Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the escalating tensions between Thailand and Cambodia due to border disputes, leading to military confrontations and diplomatic downgrades [1][2]. - On the morning of the 24th, a conflict erupted after Cambodian forces fired first, resulting in one Thai soldier being injured [1]. - Thailand's military responded by deploying F-16 fighter jets to destroy two Cambodian military facilities, indicating a significant escalation in military engagement [1]. Group 2 - The diplomatic relations between Thailand and Cambodia have deteriorated, with both countries recalling their ambassadors and expelling each other's diplomats [2]. - The tensions were exacerbated by a previous incident where a Thai soldier was injured by a landmine, which Thailand attributed to Cambodian actions, a claim that Cambodia denied [2]. - The Thai government has advised its citizens to leave Cambodia promptly, reflecting concerns over safety amid the rising conflict [1].

Core Viewpoint - Cambodia has submitted four disputed areas, including three ancient temples and the "Emerald Triangle," to the International Court for arbitration, amid escalating tensions with Thailand over border disputes [1][2]. Group 1: Cambodia's Position - Cambodia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs criticized Thailand for increasing military deployments, unilaterally closing border crossings, and digging trenches in sensitive areas, which has exacerbated border tensions [2]. - The Cambodian government asserts that the disputed areas fall within its sovereignty, as defined by historical treaties and agreements, including the 1904 Franco-Siamese Convention and the 1907 Franco-Siamese Boundary Treaty [2]. - Cambodia emphasizes that its decision to approach the International Court is a legal and peaceful measure, not a provocation, and remains open to resolving other border issues through existing bilateral mechanisms [2][3]. Group 2: Thailand's Response - Thailand's Ministry of Foreign Affairs reiterated its commitment to resolving the border dispute through the Joint Boundary Committee and rejected Cambodia's claims regarding the disruption of negotiations [3]. - The Thai government maintains that the 2000 memorandum of understanding stipulates that border issues should be resolved bilaterally and does not mention the involvement of the International Court or any third-party dispute resolution mechanisms [3]. - Thailand has expressed concerns over Cambodia's military actions and has stated that it acted in self-defense during recent border incidents [4]. Group 3: Impact on Bilateral Relations - The border dispute has led to the closure of border crossings, affecting a significant number of tourists and cross-border workers, indicating that neither side benefits from the ongoing tensions [4]. - Cambodia's National Assembly President has voiced support for the government's decision to take the border dispute to the International Court, framing Cambodia as a victim of Thailand's internal political struggles [3].