Core Viewpoint - Nintendo Switch 2 has implemented restrictions on video output to third-party docks, limiting compatibility and forcing consumers to rely on official accessories [3][4][9]. Group 1: Technical Limitations - Nintendo has intentionally set limitations on the USB-C interface of Switch 2, using software encryption and a dedicated encryption chip, which prevents the console from working with most third-party docks [3][4]. - Testing revealed that Switch 2 communicates with the official dock using standard signals initially, but switches to encrypted signals for video output, which third-party docks cannot replicate [3][4][7]. - The only exception found is the Antank S3 Max dock, which successfully uses Nintendo's encryption algorithm to communicate with Switch 2 [6][7]. Group 2: Market Implications - This strategy mirrors past practices from Nintendo, where third-party solutions were often rendered ineffective, pushing consumers towards official products [9]. - The current trend in portable display technology has evolved significantly, with various wired and wireless solutions becoming mainstream, highlighting a disconnect between consumer expectations and Nintendo's approach [15][17]. - The necessity of using the official dock for video output contradicts the portable nature of the Switch 2, as it complicates user experience compared to other devices that can easily connect via USB-C [13][17].