Core Viewpoint - The public fund industry in China is transitioning into a "post-star era" as several prominent fund managers have left their positions, leading to a re-evaluation of the traditional belief that "buying a fund means buying the fund manager" [1][2] Group 1: Departure of Star Fund Managers - A total of 247 fund managers have left their positions in 2023, compared to 216, 190, 187, 199, and 168 in the previous five years [2] - The departure of star fund managers often results in significant redemptions from their associated funds, as investor interest is closely tied to individual managers [2] - For instance, a fund manager who left in July 2024 saw the total assets of their five managed funds drop from over 14 billion to around 8 billion, a decrease of over 40% [2] Group 2: Industry Transformation Strategies - The public fund industry is exploring multiple strategies to adapt to the "post-star era," including industrialization and platformization of research, multi-manager systems, and a shift towards index-based products [4][5] - The China Securities Regulatory Commission has encouraged fund companies to strengthen their resources and develop a platform-based, integrated research system [4] Group 3: Multi-Manager Approach - The trend of replacing single fund managers with multi-manager teams is gaining traction, as it allows for diversified strategies and reduces reliance on individual performance [7][10] - Successful examples of this approach include the collaboration of multiple fund managers in managing products, which has shown superior performance compared to traditional single-manager funds [8][9] Group 4: Shift in Investment Philosophy - The traditional investment philosophy of "choosing funds means choosing people" is being challenged, with a focus now on the overall strength of the investment team and the research capabilities of the fund company [11][12] - Investors are encouraged to consider the collective expertise of the team and the company's support systems rather than solely relying on the reputation of individual fund managers [12]

忍不住再说说固收 +。 很多人不理解为啥经常叨唠固收+，因为从长期收益角度看，股票＞债券，固收+受限于权益部分仓位，预期 收益率应该要低于股基，但是朋友们，在实操中，固收+很多时候能做出意想不到的效果。 我拿偏股基金和偏债基金来举例，截至5月9号收盘，固收+的代表作——偏债混合型基金，近3年、近5年、 近10年平均收益都跑赢了偏股基金，只拉长到15年的时候，偏股基金才展现出来优势。 数 据 来源：choice，截至2025.5.9 但是，如果把投资者的体验考虑进去，那感觉就完全不一样了。那么对于那些不愿意承担太大波动，同时还想 要在权益市场分一杯羹、愿意拉长期限的投资者来说，固收+确实是很合适的品种啊。 一、一只被我多次提到的固收+ 我之前也写过，现在市面上固收+已经进化到3.0版本，策略丰富多样，而且整体表现也是越来越好，真的能 满足大部分投资者需求。 但除了策略外，我也很重视做固收+基金经理是否对投资者有同理心，这一领域，盛震山应该是做的很好的基 金经理之一。 盛震山是2019年去工银瑞信基金的，刚去的时候不是管理公募，是做了几年专户, 先后接触了包括保险、企业 客户、银行理财子等各种类型的专业机构客户， ...

来源：微信公众号 硬核姬老板 忍不住再说说固收+。 很多人不理解为啥经常叨唠固收+，因为从长期收益角度看，股票＞债券，固收+受限于权益部分仓位，预期收益率应该要低于股基，但是朋友们，在实操中，固收+很多时候 能做出意想不到的效果。 我拿偏股基金和偏债基金来举例，截至5月9号收盘，固收+的代表作——偏债混合型基金，近3年、近5年、近10年平均收益都跑赢了偏股基金，只拉长到15年的时候，偏股基金 才展现出来优势。 | | 近3年 | 近5年 | 近10年 | 近15年 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 偏债混合型基金 | 5.71% | 19.54% | 57.48% | 135.67% | | 偏股混合型基金 | -6.54% | 13.77% | 202公众号·硬栈她老板 | | 数据来源：choice，截至2025.5.9 但是，如果把投资者的体验考虑进去，那感觉就完全不一样了。那么对于那些不愿意承担太大波动，同时还想要在权益市场分一杯羹、愿意拉长期限的投资者来说，固收+确实 是很合适的品种啊。 一、一只被我多次提到的固收+ 我之前也写过，现在市面上固收+已经进化到3. ...