全文如下： 科技部办公厅 财政部办公厅关于发布2025年中央级高校和科研院所等单位重大科研基础设施和大型科研仪器开放共享评价考核结果的通知 各有关部门科技主管单位： 摘要 ：考核共有26个部门344家单位参加评价考核，涉及原值50万元以上科研仪器共计5.3万台（套），重大科研基础设施71个。与2024年相比，参评单位对开 放共享更加重视，管理和共享应用水平进一步提升。 特别提示 微信机制调整，点击顶部"仪器信息网" → 右上方"…" → 设为 ★ 星标，否则很可能无法看到我们的推送。 近日，科技部官网发布《2025年中央级高校和科研院所等单位重大科研基础设施和大型科研仪器开放共享评价考核结果的通知》（以下简称 《通知》）。考核结果显示，与2024年相比，参评单位对开放共享更加重 视，管 理和共享应用水平进一步提升。 《通知》表示， 考核共有 26个部门344家单位参加评价考核，涉及原值50万元以上科研仪器共计5.3万台（套），重大科研基础设施71个 。 中国科学院生物物理研究所等50个单位管理制度规范、科研仪器设备运行使用效率高、对外开放共享成效明显，考核结果为优秀。 中国科学 院亚热带农业生态研究所等100 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the evaluation and assessment of the open sharing of major scientific research infrastructure and large scientific instruments in central-level higher education institutions and research institutes for the year 2024, as mandated by the Ministry of Science and Technology and the Ministry of Finance [2][4]. Group 1: Evaluation Purpose - The evaluation aims to implement the State Council's opinions on the open sharing of major scientific research infrastructure and large scientific instruments, enhancing the efficiency of scientific resource allocation and usage [4]. - The results of the evaluation will determine financial support for well-performing units and may lead to penalties for poorly performing units, including public notification and funding reductions [3][4]. Group 2: Evaluation Scope - The evaluation covers central-level higher education institutions and research institutes, focusing on their major scientific research infrastructure and large scientific instruments valued over 500,000 yuan for the year 2024 [5]. - Units that received poor evaluations in 2023 have completed rectifications and will participate in this assessment, while those still under rectification will not be included [5]. Group 3: Evaluation Content - **Organizational Management**: This includes the overall management of scientific instruments, integration into the national network management platform, and the accuracy of shared information [6][11]. - **Operational Usage**: This assesses the overall usage of instruments that should be open and their support for major scientific tasks [7][12]. - **Shared Service Effectiveness**: This evaluates the provision of shared services to external units, particularly in supporting major technological innovations and the needs of small and medium enterprises [7][14]. Group 4: Requirements - Relevant departments must ensure proper organization and oversight of the evaluation process, including the verification of submitted data and annual reports [8]. - Participating units are required to summarize and evaluate their open sharing status and submit reports by specified deadlines [8][9]. - The evaluation will include random checks to verify data accuracy, with penalties for any fraudulent reporting [8].

Core Viewpoint - The "Management Measures for Open Sharing of Major Scientific Research Infrastructure and Large Scientific Instruments in Sichuan Province" aims to enhance the efficiency of scientific resource utilization and promote technological innovation and achievement transformation through open sharing of research facilities and instruments [1][2]. Group 1: Definition and Scope - Major scientific research infrastructure and large scientific instruments refer to facilities and equipment valued at 500,000 yuan or more, funded by public finance or state-owned capital, which are used for scientific research and technological development [2]. - The management units are responsible for the open sharing of these facilities and instruments, including the establishment of relevant systems and the operation of the sharing platform [2]. Group 2: Platform and Service Requirements - Management units are required to integrate their research facilities into the Sichuan Provincial Large Instrument Sharing Platform, ensuring standardized management and transparency in service offerings [3]. - Open sharing services can charge fees based on cost recovery and non-profit principles, with revenue contributing to performance-based salary funding for technical and administrative staff [3]. Group 3: Performance Evaluation and Accountability - An annual assessment will be conducted, rewarding "excellent" management units with preferential treatment in project applications and penalties for "unsatisfactory" units, including public notification and mandated corrections [4]. - Failure to comply with sharing obligations may result in corrective actions and penalties for responsible personnel [4].