《减税与就业法案》

Search documents
“大而美”法案,真的美吗?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-07-11 23:05
Core Viewpoint - The "Big and Beautiful" bill signed by President Trump is a significant piece of legislation that could alter the economic landscape of the United States for the next decade, raising questions about whether it will lead to greatness or decline [1] Tax Cuts and Welfare Reductions - The bill continues the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, locking corporate tax rates at 21% and increasing various personal tax exemptions, benefiting high-income groups significantly [2] - Research from Yale indicates that the top 1% of earners will receive 45% of the tax cuts, while the bottom 20% will see a 2.3% decrease in after-tax income, highlighting a "robbing the poor to pay the rich" scenario [2] - The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that the bill will increase the federal deficit by $3.4 trillion over the next decade, despite claims that economic growth will offset this deficit [2] Impact on Social Welfare - The bill proposes significant cuts to social welfare programs, potentially resulting in 12 million people losing health insurance and 40 million facing reductions in food assistance, affecting vulnerable populations including children, the elderly, and the disabled [3] - The attempt to boost employment through mandatory work requirements for welfare recipients may not address the real issue of skilled labor shortages in the manufacturing sector [3] Federal Reserve's Role - Political pressure on the Federal Reserve, including calls for interest rate cuts and leadership changes, poses risks to the independence of the central bank, which could lead to stagflation [3] - The potential for a new Fed chair to yield to political pressures could undermine the credibility of the dollar [3] Political Implications - The "Big and Beautiful" bill appears to be a product of political maneuvering, with wealthy individuals benefiting at the expense of the poor, leading to increased debt and reduced welfare [4] - The upcoming midterm elections are viewed as a referendum on this bill, which could determine the future political landscape for the Republican Party [4]