Group 1 - The core point of the article is that China's recent trade measures against South Korea are not merely retaliatory but rather a well-prepared response to ongoing trade dynamics [1][3][5] - China's Ministry of Commerce announced the continuation of anti-dumping duties on stainless steel products from South Korea, the EU, the UK, and Indonesia, which had been in place since July 2019 [5][9] - The timing of China's announcement, just days after South Korea's tax increase, suggests a strategic maneuver rather than a spontaneous reaction [7][11] Group 2 - South Korean President Lee Jae-myung is navigating a complex situation, balancing pressure from the U.S. and the need to maintain economic ties with China, which is South Korea's largest trading partner [11][13][15] - Lee's administration has shown a willingness to engage in dialogue with China while also responding to U.S. demands, indicating a cautious approach to foreign relations [18][20][22] - The article highlights a shift in the nature of Sino-Korean disputes, moving from aggressive rhetoric to a more rule-based and restrained interaction [24][26][29] Group 3 - The potential for cooperation between China and South Korea in high-tech sectors such as AI, semiconductors, and renewable energy is emphasized, suggesting that both countries can benefit from their respective strengths [33][35][37] - The article concludes that the current trade tensions may lead to a new model of international relations characterized by rationality and restraint, which could serve as a reference for other nations facing similar disputes [39][40]