"广州医保管理网"页面仿冒广州市医疗保障局官方视觉标识，涉嫌传播虚假信息、非法收集信息，扰乱 正常医保信息传播秩序。广州网信部门及时报请上级网信部门予以处置，目前该网站已被依法依规关 停。 典型案例三 转自：北京日报客户端 2025年以来，广州网信部门持续推进"清朗"系列专项行动，严厉打击各类网络乱象，根据网民举报线 索，依法依规处置了一批违法违规账号、网站。部分典型案例通报如下： 典型案例一 某APP"自媒体"账号通过仿造昵称"广l州l日l报"形式，假冒仿冒新闻媒体，其名称及部分发布内容具有 迷惑性，易误导公众。广州网信部门指导新闻媒体向中央网信办互联网违法和不良信息举报中心和相关 平台举报，目前该账号已依法依规完成整改。 典型案例二 有不法分子仿冒广州市质量检验研究院官网的"质量真伪查询页面"。经市区两级联合核查，该仿冒页面 涉嫌提供伪造的检测报告、冒用事业单位公章，严重扰乱市场秩序，损害该院社会公信力。广州网信部 门已依法报请上级网信部门对违规网页进行处置，目前该页面已被依法依规删除。 典型案例四 有网站仿冒"广州汽修中等职业学校"、"广州经济技术专修学院"等教育机构官网以及"广州期货交易 所"官网、 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of maintaining network security and order, highlighting recent actions taken against tax evasion and other violations in the internet industry, which contribute to a healthier online environment [1][2]. Group 1: Tax Evasion Case - Influential car reviewer Chen Zhen was found to have evaded taxes amounting to 1.1867 million yuan, leading to a total penalty of 2.4748 million yuan, including back taxes and fines [2]. - Chen Zhen's reported income was significantly lower than his actual earnings, raising concerns about the accuracy of income declarations among internet celebrities [2]. - The tax authorities have taken a firm stance against tax evasion in the internet sector, indicating that the online space cannot be a refuge for avoiding tax obligations [2]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The Central Cyberspace Administration of China reported that over 73,000 illegal live streaming rooms and 24,000 accounts have been dealt with as part of the "Clear and Bright" campaign [3]. - The campaign aims to address issues such as vulgar content and tax evasion, with a focus on improving the overall online ecosystem [3][4]. - The "Clear and Bright" series of actions has been ongoing since 2016, demonstrating a commitment to maintaining a clean online environment through coordinated efforts from multiple government departments [6]. Group 3: Network Ecology Improvement - The article notes that the network ecology has shown improvement, with ongoing efforts to strengthen the legal framework and governance mechanisms in the internet space [5][7]. - The Chinese government has enacted over 160 laws related to the internet, establishing a comprehensive legal system to support the development of a robust online environment [7]. - Future initiatives will focus on enhancing content management and establishing long-term governance mechanisms to ensure a positive online atmosphere [7].

（原标题：网红张雪峰、户晨风账号被处置详情披露） 专家认为，户晨风用这种大肆输出所谓"安卓人""苹果人"的做法，本质是通过制造尖锐对立议题、煽动 群体间情绪、贩卖焦虑，来吸引眼球和流量，最终目的是实现商业变现。 "宣扬扭曲价值观"乱象 编造标签，煽动群众对立；物欲横流，宣扬扭曲价值观；内容失格，污染网络环境；劣迹斑斑却试 图"换壳重生"。这几类乱象在当前的网络生态中尤为凸显。 12月3日，中央网信办集中通报了包括"户晨风""张雪峰""阑夕"等在内的一批网络名人账号违法违规处 置案例。此次行动因涉及多位头部网红而引发广泛关注。 中央网信办公布 网络名人账号违法违规案例 "煽动群众对立"乱象 网络账号"户晨风"在多个平台长期编造所谓"安卓人""苹果人"等煽动群体对立言论，各平台相关账号已 关闭。 安卓房子、苹果房子，从何而来？这是网红博主"户晨风"在网上发表的极端言论，在多个平台长期编造 所谓"安卓人""苹果人"等标签，人为制造并激化社会群体间的对立情绪。 实际上，从展示跨国消费差异到制造阶层对立，户晨风以"苹果、安卓论"收割流量，该账号因突破监管 红线被封禁，多平台账号被彻底注销。 为了博取眼球、吸引流量，户晨 ...

