融资租赁的金融杠杆作用充分地发挥了融资方、制造商、用户方的优势与资源，不仅惠及新能源汽车的消费者，同样也是企业的福音。充分回避风险， 使用户买得起车，厂商及时拿到货款，而融资租赁方则能获得稳定的现金流。融资租赁作为服务实体经济的一种创新金融工具，可以将"所有权"和"使用 权"分离，减轻消费者的"所有权顾虑"和"里程担忧"。此外，还可以促进公共交通领域的新能源汽车采购以及车辆共享这样的创新模式。因此，国家鼓励 采用融资租赁的方式大力推广新能源汽车。 融资租赁模式是加快新能源汽车推广的催化剂，但融资租赁模式对于国内市场来说还是一个新兴事物，两者的合作方式尚存如下问题: （1）租赁物稳定性差，残值不确定 （2）经营风险高，资金缺口较大 融资租赁业务有7%-8%资金使用成本，还要面临下游客户违约的问题，经营风险较高。从我国现行融资租赁行业及公司的管理体制看,用于融资租赁投资 流转的资金超过八成都是来自银行,而且大都是以融资租赁公司向银行申请的短期贷款为主要的拆借方式。从某种角度上讲,真正能够获得较大金额银行信 贷或者可以直接与银行形成战略合作关系进而享受较低利率的融资租赁公司少之又少，因此需要拓宽汽车融资租赁业的融资 ...

Core Insights - The financing leasing market in Guangdong Province benefits from strong government support, optimized regional layout, cross-border cooperation advantages, robust industrial foundation, abundant financial resources, innovative and diversified development models, and comprehensive talent and organizational guarantees, contributing to its high-quality development and significant role in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area and nationwide [1] Group 1: Market Overview - As of June 2024, Guangdong Province has 2,869 financing leasing companies, accounting for 33.09% of the national total, making it the only province with a share exceeding 30% [4] - The financing leasing market in Guangdong has a high market concentration, with leading companies including Guoyin Financial Leasing, China Communications Leasing (Guangzhou), and Far East Horizon (Guangzhou) [9] Group 2: Investment Scale - The total investment scale of financing leasing in Guangdong Province for 2024 is projected to be 221.072 billion yuan, representing a year-on-year decrease of 17.21% [5] - The primary investment areas for 2024 include urban investment, automotive, IT, air transportation, and wind power generation, with urban investment exceeding 20 billion yuan [6]

Core Viewpoint - The financing lease model, which integrates trade, credit, financing, and asset utilization, has been developing in China for over 30 years, providing benefits to both lessors and lessees, but it faces challenges such as increased disputes and lessee defaults, particularly in rent arrears and unauthorized disposal of leased assets [1] Group 1: Lessee Default and Lessor Remedies - Lessor's remedy for lessee default includes requesting full payment of overdue rent, with the right to demand all unpaid rent if the lessee fails to pay within a reasonable period after notice [2] - The core remedy for lessor in case of lessee default is to terminate the contract and reclaim the leased asset, which requires sending a termination notice to the lessee [3] - Lessor's priority right to compensation from the value of leased assets is a crucial mechanism for debt recovery, allowing them to claim proceeds from the sale of leased assets to cover unpaid rent and other fees [5][6] Group 2: Special Circumstances and Lessor Strategies - Non-rent defaults, such as unauthorized disposal or improper use of leased assets, can also occur, and if deemed a fundamental breach, the lessor may accelerate rent payment or terminate the contract [7] - In cases where the lessee faces other debt disputes, the risk of forced execution on leased assets exists, and the lessor's ability to prevent this largely depends on whether proper registration has been completed [8] Group 3: Judicial Considerations in Lessee Default - In judicial practice regarding financing lease disputes, the focus should be on whether the lessor's claims align with the principle of "one choice exercise," avoiding double recovery [9] - The court should assess whether the lessee's actions constitute a fundamental breach, particularly in cases where the lessee has made substantial rent payments or provided alternative guarantees [10]