Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly state an investment rating for the industry or specific companies [37]. Core Insights - The report highlights that the market is currently favoring high volatility and high momentum stocks, while low momentum and low volatility stocks are also performing well [3][5][20]. - It notes that growth and unexpected growth financial factors are showing positive returns, indicating a preference for stocks with stable growth despite short-term performance challenges [17][22]. - The GRU factor's performance is mixed, with most models showing negative returns, except for the open1d model which has shown positive returns [18][29]. Summary by Sections Style Factor Tracking - The report indicates strong performance in volatility, valuation, and liquidity factors, while non-linear market capitalization, market capitalization, and growth factors are underperforming [15][1]. Overall Market Factor Performance - Basic financial factors show a divergence in returns, with static financial factors yielding negative returns, while growth and unexpected growth factors yield positive returns [17]. - Technical factors are performing positively overall, with high volatility and high momentum stocks leading the performance [17]. CSI 300 Component Stock Factor Performance - Basic financial factors within the CSI 300 show mostly positive returns, with valuation factors underperforming and growth factors performing strongly [20]. - Technical factors show a mixed performance, with momentum factors significantly underperforming while volatility factors are performing positively [20]. CSI 500 Component Stock Factor Performance - Basic financial factors show a divergence in returns, with unexpected growth factors performing well, while static financial factors yield mostly negative returns [22]. - Technical factors show a mixed performance, with momentum factors underperforming and volatility factors performing positively [22]. CSI 1000 Component Stock Factor Performance - Basic financial factors show a divergence in returns, with static financial factors yielding negative returns and unexpected growth factors yielding positive returns [24]. - Technical factors are performing negatively overall, with low momentum and low volatility stocks performing better [25]. Strategy Performance Tracking - The GRU long position strategy has shown strong performance, with excess returns relative to the CSI 1000 index ranging from 0.84% to 1.89% [29]. - The open1d model has shown a strong performance year-to-date, with an excess return of 6.08% relative to the CSI 1000 index [29].

Quantitative Models and Construction Methods 1. Model Name: GRU (Generalized Recurrent Unit) - **Model Construction Idea**: GRU models are used to capture temporal dependencies and patterns in financial data, leveraging recurrent neural network structures to predict stock performance or factor returns[3][4][5] - **Model Construction Process**: The GRU model is trained on historical stock data, incorporating features such as price movements, volume, and other technical indicators. Specific GRU-based models mentioned include: - **open1d**: Focuses on daily opening prices - **close1d**: Focuses on daily closing prices - **barra1d**: Integrates Barra-style risk factors for daily predictions - **barra5d**: Extends Barra-style risk factors to a 5-day horizon[5][6][25] - **Model Evaluation**: GRU models show mixed performance, with some models like open1d performing well, while others like barra1d and barra5d experience significant drawdowns in certain market conditions[5][6][25] --- Model Backtesting Results GRU Model Performance - **open1d**: - Weekly excess return: 1.22% - Monthly excess return: 2.58% - Year-to-date excess return: 6.08%[29][30] - **close1d**: - Weekly excess return: 1.89% - Monthly excess return: 2.91% - Year-to-date excess return: 4.14%[29][30] - **barra1d**: - Weekly excess return: 0.85% - Monthly excess return: 1.50% - Year-to-date excess return: 3.48%[29][30] - **barra5d**: - Weekly excess return: 0.84% - Monthly excess return: 2.25% - Year-to-date excess return: 5.59%[29][30] --- Quantitative Factors and Construction Methods 1. Factor Name: Barra Style Factors - **Factor Construction Idea**: Barra factors are designed to capture systematic risk exposures across various dimensions such as size, value, momentum, and volatility[13][14] - **Factor Construction Process**: - **Beta**: Historical beta of the stock - **Size**: Natural logarithm of total market capitalization - **Momentum**: Weighted average of historical excess returns, combining volatility, cumulative deviation, and residual volatility $ Momentum = 0.74 \cdot \text{Volatility} + 0.16 \cdot \text{Cumulative Deviation} + 0.1 \cdot \text{Residual Volatility} $ - **Volatility**: Weighted average of historical residual return volatilities - **Valuation**: Inverse of price-to-book ratio - **Liquidity**: Weighted average of turnover ratios (monthly, quarterly, yearly) - **Profitability**: Weighted average of analyst forecasted earnings yield, cash flow yield, and other profitability metrics - **Growth**: Weighted average of earnings and revenue growth rates - **Leverage**: Weighted average of market leverage, book leverage, and debt-to-asset ratio[14][15] - **Factor Evaluation**: Barra factors demonstrate varying performance across different market conditions, with some factors like volatility and liquidity showing strong returns, while others like size and growth exhibit weaker performance[15][16] 2. Factor Name: Technical Factors - **Factor Construction Idea**: Technical factors aim to capture price and volume-based patterns, focusing on momentum and volatility metrics[17][20][24] - **Factor Construction Process**: - **Momentum**: Calculated over different time horizons (e.g., 20-day, 60-day, 120-day) - **Volatility**: Measured as the standard deviation of returns over specific periods (e.g., 20-day, 60-day, 120-day) - **Median Deviation**: Captures the median absolute deviation of returns[27] - **Factor Evaluation**: High-momentum and high-volatility stocks generally outperform, but certain periods show negative returns for these factors, especially in the 120-day horizon[17][27] 3. Factor Name: Fundamental Factors - **Factor Construction Idea**: Fundamental factors are derived from financial statements, focusing on profitability, growth, and valuation metrics[17][20][24] - **Factor Construction Process**: - **Static Financial Metrics**: Return on equity (ROE), return on assets (ROA), and profit margins - **Growth Metrics**: Earnings growth, revenue growth, and cash flow growth - **Surprise Metrics**: Earnings and revenue surprises relative to analyst expectations[19][21][23] - **Factor Evaluation**: Growth and surprise factors perform well, while static financial metrics like ROA and ROE show weaker performance in certain periods[19][21][23] --- Factor Backtesting Results Barra Factors - **Volatility**: Weekly return: 0.75%, Monthly return: 2.73% - **Liquidity**: Weekly return: 0.68%, Monthly return: 1.37% - **Size**: Weekly return: -1.45%, Monthly return: -3.60%[15][16] Technical Factors - **20-day Momentum**: Weekly return: -1.81%, Monthly return: -6.16% - **60-day Volatility**: Weekly return: -1.79%, Monthly return: -0.74% - **120-day Momentum**: Weekly return: -1.68%, Monthly return: -0.80%[27] Fundamental Factors - **ROA Growth**: Weekly return: 0.23%, Monthly return: 1.31% - **Earnings Surprise**: Weekly return: 0.20%, Monthly return: 1.11% - **Revenue Growth**: Weekly return: 0.17%, Monthly return: 0.77%[19][21][23]