Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for algorithms and online platforms to genuinely serve farmers by supporting real agricultural experts and punishing fake ones [1][3]. Group 1: Issues with Fake Experts - Fake agricultural experts are exploiting farmers by presenting themselves as knowledgeable while lacking any real agricultural education [1][2]. - These individuals use deceptive marketing tactics, making exaggerated claims about their products and services, which leads to significant financial losses for farmers [2]. - The prevalence of fake experts highlights the demand for genuine agricultural technology services among farmers, who are seeking reliable guidance [2]. Group 2: Recommendations for Improvement - There is a call for platforms to increase support for authentic agricultural experts and assist them in reaching a wider audience [3]. - The agricultural technology promotion system needs to adapt to modern trends, enhancing its effectiveness and reach through digital means [3]. - A comprehensive approach is suggested to combat counterfeit agricultural products and establish a quality traceability system to purify the market environment [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for algorithms and online platforms to genuinely serve farmers by supporting real agricultural experts and punishing fake ones, highlighting the prevalence of fraudulent agricultural advisors targeting farmers' finances [1][2][3]. Group 1: Characteristics of Fake Experts - Fake agricultural experts exhibit three main characteristics: exaggerating promises, ambiguous identities, and identical promotional content across multiple accounts [2]. - These fraudulent practices not only lead to financial losses for farmers but also jeopardize their annual harvests [2]. Group 2: Demand for Genuine Agricultural Services - There is a significant demand among farmers for effective agricultural technology services, which are currently insufficient and disconnected from their actual needs [2]. - The article calls for genuine agricultural experts to engage more actively in providing guidance, both online and in-person, to meet farmers' needs [2]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - The evaluation system for agricultural colleges and institutions should be revised to recognize contributions to real agricultural services [3]. - Agricultural technology promotion systems need to adapt to modern trends, enhancing their effectiveness and reach, especially through mobile platforms [3]. Group 4: Combating Fraud and Ensuring Quality - There is a need to strengthen the crackdown on counterfeit agricultural products and establish a quality traceability system to purify the market environment [4]. - A collaborative effort is essential to ensure that farmers receive genuine assistance and guidance, ultimately contributing to rural revitalization [4].