行刑衔接

Search documents
从罚款到坐牢!A股大佬“栽了”,监管绝不手软
2 1 Shi Ji Jing Ji Bao Dao· 2025-07-09 11:32
Core Viewpoint - The recent criminal enforcement actions against executives of Ruiskanda highlight a significant shift in regulatory practices in China's capital markets, emphasizing a trend towards harsher penalties for serious violations, including criminal charges for corporate misconduct [2][3][6]. Group 1: Regulatory Changes - The introduction of the new "National Nine Articles" in April 2024 has led to a notable increase in criminal enforcement actions against listed companies for severe violations [2][7]. - The regulatory framework now emphasizes a "three-punishment linkage" approach, combining administrative, civil, and criminal penalties for serious offenders [3][6]. Group 2: Case of Ruiskanda - Ruiskanda's chairman and a director have been subjected to criminal coercive measures due to allegations of violating disclosure laws, marking a significant escalation from previous administrative penalties [3][5]. - The company was previously fined 7.7 million yuan for inflating its financial performance through fraudulent practices between 2019 and 2020, including a reported revenue inflation of 351 million yuan in 2019 and 281 million yuan in 2020 [4][6]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The trend of criminal penalties for corporate misconduct is becoming more common, with several other companies facing similar actions, indicating a zero-tolerance policy from regulators [6][8]. - The criminal penalties are expected to have a stronger deterrent effect compared to administrative fines, as they can significantly impact the reputation and future opportunities of the offenders [8][10]. Group 4: Recommendations for Future Actions - Experts suggest increasing the severity of criminal penalties, particularly targeting key corporate figures such as controlling shareholders and executives, to ensure accountability [10]. - There is a call for stricter regulations on information disclosure to enhance transparency and protect investors, including the establishment of a credit evaluation system for listed companies [10].
市场监管总局公布第二批市场监管服务型执法典型案例
Yang Shi Wang· 2025-06-30 02:18
【典型意义】 一是守护群众身边"关键小事"。电动自行车是群众日常出行的重要交通工具。本案执法部门通过查办一 起案件,指导规范充电桩企业合法合规经营,同时,从消费者关心关注的充电费用退赔入手,指导充电 桩企业将搭售服务费用全部退还,惠及群众15万余人次,有力维护了消费者合法权益。二是以"监管为 民"温度激发市场创新活力。电动自行车充电桩行业是近年来的新兴产业,技术迭代、盈利模式等尚未 成熟。本案执法部门全面深入调查违法行为发生的原因,综合考虑事实、性质、情节、社会危害程度, 兼顾本地区经济社会发展状况、电动自行车充电桩新兴行业的特点、主动退款消除危害后果等多方面因 素,依法不予行政处罚,既坚守了法律底线,又释放了监管善意、提振了发展信心。案后,执法部门系 统梳理企业诉求,深入企业、行业协会及发展改革委、住建、电力等主管部门开展调研,助力企业破解 发展瓶颈。 二、青岛骊龙葡萄酿酒有限公司假冒他人注册商标案 【基本案情】 2024年3月6日,山东省青岛市市场监管局收到法国香槟酒行业委员会有关侵犯其商标权的举报,随即启 动涉外知识产权保护快速响应机制,结合青岛市服务型执法标准体系相关规定,帮助举报人破解维权难 题,增 ...
从严打击证券犯罪 2024年北京受理各类证券期货犯罪捕诉案件量居全国首位
Zheng Quan Shi Bao Wang· 2025-05-15 10:58
(原标题:从严打击证券犯罪 2024年北京受理各类证券期货犯罪捕诉案件量居全国首位) 2025年5月15日是第七个"全国投资者保护宣传日"。当日,北京市人民检察院第三分院(下称"北京市检 三分院")召开"做强证券专业化检察、维护投资者合法权益,为资本市场健康稳定发展提供坚实法治保 障"新闻发布会。 会上,北京市检三分院党组成员、副检察长崔誉通报了北京办案基地2024年主要工作情况。基地发布了 4件依法从严打击证券犯罪典型案例。中国证券监督管理委员会北京监管局二级巡视员刘薇参加新闻发 布会,就北京地区证券期货监管执法情况、证券期货犯罪特点及发展趋势等相关工作进行了通报。 崔誉指出,2024年北京市检三分院共受理各类证券期货犯罪捕诉案件72件165人,办案量跃居全国首 位。 (发布会现场 郭博昊/摄) 从严打击违规信披、操纵市场等证券犯罪 北京市检三分院作为北京唯一一家证券期货犯罪检察办案基地,对北京市证券期货犯罪实施集中管辖。 记者注意到,北京市检三分院充分发挥法律监督职能作用,自2022年连续四年发布《检察机关证券期货 犯罪办案基地(北京)建设手册》,系统总结办案基地建设情况,依托办理案件和相关数据协助把脉金 ...