他是冰心的丈夫，是费孝通的老师，他率先提出"社会学中国化"的理念，他就是当之无愧的中国社会学 奠基者与领航人吴文藻。然而关于吴文藻，一直都缺乏一部全面而深入的传记。孙飞宇教授所著的《吴 文藻传：从社会学中国化到重建中国社会学》，填补了这一空白。这本书不仅是对吴文藻个人生平的记 录，更是一部中国社会学早期发展的生动历史。 1916年，15岁的吴文藻踏入清华学堂，开始了他的学术之路。7年后，吴文藻远渡重洋，进入美国达特 茅斯学院社会学系深造，后又转入哥伦比亚大学研究生院，跨界研习人类学。在这里，吴文藻旁听了人 类学泰斗博厄斯的课程。博厄斯的文化相对主义观点，以及对田野调查的极致推崇，让年轻的吴文藻开 始思考如何将人类学的研究方法和视角引入社会学，又该如何让社会学适配不同文明的土壤。1928年， 吴文藻以优异成绩取得博士学位，此时的他，已在国际学术界崭露头角，而他心中"让社会学落地中 国"的信念也愈发坚定。 学成归国的吴文藻入职燕京大学。那时中国社会学界的处境相当尴尬，课堂上多是外文授课，案例也多 取自西方，这种舶来品难以回应中国社会的真实问题。面对这种情况，吴文藻率先喊出"社会学中国 化"的口号。他从教学改革率先 ...

Group 1 - The core argument of the article revolves around the systemic unfairness in the modern American labor market, particularly focusing on low wages and the factors influencing wage determination [5][6][9] - The author critiques traditional economic theories that link wages directly to risk or productivity, arguing that this assumption does not hold true in practice [6][9] - The book discusses how employers maintain low wages through policies like salary secrecy and non-compete agreements, which limit employees' bargaining power [6][9] Group 2 - The author identifies key factors in wage determination, including power dynamics, inertia, imitation, and fairness, which challenge mainstream human capital and job theories [6][9] - The analysis highlights the role of weakened unions and the shareholder primacy ideology in contributing to wage stagnation and widening income inequality in the U.S. [6][9] - The book suggests that the current plight of American workers is not coincidental but rather a result of carefully designed systemic forces [8][9] Group 3 - The author proposes comprehensive reform ideas aimed at raising minimum wages, expanding the middle class, and limiting elite incomes, which face significant political resistance in a weakened union environment [9] - The discussion includes the importance of understanding organizational performance metrics and the underlying power intentions rather than blindly accepting them [7][9] - The book emphasizes the need for workers to critically assess the performance indicators set by organizations to recognize the power dynamics at play [9]