Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the psychological concept of "the elephant behind the mosquito," emphasizing that minor irritations often stem from deeper emotional issues rooted in past experiences [6][21]. Group 1 - The "elephant" represents hidden emotional burdens that influence reactions to seemingly trivial matters, leading to unexpected emotional outbursts [6][12]. - The concept of "cognitive framework" is introduced, which is shaped by personal experiences and influences behavior and emotional responses throughout life [7][21]. - The article illustrates a case study of a couple, Anna and Peter, whose conflicts over minor issues reveal deeper emotional needs and past experiences that affect their relationship dynamics [10][24]. Group 2 - The article references Maslow's hierarchy of needs, explaining that unmet fundamental needs can lead to persistent emotional issues, making minor irritations feel overwhelming [13][15]. - It suggests that understanding one's emotional needs and how they are met can help in managing emotional responses and improving overall well-being [27][35]. - The article provides strategies for recognizing and addressing emotional triggers, emphasizing the importance of self-awareness and communication in relationships [36][42].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of a founder or CEO's stable core, which can be understood through the "Onion Model" that distinguishes between background and experience, core capabilities, and underlying driving forces [2][3][6]. Group 1: Onion Model - The Onion Model consists of three layers: the outer layer represents background and experience, the middle layer signifies core capabilities, and the innermost layer reflects underlying driving forces [6]. - Background and experience are static and refer to past achievements, while core capabilities and driving forces are dynamic and crucial for future success [6]. - Systemic thinking and self-reflection are essential components of core capabilities, enabling leaders to identify and address primary contradictions and understand the temporal context of decisions [6][7]. Group 2: Systemic Thinking - Effective systemic thinking involves recognizing the main contradictions within a system and understanding the time dimension of decisions, which can significantly impact outcomes [7][10]. - Leaders must be able to evaluate their strategic decisions based on a broad understanding of the industry and its changes, as well as the timing of those decisions [7][10]. - Companies like Coca-Cola and Tesla exemplify strong systemic thinking through their clear and concise strategic frameworks that adapt to both spatial and temporal dimensions [13][14]. Group 3: Self-Reflection - Self-reflection is defined as the ability to confront one's inner self and gain insight into personal motivations and behaviors, which is crucial for personal growth [15][16]. - A strong self-reflection capability allows individuals to understand their true selves beyond external evaluations and societal expectations [15][16]. - Engaging in deep conversations and creating a safe environment for dialogue can enhance self-reflection and foster trust [17]. Group 4: Underlying Driving Forces - The article relates Maslow's hierarchy of needs to corporate development stages, which include survival, industry leadership, and mission-driven existence [18][19]. - Companies evolve through stages where their primary focus shifts from profit maximization to broader social missions, reflecting a higher level of organizational purpose [19][20]. - The concept of "connection" is highlighted as a key factor in understanding underlying driving forces, emphasizing the importance of relationships and altruism in achieving personal and organizational goals [22].