Core Viewpoint - The stability of information systems in the securities industry is essential for ensuring the safe operation of financial markets, prompting the China Securities Association to seek industry feedback on the "Stability Assurance System Standard for the Securities Industry" [1][2]. Group 1: Background and Purpose - The initiative aims to integrate best practices from securities firms to create a practical stability assurance framework, promoting the digital and standardized development of technical capabilities across the industry [1]. - The project for drafting the standard began in November 2023, with participation from 14 securities firms, including major players like GF Securities and CITIC Securities [1]. Group 2: Current Challenges - There are four main challenges identified: 1. Lack of resilience design in system development, leading to high operational risk prevention costs due to insufficient monitoring and automation capabilities [2]. 2. Predominantly reactive risk perception during operations, lacking proactive data-driven risk identification capabilities [2]. 3. Emergency response relies heavily on individual expert experience, lacking data-driven human-machine collaborative capabilities [2]. 4. Insufficient depth of intelligent technology application, resulting in a gap between abnormal response efficiency and real-time business requirements [2]. Group 3: Proposed Framework - The "Stability Assurance System Standard" proposes a "three-in-one" framework for stability assurance, focusing on organizational, institutional, and process guarantees [3]. - Organizational guarantees include defining the structure, personnel competency requirements, and management objectives [3]. - Institutional guarantees encompass regulations, technical support, operational procedures, and timelines to ensure management requirements are actionable and traceable [3]. - Process guarantees focus on ten core processes related to stability management, including monitoring, alerting, and fault management, with mechanisms for evaluation and key activities [3]. - The standard emphasizes a shift towards proactive operations management to meet non-functional requirements like resilience and maintainability, utilizing digital methods to enhance defense capabilities [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the introduction of a new standard for the stability assurance of information systems in the securities industry, aimed at enhancing operational resilience and security [1][2]. Group 1: Standard Overview - The "Securities Industry Information System Stability Assurance System Standard (Draft for Comments)" is being solicited for feedback from the industry by the China Securities Association [1]. - The standard provides a comprehensive framework for building an effective stability assurance system, emphasizing organizational, institutional, and process guarantees [1]. Group 2: Organizational Guarantees - The standard specifies requirements for organizational structure, personnel capabilities, and management of process guarantees [2]. - It proposes a dual-team structure: a vertical team focused on operational depth and a horizontal team dedicated to process optimization and technical support [2]. Group 3: Personnel Capabilities - The standard emphasizes three dimensions: capability assessment, personnel training, and human-machine collaboration [2]. - It encourages firms to establish clear competency models and explore new operational capabilities to adapt to automation and intelligence trends [2]. Group 4: Institutional Guarantees - The institutional aspect is viewed as "hard rules" for building a safety foundation, integrating regulations, technical standards, and operational procedures into a closed-loop system [2]. Group 5: Process Guarantees - The process guarantees focus on ten core processes, including stability architecture management and fault management, with clear mechanisms and evaluation elements [2]. Group 6: Industry Impact - The standard is seen as a significant shift from traditional standards, with nearly 20 industry experts contributing to its development [3]. - It aims to enhance operational resilience and proactive defense capabilities through digital means and measurable stability evaluation factors [3].