关注 「电动车公社」 和我们一起重新思考汽车 2024财年，丰田汽车虽然保住了销量第一的桂冠，但 4.8万亿日元（约2320亿元人民币）的 综合营业利润，已经下滑10%。 据丰田内部估计，到了2025财年，净利润甚至有可能暴跌34.9%，只剩3.1万亿日元…… 一般来说，遭遇这种情况，高管不被降薪就不错了。 然而，身为丰 田汽车董事长的丰田章男，却一反常态地拿到了19.49亿日元（约9425万元人民币）的高薪， 涨幅超过20%！ 而这，甚至不是他第一次逆势涨薪了。 早在2023财年，丰田子公司被曝 在64款车型上 伪造安全数据，让监管不力的丰田卷入了造假丑闻。 真正有价值的财富，早已被深度绑定在三井等 各大财阀股东当中。 但没想到，丰田章男居然以 16.22亿日元的年薪， 创下了丰田历代董事长的最高薪酬！62%的超高涨幅， 也引发了一系列争议。 那么，丰田章男到底凭什么，能以 97%的支持率连任董事长之位？这位70多岁的老头子，又能给丰田带来什么价值？ 今天，我们就来好好聊一聊。 01. 财富来自权力，权力并非天授 众所周知，丰田章男作为创始人丰田喜一郎的孙子，在受中国传统文化影响颇深的日本，可以说是携家族荣 ...

7月25日，中央部门集中向社会公开了2024年度决算，这是中央部门决算连续第15年公开。收入决算、 支出决算、财政拨款"三公"经费支出决算……各中央部门的"账本"展示出9张部门决算公开表以及部门 决算说明等内容，充分反映年度收支情况，接受社会公众监督。 透过中央部门"账本"，"三公"经费、政府采购等社会关注的热点问题也能从中找到答案。 各中央部门均公布了"财政拨款'三公'经费支出决算表"，并在"决算说明"中进行具体详细的说明，特别 是对"三公"经费支出与全年预算数和上年决算数对比情况进行解释。 绩效评价是全过程预算绩效管理的关键环节，也是对全年预算执行效果的检验。财政部有关负责人介 绍，2016年以来，在全面开展项目支出绩效自评的基础上，财政部组织中央部门逐步建立健全重大政策 和重点项目支出绩效评价常态化机制，不断拓展绩效评价范围，逐步提升绩效评价质量，加强评价结果 应用。 绩效评价包括单位自评、部门评价和财政评价。近年来，财政部组织中央部门对本级项目全面开展绩效 自评，并加大自评结果抽查复核力度，推动提升自评结果的客观性和真实性。 同时，财政部持续推动改进部门评价工作，督促部门加大对重点民生支出和体现核心职 ...

金融界2025年7月25日消息，国家知识产权局信息显示，中国石油化工股份有限公司;中石化安全工程研 究院有限公司;中石化管理体系认证（青岛）有限公司申请一项名为"一种基于蒙特卡罗方法的企业风险 隐患管理绩效评价方法及系统"的专利，公开号CN120373831A，申请日期为2024年01月。 专利摘要显示，本发明公开了一种基于蒙特卡罗方法的企业风险隐患管理绩效评价方法及系统，该方法 步骤为：采用德尔菲法确定并构建企业风险隐患管理绩效评价指标体系，该体系共包括企业风险值分 析、风险评估完成率、风险控制水平、隐患管理四个一级指标；对指标体系内每个指标进行采集、获取 和计算；计算企业风险隐患管理绩效评价结果，并进行评价分级。本发明构建了更加科学合理的用于表 征企业风险隐患管理绩效的指标体系，建立了三角模糊数耦合蒙特卡罗的企业风险隐患管理绩效评价模 型，既得到了企业风险隐患管理绩效评价值，同时也获取了企业绩效评价范围值，既实现了企业风险隐 患管理绩效水平的量化评价，又在一定程度上体现出企业风险隐患管理的不确定性。 天眼查资料显示，中国石油化工股份有限公司，成立于2000年，位于北京市，是一家以从事石油和天然 气开采业为 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the transformation of urban development in China from scale expansion to quality enhancement, guided by the "People's City" concept, which prioritizes the needs and aspirations of the people in urban renewal efforts [1][2]. Urban Renewal Value Orientation - The "People's City" concept redefines urban renewal as a comprehensive transformation that includes spatial restructuring, social governance innovation, and economic dynamism conversion, aiming for sustainable urban development [2]. - Urban renewal should focus on enhancing the happiness and well-being of residents, addressing the diverse needs of different demographic groups, including youth, new citizens, and the elderly [2][3]. Addressing Demographic Needs - The aging population necessitates the inclusion of facilities like nursing homes and activity centers in urban renewal projects, promoting an elderly-friendly environment [3]. - Low-income groups must be protected during urban renewal, ensuring access to affordable housing and essential services to prevent social exclusion [3]. Coordinated Urban Renewal Approach - A coordinated approach to urban renewal is essential to address issues of spatial fragmentation and functional imbalance, advocating for gradual, organic updates that preserve cultural heritage while meeting residents' needs [3]. Performance Evaluation Framework - A scientific performance evaluation system for urban renewal is crucial, focusing on comprehensive, measurable, comparable, and dynamic principles across spatial, economic, and social dimensions [4][5]. - The evaluation should encompass both quantitative and qualitative metrics, ensuring a holistic assessment of urban renewal outcomes [5][6]. Technological Integration and Multi-Stakeholder Participation - The integration of advanced technologies like big data and AI is vital for enhancing the accuracy and effectiveness of urban renewal evaluations, alongside the involvement of diverse stakeholders such as businesses, social organizations, and residents [7][8]. - A collaborative evaluation framework that includes input from various stakeholders will ensure a comprehensive and objective assessment of urban renewal initiatives [8].

