Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issue of formalism in the use of PowerPoint presentations (PPT) within certain departments, indicating that the focus on creating visually appealing presentations detracts from actual work and service to the public [1]. Group 1: Issues Identified - Some grassroots officials express frustration that significant time is spent on designing attractive PPTs instead of serving the community and implementing concrete actions [1]. - The tendency to prioritize presentation aesthetics over substance has increased the burden on grassroots workers, leading to wastefulness and a departure from a pragmatic work style [1]. Group 2: Government Response - The Central Committee of the Communist Party and the State Council have issued regulations aimed at reducing formalism and bureaucratic practices, emphasizing the need for substantial achievements over superficial packaging [1]. - The focus of these regulations is to establish a correct view of performance, promoting genuine efforts and practical results rather than mere presentation [1].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issue of "formalism" in the use of PowerPoint presentations (PPT) within government sectors, emphasizing the need for reform to reduce unnecessary burdens on grassroots workers [1][2] Group 1: Issues Identified - PPT has transformed from a tool for efficiency into a new variant of formalism, leading to excessive focus on presentation aesthetics rather than substantive content [1] - Some local units still evaluate performance based on the quality of PPT presentations, which can lead to increased workloads and superficial work styles [1][2] - Grassroots workers express frustration over the time spent on creating visually appealing PPTs instead of focusing on actual work, with some even outsourcing the task to third-party agencies [1] Group 2: Proposed Solutions - The article calls for a shift in performance evaluation criteria from "appearance" and "presentation" to "responsibility" and "actual results" [2] - It advocates for reducing unnecessary formalities that do not contribute to work effectiveness or public interest, allowing grassroots workers to focus more on addressing pressing community needs [2] - Digitalization should be leveraged as a tool for practical efficiency rather than a means of perpetuating formalism, promoting a culture of genuine effort and tangible outcomes [2]