曾在小红书晒出2350万美元（约合人民币1.67亿元）年薪的吴舰，正面临美国证券交易委 员会和美国司法部的民事刑事双重起诉。 近日，美国司法部表示，吴舰被指控犯有电汇欺诈、证券欺诈和洗钱罪。美国司法部还表 示，34岁的吴舰是一名居住在纽约的中国公民，目前处于在逃状态，无法立即确定他的律 师。 根据吴舰的Linkedin（领英）简介，他在2011年取得了清华大学的工学学士学位，并于 2017年从美国康奈尔大学获得了博士学位。 名校毕业的吴舰曾在美国知名做市商Citadel（城堡投资）实习，于2018年4月加入顶尖量 化对冲基金Two Sigma，从量化研究员做起，三年时间不到就升任Two Sigma量化研究部 的副总裁，2023年1月，工作不到五年的吴舰被提拔为高级副总裁。 美国证券交易委员会的起诉书称，在2021年11月至2023年8月期间，吴舰秘密操纵了他创 建或帮助创建的至少14个投资模型，吴舰向Two Sigma谎称这些模型正在生成独特的预 测，而事实上，吴舰对这些模型进行了未经授权和未披露的更改，导致它们有效地复制了其 他Two Sigma模型的预测（公司要求新的模型必须与已有的模型"不高度相关"）。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for algorithms and online platforms to genuinely serve farmers by supporting real agricultural experts and punishing fake ones, highlighting the prevalence of fraudulent agricultural advisors targeting farmers' finances [1][2][3]. Group 1: Characteristics of Fake Experts - Fake agricultural experts exhibit three main characteristics: exaggerating promises, ambiguous identities, and identical promotional content across multiple accounts [2]. - These fraudulent practices not only lead to financial losses for farmers but also jeopardize their annual harvests [2]. Group 2: Demand for Genuine Agricultural Services - There is a significant demand among farmers for effective agricultural technology services, which are currently insufficient and disconnected from their actual needs [2]. - The article calls for genuine agricultural experts to engage more actively in providing guidance, both online and in-person, to meet farmers' needs [2]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - The evaluation system for agricultural colleges and institutions should be revised to recognize contributions to real agricultural services [3]. - Agricultural technology promotion systems need to adapt to modern trends, enhancing their effectiveness and reach, especially through mobile platforms [3]. Group 4: Combating Fraud and Ensuring Quality - There is a need to strengthen the crackdown on counterfeit agricultural products and establish a quality traceability system to purify the market environment [4]. - A collaborative effort is essential to ensure that farmers receive genuine assistance and guidance, ultimately contributing to rural revitalization [4].

利用人工智能生成合成技术，仿冒他人，或编造社会民生等领域虚假信息，欺骗公众。通过剧情摆拍、 拼凑剪辑等方式，编造事件、虚构或夸大情节，引起关注。歪曲解读关乎公众利益的政策方针、法规文 件，宣扬"即将取消""重大变动"等不实信息，制造噱头。对往年社会新闻、政策发布等旧闻旧事摘头去 尾，掩盖时间、地点、结果等关键要素，恶意炒作。借助网络黑灰产等渠道，以刷榜打榜买榜方式，通 过热搜榜单呈现不实信息，操纵榜单。 不做标注以假乱真问题 对涉及国内外时事、公共政策、社会事件等相关信息，未标注或未准确标注信息来源。以"网传""网友 表示""来源于互联网"等方式发布信息，模糊标注信息来源，发布无实际依据内容。标注错误信息来 源，或矩阵账号互相引用标注，导致公众无法追溯真实来源。以过小字号、隐蔽位置、进度条遮挡等方 式标注，刻意弱化标注标识。 专业领域信息不实问题 中央网信办出手。 据网信中国，为持续深入整治"自媒体"发布不实信息乱象，进一步规范"自媒体"信息发布行为，按照 2025年"清朗"系列专项行动总体安排，中央网信办决定自7月24日起，在全国范围内启动为期2个月 的"清朗·整治'自媒体'发布不实信息"专项行动。 据悉， ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the launch of a two-month special action by the Central Cyberspace Administration of China to address the issue of misinformation spread by self-media, aiming to regulate information dissemination and enhance public trust [1]. Summary by Categories Key Issues Targeted - The special action focuses on four major issues: 1. Malicious hype and misleading public information, including impersonation of individuals during significant events and fabricating information in critical fields like finance and military [2]. 2. Distortion of facts through various means, such as using AI to create fake identities, manipulating narratives, and spreading false information about policies and events [3]. 3. Lack of proper source attribution, where information is shared without clear or accurate sourcing, leading to confusion and misinformation [4]. 4. Dissemination of false information in professional fields without proper certification, misrepresenting expertise, and creating misleading narratives [5].