So I also have another name and that name is not a lawyer. So I'm about to talk about some legal things but I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice. So imagine that you are doing some research.You really want to find something really really good. Maybe you're a student and your professor has said, "Get some peer-reviewed articles." Maybe you're a researcher yourself, but for whatever reason, you really want to have the best information possible. So, you're out there, you're on Google, maybe you're us ...

Katelyn Chedraoui Writer IKatelyn is a writer with CNET covering artificial intelligence, including chatbots, image and video generators. Her work explores how new AI technology is infiltrating our lives, shaping the content we consume on social media and affecting the people behind the screens. She graduated from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with a degree in media and journalism. You can reach her at kchedraoui@cnet.com. Expertise artificial intelligence, AI image generators, social me ...

India proposes charging OpenAI, Google for training AI on copyrighted content https://t.co/CzKCUlQhI9 ...

Core Viewpoint - India's proposal for a mandatory royalty system for AI companies training on copyrighted content could significantly alter the operational landscape for firms like OpenAI and Google in a rapidly growing market [1][3]. Group 1: Proposal Details - The Indian government has introduced a framework that allows AI companies to access copyrighted works for training in exchange for royalties paid to a new collecting body, which will distribute payments to creators [2][4]. - This "mandatory blanket license" aims to reduce compliance costs for AI firms while ensuring fair compensation for rights holders, including writers, musicians, and artists [5][6]. - The proposal is positioned as a solution to ongoing legal uncertainties regarding the use of copyrighted material for AI training, contrasting with the more fragmented approaches seen in the U.S. and EU [3][4]. Group 2: Market Context - India's significance as a market for generative AI tools is highlighted, with OpenAI's CEO noting that India is the company's second-largest market and may become the largest [6]. - The proposal is seen as a way to ensure that a portion of the revenue generated by AI firms from Indian users is returned to local creators [6]. Group 3: Industry Reactions - The proposal has faced dissent from industry bodies like Nasscom, which advocates for a text-and-data-mining exception instead of a mandatory licensing regime, arguing it could hinder innovation [12]. - The Business Software Alliance has also expressed concerns, suggesting that a licensing-only approach may not yield optimal outcomes and could limit the quality of AI models [13]. - The committee has dismissed the idea of a broad text-and-data-mining exception, proposing instead a hybrid model that grants automatic access to copyrighted works while requiring royalty payments [14]. Group 4: Next Steps - The Indian government has opened the proposal for public consultation, allowing stakeholders 30 days to provide feedback before finalizing recommendations [15].

A copyright case before the Supreme Court tests whether ISPs can punish subscribers for music piracy without throttling innocent customers, @StepCarter writes (via @opinion) https://t.co/5OJhhLtLOv ...

OpenAI Ordered to Hand Over 20M ChatGPT Logs in NYT Copyright Case► https://t.co/s8eUmNkkU0 https://t.co/s8eUmNkkU0 ...

Legal & Regulatory - US Supreme Court considered strengthening internet providers' protection from copyright liability related to customer piracy [1] - A $1 billion (十亿) music industry copyright lawsuit against Cox Communications Inc was questioned [1]

Core Insights - The world's largest music companies have licensed their works to Klay, a music startup developing an AI-driven streaming service that allows users to remake songs [1][2] - Klay is the first music AI service to secure agreements with all three major record labels: Universal Music Group, Sony Music, and Warner Music Group [2] - Klay's platform will combine streaming service features with AI technology, enabling users to recreate songs in various styles [3] Company Positioning - Klay positions itself as an ally to the music industry, ensuring that artists and labels maintain control over the usage of their works [4] - The leadership team includes music producer Ary Attie and former executives from Sony Music and Google's DeepMind [4] Industry Context - The music industry is currently navigating challenges with AI companies, having previously filed lawsuits against firms like Suno Inc. and Udio for copyright infringement [5] - Major music services, including Spotify and YouTube, are also developing AI tools, indicating a broader industry trend towards embracing AI technology while managing copyright concerns [6] Recent Developments - The record industry is actively engaging in deal-making related to AI, with Universal Music and Warner Music settling lawsuits against Udio and licensing their works for upcoming products [7] - Stability AI has also entered into agreements with major labels, while Suno, valued at $2.4 billion, remains without a deal with any major label [7]

Suno has faced some industry pushback, with the Recording Industry Association of America and major record labels suing it for allegedly training its AI tool on copyrighted songs.https://t.co/H1fEAWZCw9 https://t.co/ERNsK2IitL ...

ChatGPT’s Use of Song Lyrics Violates Copyright, Munich Court Finds► https://t.co/8eyUVAXt1V https://t.co/8eyUVAXt1V ...