本报（chinatimes.net.cn）记者张玫 北京报道 当大多数人沉浸在国庆中秋双节假期的休闲时光时，基金行业的人事调整仍在继续。10月1日，广发基 金管理有限公司（下称"广发基金"）密集发布四则基金经理变更公告。 广发基金在公告中宣布，旗下广发诚享混合型证券投资基金（下称"广发诚享混合"）、广发瑞锦一年定 期开放混合型证券投资基金（下称"广发瑞锦一年定开混合"）、广发睿杰精选混合型发起式证券投资基 金（下称"广发睿杰精选混合"）、广发兴诚混合型证券投资基金（下称"广发兴诚混合"）四只产品同步 完成经理调整，相关变更已在中国证券投资基金业协会完成登记并正式生效。 针对人事变动等相关问题，《华夏时报》记者10月9日向广发基金发送采访函，截至发稿，未收到回 复。 增聘为产品注入新投资思路 今年10月1日，广发基金发布一系列基金经理变更公告，宣布对旗下四只基金产品进行基金经理调整。 而广发瑞锦一年定开混合增聘双基金经理。曾质彬、叶帅履新，与现任基金经理唐晓斌形成"三剑客"共 管格局。曾质彬拥有9.3年证券从业经验，他于2016年7月加入广发基金，历任量化投资部研究员，量化 投资部、稳健策略部投资经理。叶帅证券 ...

Core Viewpoint - The A-share index has reached a new high of 3800 points, indicating a structural market characterized by significant divergence, with technology stocks led by AI continuing to rise while traditional sectors remain sluggish [1][4][9]. Group 1: Market Performance and Insights - The third quarter saw extreme structural differentiation in the market, aligning with the current economic fundamentals and interest rate environment [4][5]. - Despite the overall economic pressure, there are structural highlights driven by innovation, particularly in technology sectors [4][5]. - The market has transitioned from low volatility to increased fluctuations since September, suggesting a new critical phase [1][4]. Group 2: Future Market Outlook - The index's breakthrough of 3800 points reflects both internal and external factors, including China's strong global competitiveness in technology and abundant global liquidity [9][10]. - The sustainability of the market's upward trend depends on the transition from risk appetite to improvements in corporate earnings and further declines in interest rates [10][11]. - The potential for a market correction exists if lagging sectors do not begin to rise, indicating a need for careful monitoring of economic fundamentals [10][11]. Group 3: Investment Strategies and Style Shifts - The current extreme market differentiation may lead to a style shift, with potential beneficiaries being traditional cyclical sectors and those supported by stable growth policies [13][14]. - Historical patterns suggest that extreme differentiation often contains mean-reversion dynamics, increasing the likelihood of a style switch [13][14]. - Investment strategies should focus on identifying undervalued sectors and companies with recovery potential, while avoiding chasing high-flying stocks [13][14][15]. Group 4: Risks and Cautions - The current market environment presents heightened risks, particularly for sectors that have seen significant price increases, such as AI-related stocks [18][19]. - Investors should remain cautious, as rapid technological advancements in AI could lead to swift changes in market expectations and valuations [18][19]. - Maintaining a balanced approach and being prepared for potential corrections in overheated sectors is essential for managing investment risks [18][19][20]. Group 5: Advice for Investors - Investors who missed the recent market rally should focus on sectors that have not yet experienced significant gains, as these may present future opportunities [23][25]. - Emphasizing a long-term investment perspective and avoiding impulsive decisions based on short-term market movements is crucial [23][26]. - The importance of understanding one's investment capabilities and risk tolerance is highlighted, suggesting that professional management may be beneficial for those lacking confidence [26].

