Disclaimer The information contained in this presentation is only a summary and does not purport to be complete. This presentation has been prepared solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as financial, legal, tax, accounting, investment or other advice or a recommendation with respect to any investment. This presentation does not constitute or form part of any offer or invitation for sale or subscription of or solicitation or invitation of any offer to buy or subscribe for any securit ...

Core Insights - PLAY experienced a significant decrease in passenger numbers, carrying 124,587 passengers in July 2025 compared to 187,835 in July 2024, primarily due to a strategic shift in fleet deployment and ACMI leasing agreements [1] - Despite the reduced capacity, the load factor improved to 90.3% from 88.4% in July 2024, indicating strong demand and effective capacity management, particularly in leisure destinations [2] - The operational performance remained solid with an on-time performance of 85.6%, slightly up from 85.4% in July 2024, showcasing the company's focus on operational efficiency [3] Fleet and Route Strategy - PLAY launched its inaugural flight to Valencia, marking its eighth destination in Spain, alongside existing routes to Alicante, Barcelona, Madrid, Malaga, Tenerife, Fuerteventura, and Gran Canaria [4] - The airline also offers flights to four destinations in Portugal: Lisbon, Porto, Faro, and Madeira, reinforcing its commitment to being a leading leisure airline from Iceland [4] Management Commentary - The CEO of PLAY highlighted the positive indicators from the core network strategy, noting the increase in load factor and strong demand despite the transitional period with part of the fleet in ACMI operations [5] - The CEO emphasized the team's efforts in achieving an on-time performance of 85.6% during a peak travel month, reflecting the company's focus on operational excellence [6]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The second quarter revenue decreased year over year by 0.7% to $817.1 million, with operating ratio at 87.8% compared to 83.3% in the same quarter last year [5][14][18] - Revenue per shipment excluding fuel surcharge increased by 2.7% to $298.71, while including fuel surcharge it increased by 1.8% to $351.36 [14][18] - Total operating expenses increased by 4.7% year over year, with salaries, wages, and benefits rising by 5% due to inflationary pressures [15][18] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - Overall shipments for workdays were down 2.8% year over year, with tonnage only up 0.4% from the first quarter [6][8] - Newer terminals (opened less than three years) saw a 4% sequential improvement in shipments per workday compared to the first quarter [7] - Legacy facilities (open longer than three years) experienced a 2% sequential increase in shipments compared to the first quarter, but down 3.5% year over year [7] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company noted muted volume trends due to the macroeconomic landscape, with overall shipment trends reflecting cautious customer approaches [6][8] - The Los Angeles region showed softer trends, impacting overall performance [9][52] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focused on optimizing variable costs and improving network efficiency while maintaining a customer-centric approach [5][10] - There is an emphasis on getting closer to customers and providing unique solutions, which is part of the long-term strategy [21][22] - The company plans to continue investing in network expansion and technology to enhance operational efficiency [17][23] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed confidence in the company's ability to adapt to the dynamic environment, despite the lack of typical volume increases in the second quarter [20] - The focus remains on controllable factors, with a commitment to maintaining high service levels and managing costs effectively [10][20] - Future growth is anticipated as the company continues to mature its facilities and optimize its network [11][106] Other Important Information - The company plans to spend approximately $600 million to $650 million in capital expenditures this year, focusing on network expansion and technology investments [17][99] - The cargo claims ratio was reported at 0.5, indicating effective management of claims [10] Q&A Session Summary Question: Outlook on volumes and pricing for Q3 - Management indicated that tonnage comparisons will become tougher due to new terminal openings last year, but they expect to maintain pricing discipline [26][27] Question: Labor reductions and wage increases - Management clarified that wage increases typically occur in the second half of the year, and headcount adjustments are made to align with volume levels [35][36] Question: Industry capacity and pricing recovery - Management believes that LTL capacity is shrinking over time, and they are well-positioned to leverage their investments in the upcoming market recovery [44][46] Question: Volume trends in July - July tonnage is trending flat, with shipments per day down about 2.25%, reflecting ongoing cautiousness in the market [51][52] Question: Contractual renewals and competitive pricing - The 5.1% renewal rate is lower than previous periods, but management emphasized that the pricing environment remains rational and focused on service quality [58][60] Question: Cost management and operating leverage - Management noted that while some cost actions are tactical, they are also building long-term structural gains through network optimization [67][70] Question: Pricing environment and legacy freight - Management is optimistic about pricing opportunities as they continue to optimize their network and improve service levels [73][75]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The second quarter revenue decreased by 0.7% year over year to $817.1 million, with operating ratio at 87.8% compared to 83.3% in the same quarter last year [4][13] - Revenue per shipment excluding fuel surcharge increased by 2.7% to $298.71, while including fuel surcharge, it increased by 1.8% to $351.36 [13] - Total operating expenses increased by 4.7% year over year, with salaries, wages, and benefits rising by 5% due to inflationary pressures [14][15] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - Tonnage increased by 1.1% year over year, driven by a 4% increase in average weight per shipment, but overall shipments were down 2.8% [14][5] - Newer terminals (opened less than three years) saw a 4% sequential improvement in shipments per workday compared to the first quarter [6] - Legacy facilities experienced a 2% sequential increase in shipments compared to the first quarter, but down 3.5% year over year [6] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - Overall shipments for workdays were down 2.8% year over year, reflecting cautious customer behavior amid economic uncertainty [5][6] - The Los Angeles region showed muted trends, contributing to shorter length of haul and lower weight per shipment compared to the first quarter [9] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company focuses on optimizing variable costs and improving network efficiency while maintaining a customer-centric approach [4][10] - There is an emphasis on expanding the national footprint and enhancing service levels to compete effectively in the industry [11][21] - The company plans to invest approximately $600 million to $650 million in capital expenditures this year to support long-term growth [16] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed confidence in the long-term prospects of the company despite current economic challenges, highlighting the importance of customer service and operational efficiency [20][21] - The company is adapting to the changing economic landscape while maintaining discipline around cost structures [11][21] - Management noted that the operating performance remains strong, with expectations for continued improvement as the market conditions evolve [19][20] Other Important Information - The cargo claims ratio for the quarter was 0.5, indicating effective management of customer service and operational execution [10] - The company reduced headcount by about 4.2% from March to June to align with volume trends [11] Q&A Session Summary Question: Volume expectations for Q3 and pricing outlook - Management indicated that volume comparisons will become tougher due to new terminal openings last year, but they expect to maintain pricing discipline [25][27] Question: Labor reductions and wage increases - Wage increases typically occur in the second half of the year, and headcount adjustments are made to align with volume changes [33][35] Question: Industry capacity and pricing implications - Management believes that LTL capacity is likely to remain constrained, which could support pricing in a recovery [41][44] Question: Volume trends in July and customer insights - July tonnage is trending flat, with no significant changes in customer behavior compared to June [50][51] Question: Contract renewals and competitive pricing - The 5.1% renewal rate reflects the competitive nature of the market, but management remains focused on maintaining fair compensation for services [55][57] Question: Network optimization actions - Management highlighted improvements in routing and density as key actions taken to optimize the national network [76][78] Question: Long-term operational goals - Management expressed a commitment to achieving a sub-80% operating ratio through continued focus on customer service and operational efficiency [119]