Core Viewpoint - The 20th Central Commission for Discipline Inspection emphasizes the need to continuously optimize the structure and capacity of grassroots disciplinary inspection and supervision institutions, highlighting the importance of grassroots supervision in the party and national supervision system, which directly affects the interests of the people [1] Group 1: Precision Focus - Grassroots supervision must shift from a "one-size-fits-all" approach to a targeted one, implementing a list management system to clarify supervision boundaries and ensure effective coverage [2] - The introduction of a micro-power list system for village-level affairs aims to standardize operations and identify 58 integrity risk points across 39 process maps [2] - The use of technology, such as the "Supervision One-Point Access" platform, enhances the transparency and effectiveness of supervision by enabling real-time data comparison and alerts [2] Group 2: Collaborative Approach - A "room-group-field" linkage supervision mechanism is established to integrate various supervisory resources, facilitating information sharing and mutual assistance [3] - Collaboration with audit and inspection bodies is strengthened to ensure timely follow-up on issues identified in audits, addressing potential corruption and misconduct [3] - The establishment of a grassroots public supervision network encourages community involvement in monitoring and reporting, enhancing the overall effectiveness of supervision [3] Group 3: Long-term Effectiveness - The focus on long-term institutional mechanisms aims to solidify and deepen the results of supervision, addressing systemic issues revealed by cases of micro-corruption [4] - The development of a regular supervision system is emphasized, with effective methods being codified into institutional norms to ensure sustainability [4] - Strengthening the capabilities of grassroots supervisory bodies is crucial, ensuring they are well-equipped and trained to perform their duties effectively [5]

Group 1 - The article highlights a case of corruption involving a village party secretary in Jiangxi Province, who inflated expenses and misappropriated collective funds for personal use, leading to his expulsion from the party [1] - The investigation revealed that the individual misappropriated 9 million yuan and misused over 30 million yuan of village collective funds [1] - The local disciplinary committee implemented a collaborative mechanism to enhance investigation efficiency, involving multiple levels of oversight to address the complex relationships and resistance encountered during the inquiry [1] Group 2 - The Yichun City Discipline Inspection Commission is focused on strengthening grassroots supervision to ensure proper functioning of local power, addressing issues such as weak oversight and interference from personal relationships [2] - A collaborative mechanism has been established in Yichun City, integrating various supervisory bodies to enhance communication and resource sharing, resulting in the investigation of 447 cases involving 455 individuals this year [2] - The emphasis on building a high-quality, professional disciplinary inspection team is crucial for improving the effectiveness of grassroots supervision [2] Group 3 - The Yichun City Discipline Inspection Commission organizes training sessions for local disciplinary committee members and conducts regular lectures on key investigative skills and procedures [3] - A comprehensive manual for local disciplinary committees has been developed to standardize case handling processes, providing guidance on various aspects of investigation [3] Group 4 - The implementation of the "Supervision Point" platform has enabled the identification of fraudulent activities at the village level, leading to disciplinary actions against involved parties [4] - The Yichun City disciplinary bodies are enhancing the role of grassroots supervisory teams, such as village disciplinary committee members, to improve oversight effectiveness [4] - Specific measures have been taken to ensure regular engagement by village disciplinary committee members in monitoring activities, resulting in the identification of numerous issues and subsequent rectifications [4]