Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the public fallout between Zhao Lusi and her management company, Galaxy Cool Entertainment, which has led to significant media attention and potential financial repercussions for both parties [1][4][21] - Zhao Lusi's actions, including publicly criticizing her agency and revealing personal struggles, have raised concerns about her marketability and the company's stability, as she is a major revenue driver for Galaxy Cool [4][12][21] - The company has faced challenges in maintaining its talent and adapting to the evolving entertainment landscape, with previous capital withdrawals and management changes exacerbating its difficulties [10][22][25] Group 2 - Galaxy Cool Entertainment, founded in 2015, has a strong background in variety shows, achieving significant success with programs like "Mars Intelligence Agency," which garnered 3.4 billion views across its first three seasons [5][6] - The company has struggled financially in recent years, reporting losses in 2018 and 2019, and has shifted its focus to film and television production, which has not yielded the expected results [6][10] - The management structure and profit-sharing model within Galaxy Cool have been criticized, particularly regarding the high commission rates charged to artists like Zhao Lusi, which have led to disputes and dissatisfaction [8][9][22] Group 3 - The entertainment industry is witnessing a shift in audience preferences, with newer talent gaining popularity and creating a more competitive environment for established stars like Zhao Lusi [14][25] - The ongoing conflict highlights broader issues within the industry, such as the pressures faced by artists, the lack of sustainable management practices, and the potential for public disputes to damage reputations [22][25] - The situation underscores the need for better alignment between talent and management, emphasizing the importance of mutual benefit and long-term planning in artist-agency relationships [21][25]

Core Viewpoint - The conflict between Zhao Lusi and her agency, Galaxy Cool Entertainment, has escalated, with Zhao accusing the agency of financial misconduct and neglecting her mental health during her treatment for severe anxiety and depression [1][4][5]. Group 1: Zhao Lusi's Allegations - Zhao Lusi claims that Galaxy Cool Entertainment deducted 2.05 million yuan from her studio account for canceled endorsements, despite the agency's prior commitment to cover these losses [1][6]. - She has expressed frustration over the agency's failure to resolve issues related to her work and the lack of support from her team during her health struggles [1][6]. - Zhao has indicated that she will escalate the matter to the police if a resolution is not reached [1]. Group 2: Galaxy Cool Entertainment's Response - Galaxy Cool Entertainment responded by stating they were shocked by Zhao's allegations and denied any wrongdoing, emphasizing their concern for her health and well-being [4][5]. - The agency highlighted that they have been under significant pressure and have made efforts to minimize negative impacts while respecting Zhao's reasonable requests [4][5]. - They urged Zhao to refrain from making vague public statements that could mislead the public [4]. Group 3: Legal and Operational Implications - Legal experts suggest that if Galaxy Cool Entertainment claims the deduction was for endorsement losses, they must prove a direct causal relationship between Zhao's actions and the financial losses incurred [6]. - The operational dynamics between Zhao and the agency are under scrutiny, particularly regarding the management of her studio and the distribution of staff responsibilities [7]. - The ongoing conflict reflects deeper issues within the entertainment industry regarding artist management and agency relationships, especially as artists gain more leverage in negotiations [14][16]. Group 4: Historical Context and Industry Dynamics - The relationship between Zhao Lusi and Galaxy Cool Entertainment has been strained for some time, with Zhao previously disclosing her struggles with depression linked to past incidents with the agency [9][10]. - Galaxy Cool Entertainment has historically relied on Zhao as a key asset, particularly in their transition to focusing on talent management amid changing market conditions [10][11]. - The agency's connection to larger entities like Alibaba has been noted, but the depth of this relationship is questioned, especially after recent changes in ownership and partnerships [11][12].