Group 1 - The article discusses the significant increase in U.S. national debt, which rose from $27.8 trillion to $36.2 trillion during Biden's presidency, highlighting a $10 trillion increase over four years [4][6][9] - The annual fiscal deficit under the Biden administration is approximately $2 trillion, with the deficit-to-GDP ratio consistently exceeding the average of the past 50 years [6][9] - The total debt of American citizens increased from $14.56 trillion to $18.04 trillion during Biden's term, marking one of the largest debt growths in U.S. history [6][9] Group 2 - Biden's administration implemented several reforms aimed at increasing fiscal revenue, including raising the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28% and enhancing social welfare programs [11][13] - The article compares Biden's approach to that of former President Clinton, who successfully increased government revenue through tax reforms and social investments [11][13] - Trump's first term saw significant tax cuts, reducing the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% and the highest personal income tax rate from 39.6% to 37%, leading to a decrease in government revenue [17][20] Group 3 - The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" was introduced to address the national debt and fiscal challenges, proposing to raise the debt ceiling by $5 trillion [33][36] - The act includes substantial tax cuts, particularly for small businesses and the manufacturing sector, while also eliminating certain tax credits for the renewable energy industry [37][40] - The act is expected to reduce government revenue by approximately $4.46 trillion over the next decade, raising concerns about long-term fiscal sustainability [43][45] Group 4 - The article outlines the potential negative impacts of the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" on vulnerable populations, including cuts to healthcare and food assistance programs, affecting millions of Americans [49][51] - It highlights the increased financial burden on education, with reduced federal support for higher education and increased tax rates on university endowments [53][54] - The act's approach is characterized as benefiting the elite while imposing hardships on lower-income groups, leading to accusations of wealth redistribution from the poor to the rich [56][58]