Core Points - The Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development have organized experts to evaluate the performance of the central financial support for urban renewal actions in 2024 [1] - The evaluation results will be classified into four levels: A, B, C, and D, which will influence the allocation of subsidy funds [1] - Cities with an A rating will receive priority support, while those rated C and D may face funding reductions [1] Group 1 - The performance evaluation aims to enhance the effectiveness of central financial subsidies for urban renewal [1] - The evaluation results will serve as a key basis for the allocation of subsidy funds [1] - Cities achieving an A rating will be recognized and may receive expedited funding [1] Group 2 - Four cities received an A rating: Chongqing, Chengdu (Sichuan), Nanjing (Jiangsu), and Xi'an (Shaanxi) [2][3] - Ten cities received a B rating: Hangzhou (Zhejiang), Shenyang (Liaoning), Nanchang (Jiangxi), Taiyuan (Shanxi), Shanghai, Fuzhou (Fujian), Hefei (Anhui), Dongguan (Guangdong), Shijiazhuang (Hebei), and Wuhan (Hubei) [4] - One city received a C rating: Qingdao (Shandong) [5][6]

Group 1: Government Initiatives - The meeting emphasized the importance of continuous improvement in the Party's work style and the implementation of the Central Eight Regulations to ensure political and action clarity [1][4] - The government aims to enhance the quality of preschool education by scientifically planning resources and improving the quality of kindergartens, teacher qualifications, and funding [2][4] - Fire safety is highlighted as crucial for public safety and economic stability, with a focus on increasing inspections and improving infrastructure to enhance fire prevention capabilities [5][6] Group 2: State-Owned Enterprises - Performance evaluation of state-owned enterprises is identified as a key strategy for enhancing quality and efficiency, with a focus on adapting to market changes and fostering new profit growth points [3][6] - The government encourages the efficient use of idle assets to create new development momentum and aims to reduce management costs while optimizing compensation and performance systems [6]

Core Viewpoint - The Jiangsu Provincial People's Congress is reviewing the performance of the fiscal science and technology special funds for 2024, highlighting both progress and areas needing improvement in funding allocation and effectiveness [1][2]. Funding Allocation and Performance - Jiangsu's fiscal science and technology special funds have seen increased investment, with a notable rise in basic research funding from 3.077 billion yuan in 2022 to 6.724 billion yuan in 2024, marking a doubling in short-term investment [2][3]. - The basic research funding proportion in Jiangsu is 4.94%, significantly lower than Shanghai's 10.56%, despite similar total R&D expenditures [2]. Evaluation and Management - The provincial government is developing a performance evaluation system for laboratories, focusing on macro, meso, and micro indicators to assess the effectiveness of funding and research outcomes [3]. - A comprehensive performance management system is being implemented to address issues such as slow project progress and improper fund usage, with a focus on contract management and monitoring of project milestones [4][5]. Audit Findings and Rectification - Recent audits have identified 23 areas for improvement in the management and use of science and technology special funds, leading to the establishment of a task list for rectification [7][8]. - All identified issues have been addressed as of June 30, 2023, resulting in optimized funding allocation and improved project management processes [8].

