflect and correct its stance [1].