Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the poor performance of actively managed equity funds established in 2021, with over 50% of them still showing negative returns despite the A-share market recovering above 4000 points [1]. Fund Performance Summary - A total of 667 actively managed equity funds established in 2021 were analyzed, revealing that approximately 362 funds have negative returns since inception, accounting for over 50% of the sample [1]. - Among these, 86 funds have experienced declines of over 30%, and 34 funds have seen declines exceeding 40% [1]. - Specific funds such as Qianhai Kaiyuan Public Health Theme Select and others have reported losses greater than 50% since their inception [1]. Specific Fund Data - Qianhai Kaiyuan Public Health Stock A/C, established on March 25, 2021, has a return of -57.80% and -58.60% as of February 5, 2026, with a cumulative loss nearing 60% [2]. - The fund's top ten holdings include companies like Tigermed, WuXi AppTec, and BeiGene [1]. - Qianhai Kaiyuan Public Health Stock A/C has a scale of 0.83 billion yuan as of December 31, 2025 [2]. Additional Fund Performance - Qianhai Kaiyuan Quality Enterprises 6-Month Holding Mixed A/C, established on January 8, 2021, has cumulative returns of -40.78% and -43.14% [3]. - The fund's top holdings include major companies such as Tencent and Alibaba, but its performance has been subpar since 2026 [4].

Core Viewpoint - Hunan Gold has experienced a decline for four consecutive trading days, with a cumulative drop of -4.98% [1] Company Overview - Hunan Gold Co., Ltd. was established on December 25, 2000, as Hunan Chenzhou Mining Co., Ltd. and was listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange on August 16, 2007 [1] - The company changed its name to Hunan Gold Co., Ltd. on May 18, 2015, while retaining the stock code "002155" [1] Shareholder Activity - Four funds under Qianhai Kaiyuan Fund have entered the top ten shareholders of Hunan Gold, all of which reduced their holdings in the first quarter of this year [1] - The funds include Qianhai Kaiyuan Hong Kong-Shenzhen Advantage Selection Mixed A, Qianhai Kaiyuan Quality Enterprises 6-Month Holding Mixed A, Qianhai Kaiyuan China Scarce Assets Mixed A, and Qianhai Kaiyuan National Comparative Advantage Mixed A [1] Fund Performance - Qianhai Kaiyuan Hong Kong-Shenzhen Advantage Selection Mixed A has a year-to-date return of 2.80%, ranking 663 out of 2306 in its category [1] - Qianhai Kaiyuan Quality Enterprises 6-Month Holding Mixed A has a year-to-date return of 2.02%, ranking 2143 out of 4538 [1] - Qianhai Kaiyuan China Scarce Assets Mixed A has a year-to-date return of -6.12%, ranking 2088 out of 2306 [1] - Qianhai Kaiyuan National Comparative Advantage Mixed A has a year-to-date return of -6.02%, ranking 2082 out of 2306 [1] Fund Manager Profile - The fund manager for the aforementioned funds is Qu Yang, who holds a Ph.D. in engineering from Tsinghua University and has been with Qianhai Kaiyuan Fund Management Co., Ltd. since July 2014 [6][8] - Qu Yang has extensive experience in fund management, having previously worked with Southern Fund and managed various funds over the years [6][8]

Group 1 - Hunan Gold has experienced a continuous decline for six trading days, with a cumulative drop of -15.05% [1] - The company was established as Hunan Chenzhou Mining Co., Ltd. on December 25, 2000, and was listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange on August 16, 2007 [1] - Four funds under Qianhai Kaiyuan Fund have entered the top ten shareholders of Hunan Gold, all of which have reduced their holdings in the first quarter of this year [1] Group 2 - The performance of Qianhai Kaiyuan funds shows negative returns, with Qianhai Kaiyuan Hong Kong and Shanghai Advantage Selection Mixed A yielding -0.14% this year, ranking 1049 out of 2307 [1] - Other funds under Qianhai Kaiyuan also reported negative returns, with Qianhai Kaiyuan Quality Enterprises Mixed A at -0.67%, Qianhai Kaiyuan China Scarce Assets Mixed A at -5.86%, and Qianhai Kaiyuan National Comparative Advantage Mixed A at -5.76% [1] - The average performance of similar funds and the CSI 300 index also reflects negative trends, indicating a challenging market environment [3]