Group 1 - The core point of the article discusses the recent peace agreement between Azerbaijan and Armenia, facilitated by the United States, which includes the establishment of a transportation corridor controlled by the U.S. for 99 years [3][4][42] - The historical context of the conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia is rooted in a century-long rivalry, exacerbated by the geopolitical dynamics of the region, particularly the influence of Russia [5][10][20] - The agreement is seen as a strategic move for both countries, especially Armenia, to seek alternatives to Russian influence, as both nations have grown disillusioned with Russia's role in the region [22][41] Group 2 - The Zangezur corridor is positioned as a significant geopolitical asset, connecting Azerbaijan to Turkey and enhancing its strategic importance in the region [24][38] - The corridor is expected to improve trade routes and energy supplies, particularly for Azerbaijan's oil and gas exports to Turkey and the EU, which is crucial for both economic and energy security [39][40] - The article highlights the potential for increased geopolitical tensions, particularly with Iran's strong opposition to the U.S. presence in the region and concerns over the implications for regional stability [44][51] Group 3 - The peace agreement and the establishment of the corridor could lead to a shift in the regional power dynamics, with the U.S. gaining a foothold in an area traditionally dominated by Russia [16][42] - The involvement of the U.S. raises concerns among neighboring countries, particularly Iran and Turkey, about the potential for increased military presence and influence in the South Caucasus [45][52] - The article concludes that while the peace agreement is a positive development, the broader implications for regional integration and trust among global powers remain uncertain [53][54]