Core Insights - The article discusses the debate between native code development and low-code development in the context of digital transformation for enterprises, highlighting the pros and cons of each approach [1][3][5] Cost Considerations - Cost is a critical factor for enterprises in digital transformation, with two main approaches to native code development: outsourcing and building an in-house development team. Outsourcing saves labor costs but risks losing control over core technology, while in-house teams offer control but incur higher management costs [2][3] Low-Code Development - Low-code platforms provide a balance between the two approaches, allowing businesses without development teams to quickly build systems at a low cost. However, this advantage diminishes as complexity increases, leading to potential hidden costs that may exceed traditional development expenses [3][5] Technical Limitations - Low-code solutions are not a complete replacement for coding; they have inherent technical barriers. Many traditional enterprises lack the technical expertise to effectively utilize low-code tools, leading to poorly constructed systems that may fail to meet business needs [4][5] Current Application Status - The current application of low-code in enterprises is described as awkward, as it fails to achieve the ideal of "democratized development." Business departments find the functionality lacking, while technical teams criticize its professionalism and flexibility [5][6] Guidelines for Enterprises - Companies should adopt a "five-look" principle when considering low-code applications: 1. Assess the stage of digital transformation 2. Identify suitable application scenarios 3. Evaluate technical capabilities 4. Ensure effective collaboration between technical and business teams 5. Understand the boundaries of low-code technology [6]