Core Viewpoint - The temporary shareholders' meeting of AVIC Chengfei (302132.SZ) on September 12 did not pass the proposal to amend the "Investment Management System" due to a significant number of abstentions, primarily from the largest shareholder, AVIC Group [1][4]. Group 1: Shareholder Meeting Outcomes - The meeting reviewed a total of 10 proposals, including the amendment of the "Fundraising Management System" [1]. - The proposal regarding the amendment of the "Investment Management System" was not passed due to abstentions from approximately 2.1 billion shares, which corresponds to the holdings of AVIC Group [3][4]. - The voting results showed that only about 2.97 million shares (12.36%) supported the proposal, while 948,400 shares (0.04%) opposed it, and 2.1 billion shares (87.60%) were abstained [4]. Group 2: Changes in Investment Management System - The new "Investment Management System" shifts from "person authorization" to "matter approval," decentralizing investment rights to the board of directors, shareholders' meeting, and the general manager's office [3][6]. - The previous system allowed the chairman to make decisions on investments below 10% of the company's audited net assets, while the new system establishes clear approval thresholds based on transaction scale and impact [6][7]. - The new system emphasizes collective decision-making, removing individual authorization for the chairman and instead requiring decisions to be made collectively by the relevant decision-making bodies [6][7].

Core Viewpoint - The recent temporary shareholders' meeting of AVIC Chengfei (302132.SZ) revealed significant shareholder dynamics, particularly regarding the failure to pass the revised investment management system due to a high number of abstentions, primarily from the largest shareholder, AVIC Group [1][2][4]. Group 1: Shareholder Voting Dynamics - The proposal to amend the investment management system was not approved due to approximately 2.1 billion shares abstaining from voting, which corresponds to the shares held by AVIC Group, the largest shareholder [1][3]. - The voting results showed that only about 12.36% of the attending shareholders supported the proposal, while 87.60% abstained, indicating a lack of consensus among shareholders [1][2]. - In contrast, minority shareholders exhibited a different voting trend, with 58.34% in favor, 37.74% against, and only 3.92% abstaining [2]. Group 2: Changes in Investment Management System - The revised investment management system shifted from a "person authorization" model to a "matter approval" model, decentralizing investment decision-making authority to the board of directors, shareholders' meeting, and the general manager's office [1][5][6]. - The previous system allowed the chairman to make decisions on investments below 10% of the company's audited net assets, while the new system emphasizes collective decision-making without individual authorization for the chairman [5][6]. - The new system establishes clear thresholds for investment activities, requiring different levels of approval based on the scale and impact of the transactions [6].