Core Viewpoint - The recent criminal enforcement actions against executives of Ruiskanda highlight a significant shift in regulatory practices in China's capital markets, emphasizing a trend towards harsher penalties for serious violations, including criminal charges for corporate misconduct [2][3][6]. Group 1: Regulatory Changes - The introduction of the new "National Nine Articles" in April 2024 has led to a notable increase in criminal enforcement actions against listed companies for severe violations [2][7]. - The regulatory framework now emphasizes a "three-punishment linkage" approach, combining administrative, civil, and criminal penalties for serious offenders [3][6]. Group 2: Case of Ruiskanda - Ruiskanda's chairman and a director have been subjected to criminal coercive measures due to allegations of violating disclosure laws, marking a significant escalation from previous administrative penalties [3][5]. - The company was previously fined 7.7 million yuan for inflating its financial performance through fraudulent practices between 2019 and 2020, including a reported revenue inflation of 351 million yuan in 2019 and 281 million yuan in 2020 [4][6]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The trend of criminal penalties for corporate misconduct is becoming more common, with several other companies facing similar actions, indicating a zero-tolerance policy from regulators [6][8]. - The criminal penalties are expected to have a stronger deterrent effect compared to administrative fines, as they can significantly impact the reputation and future opportunities of the offenders [8][10]. Group 4: Recommendations for Future Actions - Experts suggest increasing the severity of criminal penalties, particularly targeting key corporate figures such as controlling shareholders and executives, to ensure accountability [10]. - There is a call for stricter regulations on information disclosure to enhance transparency and protect investors, including the establishment of a credit evaluation system for listed companies [10].