Workflow
Bootloader锁
icon
Search documents
奇葩,用户“抢手机跑路”只为解锁BL,小米不再“为发烧而生”
3 6 Ke· 2025-07-31 10:04
Core Viewpoint - The emergence of the "downgrade escape method" reflects a significant disconnect between Xiaomi and its core user base, particularly among tech enthusiasts who once supported the brand for its open approach to device customization [1][3][12]. Group 1: User Demand and Historical Context - Users have a strong demand for Bootloader unlocking, which is rooted in Xiaomi's history of allowing deep customization of its MIUI system, attracting a community of developers and tech enthusiasts [6][12]. - Xiaomi's initial commitment to allowing users to unlock and modify their devices was a key factor in building brand loyalty among tech-savvy consumers [6][12]. - The transition to the self-developed Surge OS has led to dissatisfaction among users, who find it less stable and more cluttered with ads compared to previous versions [6][7]. Group 2: Current Challenges and User Reactions - The stringent requirements for unlocking the Bootloader have led to the rise of a "unlocking industry" on platforms like Taobao, with some users paying over 8000 for unlocking services [8][12]. - Users have expressed their frustration through collective complaints, highlighting a perceived betrayal of Xiaomi's original promises regarding device control [10][12]. - The "downgrade escape method" is a risky response to the restrictive unlocking process, indicating a desperate attempt by users to regain control over their devices [17][19]. Group 3: Xiaomi's Business Logic - Xiaomi's tightening of Bootloader unlocking permissions is driven by security concerns, aiming to protect users from malicious software and data breaches as its user base expands [12][13]. - The company prioritizes the integrity and stability of its operating system, which is crucial for its broader "smart home" ecosystem strategy [13][15]. - The financial data indicates that Xiaomi's internet services, which include advertising revenue, are significantly more profitable than its hardware sales, influencing its decision to limit system modifications [14][15]. Group 4: Future Considerations - Xiaomi may need to explore more nuanced management strategies to address the needs of technically proficient users while maintaining system security [18][19]. - Improving the overall user experience of Surge OS could reduce the motivation for users to seek unauthorized modifications [18][19]. - Transparent communication regarding policy changes and their implications for different user groups could help mitigate dissatisfaction and restore trust [18][19].