Every few years, a statistic captures the climate debate and briefly dominates headlines. The latest one comes from an analysis highlighted by Inside Climate News, claiming that just 32 companies are responsible for roughly half of global carbon dioxide emissions. It is a striking figure. It is also deeply unconstructive. Not because the data is wrong, but because the conclusion many draw from it has very little to do with how emissions can actually be reduced in a complex, fast-changing global energy ...

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against Ramaco Resources, Inc. due to allegations of misleading statements regarding the company's mining activities, particularly at the Brook Mine, which has led to a significant drop in stock price [3][5][6]. Group 1: Legal Investigation - The firm is reminding investors of the March 31, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action against Ramaco [3]. - The complaint alleges that Ramaco and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false statements and failing to disclose the lack of significant mining activity at the Brook Mine [5]. - Wolfpack Research published a report claiming that the Brook Mine is a "hoax" and that no active mining has occurred since its groundbreaking in July 2025, leading to a 9.6% drop in Ramaco's stock price on October 23, 2025 [6]. Group 2: Investor Communication - Faruqi & Faruqi encourages investors who suffered losses in Ramaco to contact them directly to discuss their legal options [1][8]. - The firm is also seeking information from whistleblowers, former employees, and shareholders regarding Ramaco's conduct [8].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Ramaco Resources, Inc. (NASDAQ: METC) for allegedly misleading investors about the development progress of its projects, particularly the Brook Mine in Wyoming, leading to a significant drop in stock price following the revelation of these claims [1]. Company Overview - Ramaco Resources, Inc. is headquartered in Lexington, Kentucky, and operates coal and mineral development projects in the United States [1]. Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit pertains to investors who purchased Ramaco securities between July 31, 2025, and October 23, 2025, with a deadline of March 31, 2026, for potential lead plaintiff appointments [1]. - The complaint alleges that Ramaco overstated development progress at the Brook Mine, which was described as a "hoax" and a "Potemkin Mine" by Wolfpack Research, indicating no significant mining activity had occurred since its groundbreaking [1]. Stock Market Impact - Following the report by Wolfpack Research on October 23, 2025, Ramaco's stock price fell by $3.81, nearly 10%, closing at $36.01 per share, with unusually high trading volume [1].

Core Viewpoint - Ramaco Resources, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit due to allegations of issuing materially false and misleading statements regarding its mining activities at the Brook Mine during the class period from July 31, 2025, to October 23, 2025 [1] Group 1: Allegations - The lawsuit claims that Ramaco did not commence any significant mining activity at the Brook Mine after groundbreaking [1] - It is alleged that no active work was taking place at the Brook Mine, leading to an overstatement of development progress [1] - The positive statements made by the company about its business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and lacked a reasonable basis [1] Group 2: Class Action Details - The deadline for shareholders to register for the class action and seek lead plaintiff status is March 31, 2026 [1] - Shareholders who purchased shares of METC during the specified class period are encouraged to contact the Gross Law Firm for potential lead plaintiff appointment [1] - Participation in the case does not require appointment as lead plaintiff, and there is no cost or obligation to participate [1]

Core Viewpoint - A class action has been filed against Ramaco Resources, Inc. for allegedly overstating development progress at its Brook Mine, with claims that no significant mining activity has occurred since its groundbreaking [1][2]. Allegations - The complaint states that Ramaco failed to disclose the lack of significant mining activity at the Brook Mine, which has not commenced after the groundbreaking [2]. - Wolfpack Research published a report alleging that the Brook Mine is a "hoax" and that no active mining has taken place, supported by drone footage showing no work occurring three months post-groundbreaking [3]. Stock Impact - Following the allegations and the report from Wolfpack Research, Ramaco's stock price dropped by $3.81, or 9.6%, closing at $36.01 per share on October 23, 2025 [3]. Shareholder Actions - Shareholders may be eligible to participate in the class action against Ramaco and can contact Robbins LLP for more information on serving as a lead plaintiff or remaining an absent class member [4].

