Group 1 - The article discusses the complexities of the Ukraine situation and the contrasting approaches of Trump and Zelensky regarding U.S. support and NATO membership [4][6][10] - Trump’s primary goal is to achieve a ceasefire in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, while Zelensky seeks U.S. security guarantees and NATO membership [7][8][12] - The article highlights the historical context of Ukraine's security concerns, including past failures of international guarantees after the Soviet Union's collapse and during the Crimea crisis [9][10] Group 2 - The article critiques the diplomatic incident involving Trump and Zelensky, emphasizing the lack of trust and fundamental disagreements between them [5][14] - It suggests that if Ukraine signs a mining agreement with the U.S., it may lead to a ceasefire but could result in long-term negative consequences for Ukraine, such as unresolved territorial disputes and lack of security guarantees [14][30] - The author argues that Trump's pragmatic approach prioritizes U.S. interests and financial considerations over moral obligations, which could reshape international relations [11][31] Group 3 - The article explores the rise of Trumpism as a reaction to the perceived failures of the post-2008 global order, highlighting the divide between elite interests and those of the general populace [17][21] - It discusses the implications of Trump's policies on U.S. global standing and the potential erosion of moral authority in international relations [31][32] - The author warns that the current geopolitical landscape is marked by complexity and ambiguity, making it difficult to achieve clear resolutions to conflicts like the Ukraine situation [28][29]