Shares of The Trade Desk (NASDAQ: TTD) jumped on the news that the company will be added to the S&P 500 index.In pre-market trading on Tuesday, the stock was up 14.05% to $86. The TTD share price closed the last trading session at $75.43, reflecting a year-to-date loss of almost 36%. TTD one-day stock price chart. Source: Google FinanceThe stock is set to start trading on the index at market opening on July 18. The American real-time programmatic marketing company is replacing Ansys following its acquisitio ...

NEW YORK, July 15, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Nexxen International Ltd. (NASDAQ: NEXN) (“Nexxen” or the “Company”), a global, flexible advertising technology platform with deep expertise in data and advanced TV, today announced it anticipates benefitting from the announcement that Vestel recently entered a strategic partnership with VIDAA, the world’s second largest and fastest-growing smart TV platform. Nexxen has a strategic partnership with VIDAA, which is set to expire at the end of 2026, and currently ho ...

Shares of AppLovin (APP 6.25%) were among the winners today after the fast-growing ad tech company received an endorsement from Citigroup, which called it a top pick.That news was enough to send the stock up 6.5% as of 3:05 p.m. ET. AppLovin gets a boostAppLovin has been volatile. The stock, which was a breakout winner last year, is now up against high expectations in a chaotic advertising and economic environment.However, Citi's note today clearly gave the stock a boost. The bank reaffirmed AppLovin as a t ...

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. common stock during the specified class period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought DoubleVerify common stock between November 10, 2023, and February 27, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by July 21, 2025 [3]. Group 2: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that DoubleVerify made false and misleading statements regarding its business operations, including the shift of ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, which limited its technological capabilities [5]. - It is claimed that DoubleVerify's ability to monetize its high-margin advertising optimization services was significantly hampered due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms [5]. - The lawsuit also states that DoubleVerify's competitors were better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings, negatively impacting DoubleVerify's competitive edge and profitability [5]. - Additional allegations include systematic overbilling of customers for ad impressions served to declared bots and misleading risk disclosures that characterized adverse facts as mere possibilities [5].

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. alleging securities fraud affecting investors between November 10, 2023, and February 27, 2025 [1] Group 1: Allegations of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit claims that DoubleVerify's customers are shifting ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, limiting the company's technological capabilities and increasing competition from platforms like Meta and Amazon [2] - It is alleged that DoubleVerify's ability to monetize its Activation Services is constrained due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms [2] - The complaint states that monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services on certain closed platforms could take several years [2] - Competitors are reportedly better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, negatively impacting DoubleVerify's competitive edge and profitability [2] - The company is accused of systematically overbilling customers for ad impressions served to declared bots from known data center server farms [2] - The risk disclosures provided by DoubleVerify are claimed to be materially false and misleading, presenting adverse facts as mere possibilities [2] - As a result of these issues, the lawsuit asserts that the positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects were materially false or lacked a reasonable basis [2] Group 2: Next Steps for Affected Investors - Investors who suffered losses in DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. during the specified timeframe have until July 21, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff [3] - Participation in the lawsuit does not require serving as a lead plaintiff, and class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs [3] Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and has extensive expertise in complex securities litigation [4] - The firm has been recognized in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report for seven consecutive years as one of the leading securities litigation firms in the United States [4]

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. alleging securities fraud affecting investors between November 10, 2023, and February 27, 2025 [1] Group 1: Allegations of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit claims that DoubleVerify's customers are shifting ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's technological capabilities are limited [2] - It is alleged that DoubleVerify's ability to monetize its Activation Services is constrained due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms [2] - The complaint states that monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services on certain closed platforms would take several years [2] - Competitors are reportedly better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, negatively impacting DoubleVerify's competitive edge and profits [2] - The company is accused of systematically overbilling customers for ad impressions served to declared bots from known data center server farms [2] - DoubleVerify's risk disclosures are claimed to be materially false and misleading, presenting adverse facts as mere possibilities [2] - As a result of these issues, the lawsuit asserts that the defendants' positive statements regarding the company's business and prospects were materially false or lacked a reasonable basis [2] Group 2: Next Steps for Affected Investors - Investors who suffered losses in DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. during the specified timeframe have until July 21, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff [3] - Participation in the lawsuit does not require serving as a lead plaintiff, and class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs [3] Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and has extensive expertise in complex securities litigation [4] - The firm has been recognized in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report for seven consecutive years as one of the leading securities litigation firms in the United States [4]

NEW YORK, July 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of common stock of DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: DV) between November 10, 2023 and February 27, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important July 21, 2025 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased DoubleVerify common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency f ...

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. regarding a class action lawsuit due to alleged misleading statements and failure to disclose critical information during the class period from November 10, 2023, to February 27, 2025 [1][3]. Allegations - The complaint alleges that DoubleVerify's customers shifted ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's technological capabilities were limited, impacting its competitive position against platforms like Meta and Amazon [3]. - It is claimed that the monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services was hindered by the high costs and time required to develop technology for closed platforms, which were not adequately disclosed to investors [3]. - The lawsuit states that it would take several years for DoubleVerify's Activation Services related to certain closed platforms to become profitable [3]. - Competitors were reportedly better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, negatively affecting DoubleVerify's competitiveness and profitability [3]. - The company allegedly overbilled customers for ad impressions served to bots operating from known data centers [3]. - The risk disclosures provided by DoubleVerify were said to be materially false and misleading, as they downplayed already materialized adverse facts [3]. - As a result of these issues, the positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects were claimed to be materially false or misleading [3]. Next Steps for Shareholders - Shareholders who purchased shares of DoubleVerify during the specified class period are encouraged to register for the class action by July 21, 2025, to potentially become lead plaintiffs [4]. - Once registered, shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software regarding the status of the case [4].

Core Viewpoint - Kuehn Law, PLLC is investigating potential breaches of fiduciary duties by officers and directors of DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. related to misrepresentation and failure to disclose critical information affecting shareholders [1]. Group 1: Allegations of Misrepresentation - Insiders at DoubleVerify allegedly caused the company to misrepresent customer behavior, specifically that customers were shifting ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where DoubleVerify's technological capabilities were limited [2]. - The company’s ability to monetize its Activation Services was reportedly constrained due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms, which were not adequately disclosed to investors [2]. - It is claimed that monetization of Activation Services in connection with certain closed platforms would take several years, contrary to what was communicated to shareholders [2]. Group 2: Competitive Position and Billing Issues - DoubleVerify's competitors are said to be better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, raising concerns about the company's competitive edge [2]. - The company allegedly overbilled customers for ad impressions served to declared bots operating from known data center server farms, which raises ethical and operational concerns [2]. Group 3: Misleading Risk Disclosures - The risk disclosures provided by DoubleVerify were characterized as materially false and misleading, as they downplayed adverse facts that had already materialized [2]. - Positive statements regarding the company's business, operations, and prospects were claimed to be materially false or misleading, lacking a reasonable basis [2].

NEW YORK, July 10, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The Gross Law Firm issues the following notice to shareholders of DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: DV).Shareholders who purchased shares of DV during the class period listed are encouraged to contact the firm regarding possible lead plaintiff appointment. Appointment as lead plaintiff is not required to partake in any recovery.CONTACT US HERE:https://securitiesclasslaw.com/securities/doubleverify-holdings-inc-loss-submission-form-2/?id=156031&from=4CLASS PERIOD: Nov ...