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against Ramaco Resources, Inc. due to allegations of misleading statements regarding the company's mining activities, particularly at the Brook Mine, which has led to a significant drop in stock price [2][4][5]. Group 1: Legal Investigation - The law firm is encouraging investors who acquired Ramaco securities between July 31, 2025, and October 23, 2025, to discuss their legal rights and options [1]. - A federal securities class action has been filed against Ramaco, with a deadline of March 31, 2026, for investors to seek the role of lead plaintiff [2][6]. - The complaint alleges that Ramaco and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false statements and failing to disclose the lack of significant mining activity at the Brook Mine [4]. Group 2: Allegations and Impact - Wolfpack Research published a report claiming that Ramaco's Brook Mine is a "hoax" and has not been actively mined since its groundbreaking in July 2025, suggesting that the mine was built for show [5]. - Following the report's release, Ramaco's stock price fell by $3.81, or 9.6%, closing at $36.01 per share on October 23, 2025, amid unusually high trading volume [5].

BHP moves to hide even its own evidence in its defence against coal miner Simon Turner. Michael West with the latest bizarre twist in the David v Goliath court battle.Mining giant BHP Group Limited has sought to withhold sections of the transcript of a Federal Court hearing in a case brought by a former coal miner who broke his back at one of its mine sites and is now pursuing compensation.The application relates to proceedings brought by Simon Turner, a self-represented litigant who appeared in the Federal ...

Core Insights - The company reported solid operational results for the first half of the 2026 financial year, with a focus on improving safety performance [2] Operational Performance - Group run-of-mine coal production reached 4.1 million tonnes, reflecting a 5% increase compared to the previous quarter, driven by strong mining performance [3] - Saleable coal production was recorded at 2.8 million tonnes, which is 3% higher than the previous quarter [3] Safety Performance - There was a deterioration in safety performance, with the 12-month moving average Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR) increasing from 2.61 to 3.8 [2] - The company emphasizes that the safety of its personnel remains the highest priority and is taking focused actions to reverse the negative trend in safety performance [2]

Core Viewpoint - The legal battle between coal miner Simon Turner and BHP highlights significant disparities in resources, with Turner lacking legal representation and facing challenges in accessing court documents related to his wage theft allegations against BHP, which involve claims of over $2 billion in wage theft. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Simon Turner is engaged in a court case against BHP, which has accused him of making "wild allegations" without specifying what those allegations are [1][4]. - The court proceedings have been heavily influenced by BHP's successful confidentiality orders, which suppress Turner's evidence [2]. - Turner faces financial barriers in accessing public court transcripts, which cost $1,952.53, making it difficult for him to obtain information about his own case [3][10]. Group 2: Allegations and Accusations - BHP's legal representatives, Minter Ellison, have claimed that Turner's allegations are "wild," but have not disclosed the specifics of these claims [5][6]. - There is a historical context where BHP and Chandler Macleod previously identified Ready Work Force as Turner's employer, but they have since shifted their stance, arguing that the enforceability of a deed is more important than the identity of the employer [13][15]. - A previous court ruling in 2017 established that Chandler Macleod was Turner's employer, contradicting BHP's current claims [14]. Group 3: Financial Implications - The costs associated with accessing court documents are seen as prohibitive not only for Turner but also for journalists and the public, raising concerns about transparency in the legal process [3][12]. - VIQ Solutions Australia, a foreign venture capital company, stands to profit from the fees charged for accessing public court information, highlighting potential issues within the justice system [11].

Core Points - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Ramaco Resources, Inc. securities between July 31, 2025, and October 23, 2025, of the March 31, 2026, deadline to become a lead plaintiff in a class action lawsuit [1] - Investors may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting Rosen Law Firm [3] Case Details - The lawsuit alleges that during the Class Period, Ramaco made materially false and misleading statements regarding its mining activities at the Brook Mine, claiming that significant mining activities had not commenced and that no active work was taking place [5] - As a result of these misstatements, Ramaco is accused of overstating its development progress, leading to misleading positive statements about its business and operations [5] - The lawsuit claims that when the true details were revealed, investors suffered damages [5] Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and being ranked No. 1 for the number of settlements in 2017 [4] - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4] - Founding partner Laurence Rosen was recognized as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 in 2020, and many attorneys at the firm have received accolades from Lawdragon and Super Lawyers [4]