Group 1 - The article discusses the "boy crisis" in education, highlighting the declining number of boys in higher education and the increasing concerns among parents [1][2] - Data shows that in 2024, only 37% of national college entrance exam candidates are boys, with a significant drop from 116.1 boys per 100 girls in elementary school to 58.7 boys per 100 girls in undergraduate studies [2] - Mental health statistics indicate that boys have a higher prevalence of mental disorders compared to girls, which may be linked to societal expectations of masculinity that discourage emotional expression [3] Group 2 - The article emphasizes the societal biases and stereotypes in the upbringing of boys, where traditional gender roles dictate their behavior and interests [8][9] - It points out that boys are often encouraged to exhibit traits associated with masculinity, while girls are expected to embody femininity, leading to a disparity in emotional development and social skills [9][11] - The author references a global study indicating that these gender biases can have lifelong negative impacts on both boys and girls, affecting their mental health and social interactions [19] Group 3 - The article critiques the rigid gender norms that restrict boys from exploring interests traditionally associated with girls, such as playing with dolls or wearing certain colors [7][28] - It discusses the consequences of these norms, including the potential for boys to resort to violence as a means of asserting their masculinity, and the emotional struggles they face when unable to express vulnerability [32][40] - The author calls for a reevaluation of how boys are raised, advocating for an approach that allows them to express a full range of emotions and interests without the constraints of gender stereotypes [47][56] Group 4 - The article highlights the need for parents and educators to foster an environment where boys can develop empathy and emotional intelligence, rather than adhering to outdated notions of masculinity [48][51] - It suggests that boys should be taught to resolve conflicts through communication and understanding rather than aggression, challenging the notion that physical strength equates to masculinity [53][54] - The author encourages the inclusion of diverse male role models in various fields to broaden boys' understanding of masculinity beyond traditional stereotypes [56][59]

Core Viewpoint - The mini-series "Chaos in Adolescence" explores the tragic story of a 13-year-old boy who kills a female classmate, sparking global discussions about toxic masculinity and the societal factors contributing to youth violence [1][4][10]. Group 1: Toxic Masculinity and Youth Violence - The series attributes the tragedy to toxic masculinity, which pressures boys to suppress emotions and define their worth through control and dominance, ultimately harming both men and women [4][8]. - A significant factor in the boy's violent behavior is the internalization of toxic masculinity, which is exacerbated by societal expectations and peer interactions [5][6]. - The portrayal of the boy's relationship with his father highlights the impact of traditional male roles, where emotional neglect leads to feelings of shame and anger [6][7][21]. Group 2: Social Media Influence - Social media amplifies toxic masculinity, with platforms like TikTok promoting misogynistic content that fosters hostility towards women among young males [12][14]. - The conflict between the boy and the victim reflects typical social media interactions, where labeling and name-calling replace meaningful dialogue [13][14]. - The series suggests that social media serves as a magnifying glass for existing societal issues, intensifying feelings of anger and humiliation among youth [14][10]. Group 3: Educational and Familial Context - The educational system struggles to address the challenges posed by the internet, with many schools lacking the resources to effectively monitor students' online behavior [19][20]. - Parents often remain unaware of their children's online activities, leading to a disconnect that exacerbates the issues faced by adolescents [21][22]. - The series emphasizes the need for a more robust support system in both schools and families to prevent such tragedies from occurring [24][39]. Group 4: Rethinking Masculinity - The narrative raises questions about how boys are raised in contemporary society, highlighting the need for updated educational approaches that address male identity and emotional health [35][36]. - The series suggests that traditional views of masculinity must be challenged to foster empathy, emotional intelligence, and healthier relationships among boys [37][38]. - Ultimately, the series calls for a collective effort to redefine masculinity and create a more supportive environment for young males [39].