Core Viewpoint - The debate over whether stablecoins should be allowed to pay yield is a significant issue that reflects broader changes in the U.S. financial system, focusing on consumer deposits and who benefits from them [1][2][6]. Group 1: Stablecoins and Consumer Deposits - The discussion surrounding yield-bearing stablecoins is fundamentally about deposits and the distribution of economic benefits derived from them [2][6]. - Historically, consumer deposits in the U.S. have earned little to no interest, with banks utilizing these deposits for lending and investment, thus capturing the majority of the economic upside [3][4]. - The traditional banking model has remained stable due to a lack of realistic alternatives for consumers, but advancements in technology are beginning to change this dynamic [4][5]. Group 2: Shifts in Consumer Expectations - There is a notable shift in consumer expectations regarding money, with a growing belief that balances should earn returns by default rather than as an exclusive feature for sophisticated investors [5][6]. - As this expectation becomes more widespread, it is likely to extend beyond stablecoins to all forms of digital value representation, challenging the notion that consumer balances should inherently yield low returns [6]. Group 3: Banking System Concerns - Banks argue that allowing consumers to earn yield directly on their balances could lead to a reduction in deposits within the banking system, potentially harming credit availability and financial stability [7]. - This concern is rooted in the historical role of banks as the primary conduit for transforming household savings into credit for the economy [7].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that stablecoin issuers and distributors may be creating a parallel banking ecosystem that mimics traditional banking operations without the necessary regulatory safeguards [1][2][6] - JPMorgan's CFO, Jeremy Barnum, expressed concerns about the risks associated with stablecoin yield offerings, highlighting the potential for these to affect system-wide deposits and the flow of funds [2][5] - The U.S. Senate Banking Committee has introduced a draft legislation aimed at regulating crypto markets, which includes provisions to restrict how crypto companies can offer yield rewards on stablecoin deposits [3][4] Group 2 - The proposed legislation would prevent stablecoin issuers and crypto platforms from directly offering yield unless tied to specific activities like staking [4] - Barnum emphasized the need for appropriate regulation in the crypto space, questioning how these innovations improve consumer experience and suggesting that traditional banks may need to enhance their service offerings in response [6]

Stablecoin yield doesn’t have to rely on emissions or leverage.This thread explains how @Neutrl separates stability from yield and scales with reserves > supply, using OTC and derivatives market structure 👇faustiancreek (@faustiancreek):Neutrl is a synthetic dollar protocol turning structural inefficiencies into market-neutral yield ⚖️❌ Emissions❌ Leverage❌ Directional bets✅ Pure spread capture ...

Core Viewpoint - A coalition of over 125 cryptocurrency companies and advocacy groups is actively opposing US banking lobbyists regarding the rights to pay interest on stablecoin deposits, highlighting a significant conflict between traditional banking and the crypto industry [1][5]. Group 1: Banking Lobby's Position - The GENIUS Act currently prohibits stablecoin issuers from paying dividends, but a loophole allows third-party platforms to pass stablecoin yields to users, prompting banks to lobby for closing this loophole [2]. - Banking groups argue that allowing unregulated fintech platforms to offer high yields on cash-equivalent tokens poses systemic risks, potentially leading to a capital flight of up to $6.6 trillion from commercial banks to digital asset platforms [3]. - They contend that such a shift would undermine the capital base necessary for banks to underwrite mortgages and business loans, resulting in increased borrowing costs for American households [4]. Group 2: Crypto Coalition's Response - The crypto coalition has urged lawmakers to reject attempts to expand the scope of the GENIUS Act, arguing that reopening this issue would undermine the predictability of regulatory frameworks and introduce unnecessary risks [5][6]. - They dismiss the banks' concerns as a protectionist effort to maintain a monopoly on low-interest deposits, claiming that banks are trying to protect their profit margins by preventing consumers from accessing higher yields available in the Treasury market [6]. - The coalition argues that stablecoin reward programs allow platforms to share value directly with users, enabling households to benefit from higher rates rather than suffering losses due to inflation [7].

RT Axal (@getaxal)The Axal App is now available on iOS and Google Play soon.Earn real yield, on your terms.Secure, permissionless stablecoin yield. In one click.Download below ⬇ https://t.co/SDdrGFu2X3 ...