Group 1 - The Natural Resources Department's Second Topographic Survey Team is conducting a comprehensive risk data update for natural disaster prevention in Shaanxi Province, involving multiple industries and covering 23 core data categories across 107 counties [1][2] - The data update includes major disaster-causing data, disaster-bearing body data, comprehensive disaster reduction resources, key hazard data, historical disaster data, assessment and zoning product data, and basic base maps [1] - A "three-level linkage" mechanism is being implemented to promote the work, with technical standards established and training organized for local counties to ensure data quality through a "dual-check" system [1][2] Group 2 - The Second Topographic Survey Team is utilizing software-assisted quality inspection to build a robust data quality control system, ensuring high-quality data collection, updating, and storage [2] - Strict data security management responsibilities are being enforced, including the establishment of confidentiality management systems and training to prevent data leaks [2] - The team emphasizes the principles of "quality first, safety paramount, and application-based" to provide solid data support for building a comprehensive disaster prevention system in Shaanxi Province [2]

Core Viewpoint - Shenzhen has transformed its governance approach from administrative concepts to actionable and traceable practices in disaster prevention and mitigation, establishing a robust legal framework for public safety [1][2][3] Group 1: Legal Framework and Governance - Shenzhen has issued the first comprehensive regulatory fine for natural disasters in the country, penalizing two tourists with fines of 5,000 yuan each for entering hazardous areas during a blue alert for Typhoon "Wipha" [1] - The shift in governance from moral self-discipline and administrative persuasion to legal constraints marks a significant change, clarifying the boundaries of permissible and impermissible actions [2] - The legal authority enhances public awareness of the responsibility-sharing relationship, moving from the perception of "government safety net" to "shared responsibility" [2] Group 2: Comprehensive Management Mechanism - Shenzhen has established a comprehensive management mechanism encompassing "warning issuance—risk control—responsibility accountability," transitioning from formal legal frameworks to substantive effectiveness [3] - The inclusion of "potential risk behaviors" into regulatory oversight breaks the traditional judicial inertia of "no harm, no accountability" [3] - The dual accountability system of "fines + rescue cost recovery" addresses the imbalance of responsibility where personal risks are socialized, while tiered penalties based on warning levels and rescue efforts reflect a refined governance approach [3]