Core Viewpoint - The audit report from Shenzhen highlights the issue of idle and wasted large scientific research instruments, recommending enhanced sharing mechanisms to improve utilization and efficiency [2][5]. Group 1: Audit Findings - The Shenzhen Municipal Audit Bureau conducted a performance audit on two Sino-foreign cooperative universities and six basic research institutions, focusing on the open sharing and usage of large scientific instruments [2]. - As of the end of 2024, the two universities possessed 212 large scientific instruments valued at 280 million yuan, while the six research institutions had 391 instruments valued at 842 million yuan [2][3]. - The audit revealed deficiencies in the open sharing system, with low sharing rates and inefficient use of instruments leading to waste [3][4]. Group 2: Specific Issues Identified - The open sharing system is not well-established, with one university lacking regulations and another institution failing to implement internal management systems for sharing [3]. - A significant number of instruments were not registered on the municipal sharing platform in a timely manner, with 99.4% of 165 devices at one university exceeding registration deadlines by an average of 307.96 days [3]. - In 2024, one university had 61.83% of its instruments used below the required hours, with some instruments remaining unused for over a year, leading to substantial idle time and asset value loss [4]. Group 3: Recommendations - The audit suggests that relevant authorities should urge institutions and universities to enhance the management of large scientific instruments, establish regulations, and improve information dissemination to increase sharing and usage efficiency [5].

Core Insights - The Ministry of Science and Technology released a notification regarding the evaluation results of major scientific research infrastructure and large scientific instruments in central-level universities and research institutes, indicating an increased emphasis on open sharing compared to 2024 [1] Group 1: Evaluation Results - 50 units, including the Institute of Biophysics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, received an "excellent" rating for their management systems, operational efficiency, and effectiveness in open sharing [1] - 100 units, such as the Subtropical Agricultural Ecology Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, were rated "good" for having relatively sound management systems and high operational efficiency [1] - 191 units, including the Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, met the basic requirements for open sharing and received a "qualified" rating [1] Group 2: Areas of Concern - 3 units, including the Fifth Research Institute of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, were rated "poor" due to inadequate implementation of open sharing responsibilities, incomplete management systems, lack of effective regulations, and low utilization rates of general instruments [1] Group 3: Instrument and Infrastructure Statistics - The average effective working hours for the evaluated scientific instruments was 1,599 hours per year, with a 100% integration rate into the national network management platform [2] - The average external service hours for these instruments was 273 hours per year, indicating a good operational and open sharing status [2] - The 71 major scientific research infrastructures demonstrated significant achievements in supporting national research tasks and promoting industrial technological innovation [2] Group 4: Incentives and Penalties - Units rated "excellent" and "good" will receive recognition and supplementary funding rewards, while those rated "poor" will face public criticism and a one-year deadline for rectification [2] - Failure to rectify issues within the stipulated time will result in a reduction of corresponding funding for the purchase of instruments and equipment [2]

Core Viewpoint - The "Management Measures for Open Sharing of Major Scientific Research Infrastructure and Large Scientific Instruments in Sichuan Province" aims to enhance the efficiency of scientific resource utilization and promote technological innovation and achievement transformation through open sharing of research facilities and instruments [1][2]. Group 1: Definition and Scope - Major scientific research infrastructure and large scientific instruments refer to facilities and equipment valued at 500,000 yuan or more, funded by public finance or state-owned capital, which are used for scientific research and technological development [2]. - The management units are responsible for the open sharing of these facilities and instruments, including the establishment of relevant systems and the operation of the sharing platform [2]. Group 2: Platform and Service Requirements - Management units are required to integrate their research facilities into the Sichuan Provincial Large Instrument Sharing Platform, ensuring standardized management and transparency in service offerings [3]. - Open sharing services can charge fees based on cost recovery and non-profit principles, with revenue contributing to performance-based salary funding for technical and administrative staff [3]. Group 3: Performance Evaluation and Accountability - An annual assessment will be conducted, rewarding "excellent" management units with preferential treatment in project applications and penalties for "unsatisfactory" units, including public notification and mandated corrections [4]. - Failure to comply with sharing obligations may result in corrective actions and penalties for responsible personnel [4].