网络名人账号违法违规案例 "煽动群众对 立" 乱象 网络账号"户晨风"在多个平台长期编造所谓"安卓人""苹果人"等煽动群体对立言论，各平台相关账号已关闭。 12月3日，中央网信办集中通报了包括"户晨风""张雪峰""阑夕"等在内的一批网络名人账号违法违规处置案例。此次行动因涉及多位头部网红而引发广泛关注。 中 央网 信办公布 编造标签，煽动群众对立；物欲横流，宣扬扭曲价值观；内容失格，污染网络环境；劣迹斑斑却试图"换壳重生"。这几类乱象在当前的网络生态中尤为凸显。 安卓房子、苹果房子，从何而来？这是网红博主"户晨风"在网上发表的极端言论，在多个平台长期编造所谓"安卓人""苹果人"等标签，人为制造并激化社会群体间 的对立情绪。 实际上，从展示跨国消费差异到制造阶层对立，户晨风以"苹果、安卓论"收割流量，该账号因突破监管红线被封禁，多平台账号被彻底注销。 为了博取眼球、吸引流量，户晨风在他的视频和直播中构建了一套以"苹果/安卓"为核心的极端话语体系。 专家认为，户晨风用这种大肆输出所谓"安卓人""苹果人"的做法，本质是通过制造尖锐对立议题、煽动群体间情绪、贩卖焦虑，来吸引眼球和流量，最终目的是实 现商业变现。 "宣 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent incident involving the streamer "Lao Zhi Shu Dao San" imitating criminal Lao Rong Zhi has sparked public outrage, leading to the indefinite suspension of the account by the platform, highlighting the failure of sensationalism and curiosity-driven content creation [1] Group 1: Industry Trends - The phenomenon of "violent account creation" promotes the idea that success in gaining attention, regardless of morality, can lead to significant profits, thereby harming the overall creative ecosystem of the internet [2] - Content creators and MCN agencies are increasingly resorting to unethical practices, such as fabricating emotional narratives or showcasing extravagant lifestyles, to quickly monetize their content [1][2] Group 2: Regulatory Response - Regulatory bodies and platforms are actively addressing the trend of "violent account creation" through initiatives like the "Qinglang" series of special actions aimed at rectifying issues related to self-media chaos and malicious hype [3] - The rapid response from platforms to penalize violators demonstrates a commitment to maintaining a healthy online environment, with an increasing number of cases showcasing decisive action against rule-breaking streamers [3] Group 3: Public Awareness - There is a growing awareness among internet users regarding the tactics behind "toxic traffic," leading to improved reporting and complaint mechanisms that contribute to the purification of the online environment [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal troubles faced by Wu Jian, a high-earning employee at Two Sigma, who is accused of fraud and manipulation of investment models, leading to significant financial losses for clients and the firm [2][7]. Group 1: Background of Wu Jian - Wu Jian, a Chinese citizen residing in New York, has a notable educational background, having graduated from Tsinghua University and Cornell University [2]. - He worked at Citadel before joining Two Sigma in April 2018, where he quickly rose to the position of Senior Vice President by January 2023 [4]. Group 2: Allegations and Consequences - Wu Jian is facing civil and criminal charges from the U.S. Department of Justice for wire fraud, securities fraud, and money laundering [2]. - The SEC's indictment claims that from November 2021 to August 2023, Wu Jian secretly manipulated at least 14 investment models, misleading Two Sigma about their performance and leading to client losses of at least $165 million [7]. - Two Sigma's internal investigation was triggered by Wu Jian's ostentatious display of wealth on social media, which raised red flags within the firm [7]. Group 3: Financial Implications - Wu Jian reportedly earned a salary of $23.5 million in 2022, a significant increase compared to previous years, and used part of his earnings to purchase a multi-million dollar apartment in Manhattan [4][7]. - Two Sigma has canceled Wu Jian's $8 million performance bonuses for 2021 and 2022 but has not yet recovered the $17.8 million in cash bonuses he received during those years [8]. Group 4: Company Response - Two Sigma terminated Wu Jian's employment in 2024 and has taken steps to compensate affected clients for their losses [9].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for algorithms and online platforms to genuinely serve farmers by supporting real agricultural experts and punishing fake ones, highlighting the prevalence of fraudulent agricultural advisors targeting farmers' finances [1][2][3]. Group 1: Characteristics of Fake Experts - Fake agricultural experts exhibit three main characteristics: exaggerating promises, ambiguous identities, and identical promotional content across multiple accounts [2]. - These fraudulent practices not only lead to financial losses for farmers but also jeopardize their annual harvests [2]. Group 2: Demand for Genuine Agricultural Services - There is a significant demand among farmers for effective agricultural technology services, which are currently insufficient and disconnected from their actual needs [2]. - The article calls for genuine agricultural experts to engage more actively in providing guidance, both online and in-person, to meet farmers' needs [2]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - The evaluation system for agricultural colleges and institutions should be revised to recognize contributions to real agricultural services [3]. - Agricultural technology promotion systems need to adapt to modern trends, enhancing their effectiveness and reach, especially through mobile platforms [3]. Group 4: Combating Fraud and Ensuring Quality - There is a need to strengthen the crackdown on counterfeit agricultural products and establish a quality traceability system to purify the market environment [4]. - A collaborative effort is essential to ensure that farmers receive genuine assistance and guidance, ultimately contributing to rural revitalization [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Central Cyberspace Administration of China has launched a two-month special action to address the issue of false information dissemination by "self-media" starting from July 24, 2023, as part of the "Clear and Bright" series of initiatives aimed at regulating information release behavior [1]. Group 1: Key Issues Addressed - The action focuses on four major issues: maliciously exploiting public sentiment, using AI to distort facts, failing to properly label information sources, and disseminating false information in professional fields [1][2][3][4]. Group 2: Specific Problems Highlighted - Malicious exploitation includes impersonating individuals during significant public events to mislead the public and creating false narratives around critical incidents [1][2]. - The use of AI-generated content to fabricate social issues and manipulate public perception through edited or staged events is a significant concern [2]. - The lack of proper source attribution for news related to public policies and events leads to confusion and misinformation [3]. - In professional domains, the absence of credential verification and the spread of scientifically unverified information by impersonating experts are critical issues [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the launch of a two-month special action by the Central Cyberspace Administration of China to address the issue of misinformation spread by self-media, aiming to regulate information dissemination and enhance public trust [1]. Summary by Categories Key Issues Targeted - The special action focuses on four major issues: 1. Malicious hype and misleading public information, including impersonation of individuals during significant events and fabricating information in critical fields like finance and military [2]. 2. Distortion of facts through various means, such as using AI to create fake identities, manipulating narratives, and spreading false information about policies and events [3]. 3. Lack of proper source attribution, where information is shared without clear or accurate sourcing, leading to confusion and misinformation [4]. 4. Dissemination of false information in professional fields without proper certification, misrepresenting expertise, and creating misleading narratives [5].