Core Viewpoint - The 20th Central Commission for Discipline Inspection emphasizes the need to continuously optimize the structure and capacity of grassroots disciplinary inspection and supervision institutions, highlighting the importance of grassroots supervision in the party and national supervision system, which directly affects the interests of the people [1] Group 1: Precision Focus - Grassroots supervision must shift from a "one-size-fits-all" approach to a targeted one, implementing a list management system to clarify supervision boundaries and ensure effective coverage [2] - The introduction of a micro-power list system for village-level affairs aims to standardize operations and identify 58 integrity risk points across 39 process maps [2] - The use of technology, such as the "Supervision One-Point Access" platform, enhances the transparency and effectiveness of supervision by enabling real-time data comparison and alerts [2] Group 2: Collaborative Approach - A "room-group-field" linkage supervision mechanism is established to integrate various supervisory resources, facilitating information sharing and mutual assistance [3] - Collaboration with audit and inspection bodies is strengthened to ensure timely follow-up on issues identified in audits, addressing potential corruption and misconduct [3] - The establishment of a grassroots public supervision network encourages community involvement in monitoring and reporting, enhancing the overall effectiveness of supervision [3] Group 3: Long-term Effectiveness - The focus on long-term institutional mechanisms aims to solidify and deepen the results of supervision, addressing systemic issues revealed by cases of micro-corruption [4] - The development of a regular supervision system is emphasized, with effective methods being codified into institutional norms to ensure sustainability [4] - Strengthening the capabilities of grassroots supervisory bodies is crucial, ensuring they are well-equipped and trained to perform their duties effectively [5]