Workflow
二手汽车交易
icon
Search documents
商务部:2024至2025年全国报废汽车回收1767.3万辆 年均增速45.8%
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the projected growth in the automotive and recycling sectors in China for 2024 to 2025, with significant increases in the number of scrapped vehicles and second-hand car transactions [1] Group 2 - The total number of scrapped vehicles is expected to reach 17.673 million, with an annual growth rate of 45.8% [1] - The second-hand car transactions are projected to be 39.686 million [1] - The recycling of old household appliances and mobile phones is estimated at approximately 53 million units, with an annual growth rate of about 12% [1]
买来的二手电动汽车不带电池,法院认定构成重大误解判决撤销合同
Xin Jing Bao· 2025-08-12 12:55
Core Points - The court ruled to annul the second-hand car sales contract due to a significant misunderstanding regarding the vehicle's battery status [1][2][3] - The buyer, Mr. Yao, purchased an electric vehicle for 178,200 yuan but discovered it did not include a battery, which was a rental option requiring an additional monthly fee [1][2] - The seller, Ms. Wang, claimed she informed the platform about the battery's rental status, but this information was not displayed on the transaction platform [2][3] Summary by Sections - **Contractual Misunderstanding** - The court found that Mr. Yao was misled about the vehicle's battery inclusion, which is a critical component affecting the car's performance and safety [2] - The platform failed to disclose the rental battery information, leading to Mr. Yao's misunderstanding and subsequent contract annulment [2][3] - **Seller's Disclosure Obligations** - Ms. Wang had informed the platform about the battery's rental status, fulfilling her disclosure obligations [2] - The platform's negligence in presenting this information resulted in liability for the contract's annulment [2][3] - **Legal Framework** - The ruling was based on Article 147 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China, which allows for the annulment of contracts based on significant misunderstandings [3] - The court emphasized that only substantial misunderstandings affecting the contract's foundation warrant legal significance [3]