Core Viewpoint - The ETF-FOF market is experiencing significant expansion after three years, with 12 institutions filing for 17 ETF-FOF products, driven by a recovering market and increasing popularity of ETFs [1][3][5] Group 1: Market Overview - As of September 5, 2025, there are 17 ETF-FOF products filed by 12 institutions, with 16 expected to be launched within the year [1][3] - The current market for ETFs has surpassed 5 trillion yuan, with over 1,200 products available, providing a diverse range of low-cost and efficient underlying assets for FOFs [7] Group 2: Product Characteristics - ETF-FOF products are defined as public FOFs that allocate over 80% of their non-cash underlying assets to ETFs, marking a shift from traditional active management FOFs [2] - Recent ETF-FOF products include the Xingzheng Global Yingfeng Multi-Asset Allocation and others, with a significant portion of their assets allocated to equity [2][4] Group 3: Industry Trends - The rise of ETF-FOF is attributed to the recovery of market conditions and the growth of the ETF market, which has prompted fund companies to restart their ETF-FOF strategies [5][6] - The first ETF-FOF products were established in 2021, but the expansion was limited until the recent favorable market conditions [5][6] Group 4: Managerial Challenges - The increasing complexity and diversity of ETFs require fund managers to enhance their asset allocation capabilities, focusing on multi-asset strategies rather than just stock selection [8] - Fund managers need strong macroeconomic analysis skills, market insight, and the ability to adapt their strategies to optimize risk-return profiles [8][9]

Core Viewpoint - The public fund industry is increasingly focusing on the role of performance benchmarks in investment constraints, leading to a more detailed approach in setting benchmarks for multi-asset portfolio products [1][6]. Group 1: Performance Benchmark Details - Recent multi-asset products have significantly enhanced the richness of performance benchmarks, incorporating various asset classes such as U.S. stocks, Hong Kong stocks, commodities, and deposits [2][3]. - The performance benchmark for the newly launched Yongying Yuan Ying Stable Multi-Asset 90-Day Holding product consists of six components, including 70% domestic bonds, 10% A-shares, 5% U.S. stocks, 5% Hong Kong stocks, 5% commodities, and 5% deposits [2][3]. Group 2: Investment Strategy and Philosophy - The detailed benchmarks reflect a shift in investment philosophy from a simple stock-bond pairing to a more diversified and global asset allocation system, especially in the current low-interest-rate environment [1][6]. - The trend towards detailed performance benchmarks indicates a recognition within the asset management industry of the need for a more complex and varied approach to asset allocation [6][7]. Group 3: Communication and Transparency - The refined benchmarks serve as a communication bridge between investors and fund managers, clarifying investment strategies, styles, and performance measurement [5][6]. - Clear asset composition enhances product transparency, helping investors understand risk sources and return drivers, thereby establishing reasonable expectations [4][5]. Group 4: Future Implications - The introduction of multi-asset strategies is expected to transform performance benchmarks from passive references to active guides, influencing strategy design, management constraints, and performance attribution [7]. - The industry is moving towards a more systematic and process-oriented approach to multi-asset research and decision-making, reducing reliance on ad-hoc strategies [4][6].

Core Viewpoint - The public fund industry is increasingly focusing on the role of performance benchmarks in investment constraints, leading to a more detailed approach in setting benchmarks for multi-asset portfolio products [1][4]. Group 1: Benchmark Composition - Recent multi-asset products have significantly enhanced the richness of their performance benchmarks, incorporating various asset classes such as U.S. stocks, Hong Kong stocks, commodities, and deposits [1][3]. - The performance benchmark for the newly launched Yongying Yuan Ying Stable Multi-Asset 90-Day Holding product consists of six components, including 70% domestic bonds, 10% A-shares, 5% U.S. stocks, 5% Hong Kong stocks, 5% commodities, and 5% deposits [2][3]. Group 2: Investment Strategy and Transparency - The detailed benchmarks reflect a shift in investment philosophy from simple stock-bond combinations to a more diversified and global asset allocation approach, especially in a low-interest-rate environment [1][6]. - A clear and detailed performance benchmark enhances product transparency, helping investors better understand risk sources and return drivers, thereby establishing reasonable expectations [4][5]. Group 3: Communication and Decision-Making - The refined performance benchmarks serve as a communication bridge between investors and fund managers, clarifying investment strategies and measuring product performance [5][6]. - The trend towards detailed benchmarks indicates a cognitive evolution in asset allocation concepts within the asset management industry, with a focus on transitioning from "selection experts" to "multi-asset allocation experts" [6]. Group 4: Future Implications - The introduction of multi-asset strategies is expected to transform performance benchmarks from passive references to active guides, becoming integral to the entire product lifecycle management [6]. - The detailed benchmarks will help delineate product risk characteristics, shifting investment goals from return-oriented to risk-adjusted matching [6].

Core Viewpoint - The public fund industry is increasingly focusing on the detailed construction of performance benchmarks for investment, reflecting a shift in investment philosophy from selection to multi-asset allocation [1][6]. Group 1: Performance Benchmark Composition - Recent multi-asset products have performance benchmarks that are more complex, involving up to six asset classes, including A-shares, bonds, US stocks, Hong Kong stocks, commodities, and deposits [2][3]. - The newly launched FOF products have benchmarks composed of at least four asset classes, indicating a significant refinement compared to previous simpler stock-bond combinations [2][3]. - The "Yongying Yuan Ying Stable Multi-Asset 90-Day Holding" fund has a benchmark consisting of six asset classes, with 70% in bonds, 10% in A-shares, 5% in US stocks, 5% in Hong Kong stocks, 5% in commodities, and 5% in deposits [2]. Group 2: Investment Strategy and Transparency - The detailed breakdown of performance benchmarks allows for a more accurate reflection of the investment logic of "fixed income as a base, equity as an enhancement, and alternatives as a supplement" [4]. - Clear asset composition enhances product transparency, helping investors understand risk sources and return drivers, thereby establishing reasonable expectations [4]. - The diversification of benchmarks helps to strengthen investment discipline, requiring fund managers to adopt systematic and process-oriented multi-asset research and decision-making mechanisms [4]. Group 3: Communication and Market Trends - A refined performance benchmark serves as a communication bridge between investors and fund companies, clarifying investment strategies, representing investment styles, measuring product performance, and constraining investment behavior [5]. - Approximately one-third of the over 3,600 FOF and "fixed income+" funds in the market have performance benchmarks composed of at least three parts, indicating a trend towards the refinement of benchmarks in the asset management industry [7]. - The industry is transitioning from a traditional stock-bond binary model to a more diversified and global asset allocation system, recognizing the need for a more complex approach to adapt to changing macroeconomic environments [7].