清朗系列专项行动
Search documents
卖惨、炫富、装罪犯……邪路“起号”必然见光死
Bei Jing Ri Bao Ke Hu Duan· 2025-11-08 10:14
数字时代日新月异,但人们对真善美的渴求永远不会消失。为流量天平与算法逻辑注入价值观,为 真实、合法、健康的创作护航,推动"良币驱逐劣币",网络空间才可能天清气朗。 【责任编辑:张胶】 "暴力起号"不仅假恶丑,更宣扬了无论是非善恶,只要"起号"成功,就能大赚特赚,还能通过删除 相关虚假视频"洗白",进入"头部博主"行列。"劣币驱逐良币",毒害的是整个互联网的创作生态。此 外,"暴力起号"的秘诀就是故意挑动敏感话题,制造对立撕裂,在争吵和"骂战"中收割关注。在情 绪"燃点"较低的互联网,婆媳矛盾、男女对立、饭圈互撕等等类似的剧本大行其道,在人与人之间挑拨 种刺,消解公共讨论的理性空间,加剧着社交平台的情绪化、极端化。 网络空间绝非法外之地,流量更不能成为突破底线的挡箭牌。面对"暴力起号"之风,监管部门和平 台方的主动亮剑与联合围剿,是净化网络生态的必然要求。近年来,从中央网信办部署开展"清朗"系列 专项行动,重拳整治自媒体乱象、网络水军、恶意炒作等问题,到各大平台不断升级社区公约、强化内 容审核、建立负面清单,一张覆盖监管端与平台端的治理大网正越织越密。随着社会共识的不断凝聚, 我们欣喜地看到,相关平台对违规主播 ...
“不敢发朋友圈”,清华学霸小红书晒1.67亿元年薪引调查!美国司法部:他处于在逃状态
新浪财经· 2025-09-17 09:13
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal troubles faced by Wu Jian, a high-earning employee at Two Sigma, who is accused of fraud and manipulation of investment models, leading to significant financial losses for clients and the firm [2][7]. Group 1: Background of Wu Jian - Wu Jian, a Chinese citizen residing in New York, has a notable educational background, having graduated from Tsinghua University and Cornell University [2]. - He worked at Citadel before joining Two Sigma in April 2018, where he quickly rose to the position of Senior Vice President by January 2023 [4]. Group 2: Allegations and Consequences - Wu Jian is facing civil and criminal charges from the U.S. Department of Justice for wire fraud, securities fraud, and money laundering [2]. - The SEC's indictment claims that from November 2021 to August 2023, Wu Jian secretly manipulated at least 14 investment models, misleading Two Sigma about their performance and leading to client losses of at least $165 million [7]. - Two Sigma's internal investigation was triggered by Wu Jian's ostentatious display of wealth on social media, which raised red flags within the firm [7]. Group 3: Financial Implications - Wu Jian reportedly earned a salary of $23.5 million in 2022, a significant increase compared to previous years, and used part of his earnings to purchase a multi-million dollar apartment in Manhattan [4][7]. - Two Sigma has canceled Wu Jian's $8 million performance bonuses for 2021 and 2022 but has not yet recovered the $17.8 million in cash bonuses he received during those years [8]. Group 4: Company Response - Two Sigma terminated Wu Jian's employment in 2024 and has taken steps to compensate affected clients for their losses [9].
对付假专家须打出组合拳
Jing Ji Ri Bao· 2025-08-18 21:17
Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for algorithms and online platforms to genuinely serve farmers by supporting real agricultural experts and punishing fake ones, highlighting the prevalence of fraudulent agricultural advisors targeting farmers' finances [1][2][3]. Group 1: Characteristics of Fake Experts - Fake agricultural experts exhibit three main characteristics: exaggerating promises, ambiguous identities, and identical promotional content across multiple accounts [2]. - These fraudulent practices not only lead to financial losses for farmers but also jeopardize their annual harvests [2]. Group 2: Demand for Genuine Agricultural Services - There is a significant demand among farmers for effective agricultural technology services, which are currently insufficient and disconnected from their actual needs [2]. - The article calls for genuine agricultural experts to engage more actively in providing guidance, both online and in-person, to meet farmers' needs [2]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - The evaluation system for agricultural colleges and institutions should be revised to recognize contributions to real agricultural services [3]. - Agricultural technology promotion systems need to adapt to modern trends, enhancing their effectiveness and reach, especially through mobile platforms [3]. Group 4: Combating Fraud and Ensuring Quality - There is a need to strengthen the crackdown on counterfeit agricultural products and establish a quality traceability system to purify the market environment [4]. - A collaborative effort is essential to ensure that farmers receive genuine assistance and guidance, ultimately contributing to rural revitalization [4].
网信办出手!针对“自媒体”发布不实信息乱象
Zheng Quan Shi Bao· 2025-07-29 09:55
利用人工智能生成合成技术,仿冒他人,或编造社会民生等领域虚假信息,欺骗公众。通过剧情摆拍、 拼凑剪辑等方式,编造事件、虚构或夸大情节,引起关注。歪曲解读关乎公众利益的政策方针、法规文 件,宣扬"即将取消""重大变动"等不实信息,制造噱头。对往年社会新闻、政策发布等旧闻旧事摘头去 尾,掩盖时间、地点、结果等关键要素,恶意炒作。借助网络黑灰产等渠道,以刷榜打榜买榜方式,通 过热搜榜单呈现不实信息,操纵榜单。 不做标注以假乱真问题 对涉及国内外时事、公共政策、社会事件等相关信息,未标注或未准确标注信息来源。以"网传""网友 表示""来源于互联网"等方式发布信息,模糊标注信息来源,发布无实际依据内容。标注错误信息来 源,或矩阵账号互相引用标注,导致公众无法追溯真实来源。以过小字号、隐蔽位置、进度条遮挡等方 式标注,刻意弱化标注标识。 专业领域信息不实问题 中央网信办出手。 据网信中国,为持续深入整治"自媒体"发布不实信息乱象,进一步规范"自媒体"信息发布行为,按照 2025年"清朗"系列专项行动总体安排,中央网信办决定自7月24日起,在全国范围内启动为期2个月 的"清朗·整治'自媒体'发布不实信息"专项行动。 据悉, ...
网信办出手!针对“自媒体”发布不实信息乱象
证券时报· 2025-07-29 09:15
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the launch of a two-month special action by the Central Cyberspace Administration of China to address the issue of misinformation spread by self-media, aiming to regulate information dissemination and enhance public trust [1]. Summary by Categories Key Issues Targeted - The special action focuses on four major issues: 1. Malicious hype and misleading public information, including impersonation of individuals during significant events and fabricating information in critical fields like finance and military [2]. 2. Distortion of facts through various means, such as using AI to create fake identities, manipulating narratives, and spreading false information about policies and events [3]. 3. Lack of proper source attribution, where information is shared without clear or accurate sourcing, leading to confusion and misinformation [4]. 4. Dissemination of false information in professional fields without proper certification, misrepresenting expertise, and creating misleading narratives [5].