本次报告会特别邀请上海国家会计学院应用经济系主任、全国知名财税专家葛玉御博士作专题分享。葛 玉御紧扣《增值税法》实施后的征管新要求，深入剖析了代账机构在发票管理、收入核算等核心业务环 节的合规边界，针对虚开发票等隐蔽性风险点，通过"以案说法"的方式拆解典型违法套路，生动阐释合 规经营的重要性。"合规是行业发展的生命线，任何筹划都不能逾越法律红线。"葛玉御的报告兼具理论 深度与实践指导性，参训学员纷纷表示收获颇丰、深受启发。 徐州经贸高职校的会计专业是学校传统品牌优势专业，开设于1964年，文化内涵深厚，师资力量雄厚， 办学成果丰硕，为社会培养输送大批优秀毕业生，为区域经济发展提供人才支撑和智力支持。该专业先 后被评为国家示范重点建设专业、江苏省品牌专业、江苏省示范专业、江苏联合职业技术学院重点建设 专业，会计专业群被评为江苏省现代化专业群；会计实训基地被认定为江苏省职业教育实训基地、江苏 省高水平示范性实训基地、江苏省现代化实训基地、全国数智实践基地、全国云财务职教集团特色产教 融合实训基地；经贸正保协同育人智能会计创新平台获评江苏省校企合作示范组合培育项目。 作为深化产教融合、服务地方经济的重要实践，此次活 ...

欢迎扫描下方二维码关注： | 分或者纳入负面信用记录(第一 、二项情形除 | | --- | | 外); | | 2 情节较重或者逾期不改正的,由主管税务机 | | 关列为重点监管对象,扣减信用积分、降低信 | | 用等级或者纳入负面信用记录(第一、二项情 | | 形除外),向委托人及委托人所在地主管税务 | | 机关进行风险提示; | | 3 情节严重的,由主管税务机关列为涉税服务 | | 失信主体予以公告,向委托人及委托人所在地 | | 主管税务机关进行风险提示,所代理的涉税业 | | 务应当由其与委托人共同到税务机关现场办 | | 理: | | ) 使用税务师事务所名称未办理行政登记 | | 的: | | = ) 提供涉税专业服务但未按规定报送涉税 | | 专业服务机构及涉税服务人员基本信息 | | 的; | | 未按规定报送涉税专业服务业务委托协 | | 议、业务信息的; | | (四) 报送的基本信息、业务委托协议及业务 | | 信息与实际不符的; | | (五)) 妨害税务机关依照本办法履行职责的; | | (六) 未以涉税服务人员身份,而以委托方办 | | 税人员身份办理业务,或者存在其他不 | ...

Regulatory Compliance - UK requires crypto exchanges to collect detailed transactional information from UK customers, effective January 1, 2026 [1] - The new guidelines aim to increase tax compliance within the UK crypto market [1]

Bybit teams up with @Taxbit to simplify global tax compliance under CARF and the EU’s DAC8 directive.🌍This partnership ensures seamless, automated reporting — so users can trade confidently while staying compliant.Learn more: https://t.co/gLJcTTTsO4#Bybit #CryptoArk https://t.co/53rh5JxfhV ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of compliance and self-regulation within tax professional service institutions to enhance integrity and trustworthiness in the industry [6][11]. Group 1: Compliance and Internal Control - Tax professional service institutions should strengthen compliance construction, improve internal control systems, and establish quality management and risk control mechanisms [6]. - A business record system should be established to document the execution process and create working papers, ensuring that tax reports and documents are signed and stamped before delivery to clients [7]. Group 2: Professional Development and Education - Institutions should support tax service personnel in participating in continuing education and training to maintain their professional competence [8]. Group 3: Client Education and Tax Compliance - Tax service institutions and personnel should enhance tax law promotion and guidance for clients to improve tax compliance [9]. Group 4: Tax Authority Management and Support - Tax authorities should implement administrative registration management for tax service institutions and establish a comprehensive management mechanism for tax professional services [11]. - The use of information technology to enhance management and service levels, including data integration, intelligent analysis, risk alerts, real-time monitoring, and information push functions, is recommended [12]. Group 5: Risk Management and Supervision - Tax authorities should conduct risk management for tax service institutions and personnel, monitoring compliance and addressing violations [12]. - Regular inspections of tax service institutions should include evaluations of internal systems, qualifications, and compliance with service norms [12].

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry. Core Insights - The paper finds that stronger firm digitalization is associated with higher tax revenues across countries, with a one-standard-deviation increase in firm digitalization linked to an increase in tax revenues-to-GDP by up to 3 percentage points, conditional on the level of digitalization of tax administration (GovTech) [3][12][17] - Firm digitalization significantly improves tax compliance among high-risk taxpayers, such as small and informal enterprises, particularly in the service sector, indicating that digitalization broadens the corporate tax base and enhances compliance [3][12][14] - There is a significant synergy between firm digitalization and GovTech, underscoring the importance of promoting both to enhance tax collection [3][12][14] Summary by Sections Introduction - The benefits of government digitalization (GovTech) for tax collection have been well acknowledged, with empirical studies showing that digitalizing tax administration can enhance revenue collection significantly [9] - The relationship between firm digitalization and tax revenues remains largely unexplored, necessitating further research to understand its potential impact on tax collection [10][11] Literature Review - A long-standing literature documents benefits from firm digitalization, including higher growth and resilience to shocks, but the impact on tax revenues is less understood [16][18] - Policies to foster firm digitalization include upgrading internet infrastructure and promoting IT skills, which are essential for enhancing tax compliance [19] Empirical Analyses - The report employs both country-level and firm-level analyses to investigate the relationship between firm digitalization and tax revenues [21][22] - Country-level evidence shows that countries with stronger firm digitalization have higher tax revenues, with a strong positive correlation between business digitalization and tax revenues [23][28] - Firm-level evidence indicates that firm digitalization is associated with a higher probability of paying taxes and larger tax payments, particularly in emerging markets and developing economies [49][58] Conclusions - The findings suggest a dual approach of promoting both GovTech and firm digitalization to enhance tax revenues, highlighting that investments in digitalization will yield future tax revenue increases [14][15]