本期导读： 制定基金绩效评价制度、构建符合国资基金特点的绩效评价指标体系，对于实现基金的业绩目标、 政策效益，保障基金良性运营有较为重大的意义。 目前在杉域负责咨询业务，包括基金投前可行性研究，商业尽调，GP图谱，基金绩效评价，专题 培训、基金/项目退出等方案设计。 本期推荐阅读5分钟 近几年，国资LP已经成为了私募股权基金的出资主力，存量基金加上增量基金，规模可以说是十 分庞大。 但大多数国资LP对已投的子基金尚未建立完善的绩效评价体系， 即便实行了，由于团队 的从业年限及对私募股权行业的理解程度，实践经验，制定的相关评价指标比较笼统， 并未实现 绩效评价工作应有的客观分析及激励和监管作用。 在实践中，由于评价指标不清晰或者缺失以及 投资数据不完备、子基金配合程度不够、资料真实性需要验证等因素，导致评价工作无法取得预期 的效果。 作者丨 杉域资本董事总经理 王春杰 | 利益相关方 | 利益诉求 | | --- | --- | | 国资 | 产业 招引、产 业结构调整及升级、挖掘优质项目、保值增值、政策及 社会效益、区域上下游配套产业协同创新和发展、跟投、让利退出等 | | 社会资本 | 投资收益、资源生态、 ...

该州科学设置指标体系，夯实绩效评价基础。对标省、州两级绩效评价政策文件，立足项目属性、目标 及行业规范，系统梳理项目全周期关键节点与预期成效，科学合理设置涵盖评价指标、指标权重(标准 分值)、指标解释、评价标准、评价分值等内容的评价指标体系，为绩效评价提供精准标尺。 海北州坚持独立性原则，全程把控评价质量。在被评价单位或项目实施单位提供绩效评价信息的基础 上，通过查阅资料、实地调查、现场问询等方式加强信息核实与取证，对不同渠道获取的信息进行交叉 印证，确保数据真实可靠。严格遵循格式规范严谨、内容完整详实、表述精准无误、重点突出鲜明四项 标准撰写评价报告，客观反映项目存在的问题，提出切实可行的建议，提升评价成果的应用价值。(完) 中新网青海新闻4月30日电(刘东 李隽)近年来，海北州积极贯彻落实《青海省预算绩效管理条例》，从 明确评价目标、设置指标体系以及把控评价质量这三个关键维度精准发力，全方位、深层次推动绩效评 价工作提质增效。 海北州明确绩效评价目标，深度剖析相关政策。在绩效评价前期准备阶段，梳理项目相关资料，从项目 业务管理、财务管理、产出、效益等方面，提炼出可衡量、可考核的绩效目标，明确项目绩效评价目 ...

本期导读： 制定基金绩效评价制度、构建符合国资基金特点的绩效评价指标体系，对于实现基金的业绩目标、 政策效益，保障基金良性运营有较为重大的意义。 本期推荐阅读5分钟 近几年，国资LP已经成为了私募股权基金的出资主力，存量基金加上增量基金，规模可以说是十 分庞大。 但大多数国资LP对已投的子基金尚未建立完善的绩效评价体系， 即便实行了，由于团队 的从业年限及对私募股权行业的理解程度，实践经验，制定的相关评价指标比较笼统， 并未实现 绩效评价工作应有的客观分析及激励和监管作用。 在实践中，由于评价指标不清晰或者缺失以及 投资数据不完备、子基金配合程度不够、资料真实性需要验证等因素，导致评价工作无法取得预期 的效果。 事实上，制定基金绩效评价制度、构建符合国资基金特点的绩效评价指标体系，对于实现基金的业 绩目标、政策效益，保障基金良性运营有较为重大的意义， 主要体现在 ： 1、 对子基金的目标实现程度、投资运营情况等开展评价，能够及时发现运作问题并加以修正，确 保子基金不偏离既定方向。 2、 可营造公平公开的营运环境，提高国资LP的资源配置效率。 3、 通过绩效评价，可判断出子基金目标的合理性、基金管理团队的专业能 ...