Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the status of Chinese cities as international metropolises, emphasizing the importance of data from authoritative sources to assess their global competitiveness and influence [1][3]. Group 1: Global City Rankings - The 2024 Kearney Global Cities Index ranks Beijing, Shanghai, and Hong Kong in the top ten globally, while Hangzhou and Chengdu are in the top fifty, indicating a strong presence of Chinese cities in international rankings [3][5]. - The GaWC classification identifies six Alpha-level cities in China, including Hong Kong, Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, and Taipei, but highlights that none are in the top tier (Alpha++) alongside cities like London and New York [5][8]. Group 2: Financial and Comprehensive Strength - The 2024 Global Financial Centers Index ranks Shanghai fifth globally, marking a historical high, but still trails behind London, New York, Singapore, and Dubai, indicating a gap in financial competitiveness [7][8]. - The 2025 GYBrand report lists 14 Chinese cities in the top 100 most valuable cities, with only a few like Shanghai, Beijing, and Hong Kong ranking prominently, suggesting a disparity in comprehensive strength among cities [7][8]. Group 3: Identifying International Metropolises - The article identifies eight cities as true international metropolises: Beijing, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Hangzhou, Chengdu, Wuhan, and Suzhou, based on their global recognition and influence [8][10]. - The first tier includes Beijing, Shanghai, Hong Kong, and Shenzhen, which consistently rank high in various international assessments, while the second tier comprises cities like Hangzhou and Chengdu, which show significant upward momentum [8][9]. Group 4: Reasons for Disparities - Four key reasons for the disparities in international status among Chinese cities are identified: the concentration of international enterprises, the ability to attract global talent, the status as international transportation hubs, and the level of political influence [11][12]. - The article emphasizes that becoming an international metropolis requires long-term strategic development rather than short-term efforts, highlighting the need for substantial international engagement and recognition [12][13].