Group 1 - The Natural Resources Department's Second Topographic Survey Team is conducting a comprehensive risk data update for natural disaster prevention in Shaanxi Province, involving multiple industries and covering 23 core data categories across 107 counties [1][2] - The data update includes major disaster-causing data, disaster-bearing body data, comprehensive disaster reduction resources, key hazard data, historical disaster data, assessment and zoning product data, and basic base maps [1] - A "three-level linkage" mechanism is being implemented to promote the work, with technical standards established and training organized for local counties to ensure data quality through a "dual-check" system [1][2] Group 2 - The Second Topographic Survey Team is utilizing software-assisted quality inspection to build a robust data quality control system, ensuring high-quality data collection, updating, and storage [2] - Strict data security management responsibilities are being enforced, including the establishment of confidentiality management systems and training to prevent data leaks [2] - The team emphasizes the principles of "quality first, safety paramount, and application-based" to provide solid data support for building a comprehensive disaster prevention system in Shaanxi Province [2]

深圳通过完善制度供给、健全防灾减灾法律体系，把"源头治理"从行政理念转变为可操作、可追溯的治 理实践，为公共安全构筑起坚实的法治屏障。 更为关键的是，这种治理模式的转型并非简单化的"一刀切"，法治建设更非出台单一法规就万事大吉， 而是需要配套协同的制度体系。从本次事件可见，围绕灾害防控实际，深圳已构建起"预警发布—风险 管控—责任追究"的全过程管理机制，实现了法治建设从"形式完善"到"实质效能"的跨越。在此过程 中，将"潜在风险行为"纳入监管范畴，打破了传统"无损害不追责"的司法惯性；"罚款+救援成本追 偿"的双重问责制度，破解了"个人冒险、社会买单"的权责失衡困境；结合预警级别、救援投入等因素 实施梯度处罚，则体现了精细化治理智慧。这种管理方式既守住了法律底线，又彰显了执法温度，是一 个可供借鉴的治理范例。 （文章来源：经济日报） 近年来，随着户外探险兴起，各类违规探险、盲目冒险等行为屡见不鲜，由此引发的户外事故也频频发 生。此类行为是将个人的冒险行为置于自身及公众安全之上，也反映出对"救援免费"的错误认识和对公 共救援资源的不合理占用。 此次处罚举措清晰地表明，针对这类违规行为，治理方式已经发生了重大转变 ...