报道还提到，泰国外交部长9日在接受路透社采访时表示，柬埔寨必须展现诚意并率先采取行动缓和局 势，同时排除了第三方调解的可能性。 "假设从现在开始一小时后，双方同意坐到谈判桌前开始沟通，"柬埔寨人民党中央外委会第一副主席索 斯亚拉在金边接受路透社视频采访时表示，"这会是一个非常好的主意。"但索斯亚拉同时表示，柬埔寨 不会主动发起谈判进程，"我们必须建立起双方共同认可的良好意愿。" 【环球网报道 记者 张倩】据路透社报道，柬埔寨高官当地时间9日表示，柬埔寨愿与泰国举行双边谈 判，以停止两国边境冲突，但双方须先建立起共同意愿。泰柬两国此前互相指责对方违反停火协议，引 发新一轮边境冲突。 泰国和柬埔寨边境地区7日爆发激烈冲突，多地响起密集炮火。双方均指责对方"先开火"。泰国军方10 日表示，泰柬双方冲突仍在边境多个省份持续。美国总统特朗普于美东时间9日在宾夕法尼亚州一场集 会上发表讲话称，他将于当地时间10日就泰柬新一轮边境冲突进行通话斡旋。 ...

Trade Policy Changes - The US has removed 40% tariffs on some Brazilian goods like coffee, meat, and fruits [1] - Approximately 22% of Brazilian exports to the US are still subject to tariffs [1] - The tariff removal impacts Brazilian products imported into the US on or after November 13, with refunds for previously collected tariffs following standard procedures [1] Bilateral Negotiations - The easing of tariffs is considered a "major advancement" in ongoing US-Brazil negotiations [1] - Brazil remains optimistic about continued negotiations with the US [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of the Trump administration's "security for economy" strategy, using South Korea as a case study, highlighting how economic concessions were made under the pressure of security threats from the U.S. [1][18] Economic Concessions - South Korea agreed to a 15% tariff on exports to the U.S., which, although lower than the initially threatened 25%, still undermines the competitiveness of South Korean companies in the U.S. market [3] - South Korea was compelled to invest $350 billion in the U.S., with $150 billion specifically allocated for the U.S. shipbuilding industry, adversely affecting South Korea's own leading shipbuilding sector [3] - An additional $100 billion in U.S. liquefied natural gas purchases was mandated, leading to significant capital outflow and compromising South Korea's energy security strategy [3] Security Pressure - The U.S. military's potential withdrawal of 4,500 troops from South Korea created significant political turmoil, leading to heightened fears beyond mere economic threats [5] - The U.S. justified the troop withdrawal as a strategic adjustment to reduce vulnerability in front-line deployments, which was perceived as a form of extreme pressure on South Korea [8] Global Trade Dynamics - South Korea's concessions are part of a broader trend where allies have succumbed to U.S. pressure under the "America First" policy, with other countries like the UK, Japan, and the EU also making significant economic sacrifices [10][12] - Countries like Canada, India, and China have adopted different strategies in response to U.S. pressure, with Canada taking a hard stance, India employing delay tactics, and China successfully forcing concessions from the U.S. [14] Long-term Implications - The compromises made by South Korea reflect a successful implementation of the Trump administration's strategy, which, while yielding short-term economic benefits for the U.S., risks eroding long-standing alliances and trust among allies [18]

Group 1 - The Thai Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson emphasized that bilateral mechanisms are the best way to resolve the current conflict, indicating a preference for direct negotiations without third-party mediation [1] - Thailand is open to dialogue but insists that Cambodia must cease violent actions at the border before discussions can commence, highlighting a commitment to peaceful conflict resolution [1]

Core Viewpoint - Cambodia has submitted four disputed areas, including three ancient temples and the "Emerald Triangle," to the International Court for arbitration, amid escalating tensions with Thailand over border disputes [1][2]. Group 1: Cambodia's Position - Cambodia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs criticized Thailand for increasing military deployments, unilaterally closing border crossings, and digging trenches in sensitive areas, which has exacerbated border tensions [2]. - The Cambodian government asserts that the disputed areas fall within its sovereignty, as defined by historical treaties and agreements, including the 1904 Franco-Siamese Convention and the 1907 Franco-Siamese Boundary Treaty [2]. - Cambodia emphasizes that its decision to approach the International Court is a legal and peaceful measure, not a provocation, and remains open to resolving other border issues through existing bilateral mechanisms [2][3]. Group 2: Thailand's Response - Thailand's Ministry of Foreign Affairs reiterated its commitment to resolving the border dispute through the Joint Boundary Committee and rejected Cambodia's claims regarding the disruption of negotiations [3]. - The Thai government maintains that the 2000 memorandum of understanding stipulates that border issues should be resolved bilaterally and does not mention the involvement of the International Court or any third-party dispute resolution mechanisms [3]. - Thailand has expressed concerns over Cambodia's military actions and has stated that it acted in self-defense during recent border incidents [4]. Group 3: Impact on Bilateral Relations - The border dispute has led to the closure of border crossings, affecting a significant number of tourists and cross-border workers, indicating that neither side benefits from the ongoing tensions [4]. - Cambodia's National Assembly President has voiced support for the government's decision to take the border dispute to the International Court, framing Cambodia as a victim of Thailand's internal political struggles [3].

Core Point - The UAE Trade Minister stated that the bilateral negotiations between the UAE and the EU do not hinder the potential EU-GCC trade agreement [1] Group 1 - The UAE is actively engaging in bilateral negotiations with the EU [1] - The potential EU-GCC trade agreement remains a priority despite ongoing bilateral talks [1]