Core Viewpoint - The public fund industry in China is transitioning into a "post-star era" as several prominent fund managers have left their positions, leading to a re-evaluation of the traditional belief that "buying a fund means buying the fund manager" [1][2] Group 1: Departure of Star Fund Managers - A total of 247 fund managers have left their positions in 2023, compared to 216, 190, 187, 199, and 168 in the previous five years [2] - The departure of star fund managers often results in significant redemptions from their associated funds, as investor interest is closely tied to individual managers [2] - For instance, a fund manager who left in July 2024 saw the total assets of their five managed funds drop from over 14 billion to around 8 billion, a decrease of over 40% [2] Group 2: Industry Transformation Strategies - The public fund industry is exploring multiple strategies to adapt to the "post-star era," including industrialization and platformization of research, multi-manager systems, and a shift towards index-based products [4][5] - The China Securities Regulatory Commission has encouraged fund companies to strengthen their resources and develop a platform-based, integrated research system [4] Group 3: Multi-Manager Approach - The trend of replacing single fund managers with multi-manager teams is gaining traction, as it allows for diversified strategies and reduces reliance on individual performance [7][10] - Successful examples of this approach include the collaboration of multiple fund managers in managing products, which has shown superior performance compared to traditional single-manager funds [8][9] Group 4: Shift in Investment Philosophy - The traditional investment philosophy of "choosing funds means choosing people" is being challenged, with a focus now on the overall strength of the investment team and the research capabilities of the fund company [11][12] - Investors are encouraged to consider the collective expertise of the team and the company's support systems rather than solely relying on the reputation of individual fund managers [12]

Core Viewpoint - The public fund industry in China is transitioning into a "post-star era" as several prominent fund managers have left their positions, leading to a re-evaluation of the traditional belief that "buying a fund means buying the fund manager" [1][2] Group 1: Departure of Star Fund Managers - A significant number of well-known fund managers, including Zhai Xiangdong and Bao Wuke, have left their positions this year, with a total of 247 departures reported by mid-August, surpassing the numbers from previous years [1] - The departure of star fund managers often results in substantial redemptions from their associated funds, with one fund's total assets dropping from over 14 billion to around 8 billion, a decline of over 40% [2] - Fund companies are striving for a "soft landing" during these transitions by promoting their internally trained teams to manage funds, which has led to some funds achieving impressive returns despite the manager's departure [2][3] Group 2: Industry Transformation - The public fund industry is exploring three main transformation paths: industrialization and platformization of research, establishing multi-manager systems, and adjusting product structures towards indexation [3][4] - The China Securities Regulatory Commission has emphasized the need for fund companies to strengthen their research capabilities and support team management models to enhance competitiveness [3] - The shift from "star manager" reliance to a platform-based research approach is seen as essential for maintaining market competitiveness [4][5] Group 3: Multi-Manager Collaboration - The trend of replacing single-manager models with multi-manager collaboration is gaining traction, with several funds adopting this strategy to diversify management and reduce reliance on individual managers [6][7] - Successful examples of multi-manager collaboration have been observed in both domestic and international markets, indicating a potential for improved performance through shared decision-making [6][7] - The multi-manager model requires a robust system for collaboration and decision-making, which includes restructuring trading, valuation, and risk management systems [7] Group 4: Changing Investment Philosophy - The traditional investment philosophy of "choosing funds means choosing people" is being challenged, with a focus shifting towards the overall strength of the investment team and the research framework of the fund company [8][10] - Fund managers are increasingly valuing specialized expertise in specific sectors rather than seeking "all-rounder" managers, emphasizing the importance of systematic asset allocation [8][10] - The importance of finding capable leaders who can effectively manage teams and strategies is becoming more pronounced as the industry evolves [9][10]

Core Viewpoint - The appointment of Zhao Lei as a co-manager for the China Europe Medical Health Fund signifies a trend towards multi-manager collaboration in the pharmaceutical fund sector, enhancing management capabilities and investment strategies [2][4][6]. Group 1: Fund Management Changes - Zhao Lei has been appointed as a co-manager alongside Ge Lan for the China Europe Medical Health Mixed Fund, while Ge Lan will continue to manage other products independently [2][4]. - Zhao Lei has over 8 years of experience in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sector and has held various research roles before joining China Europe Fund in 2021 [4]. - As of the end of Q1 this year, Ge Lan managed three funds with a total scale of 404.47 billion yuan, with the China Europe Medical Health Fund achieving a net value growth rate of 8.30% in the first half of the year, outperforming the CSI Pharmaceutical Index by 6.03% [4]. Group 2: Performance Metrics - The China Europe Medical Innovation Fund, also managed by Ge Lan, reported a 32.25% growth in the last six months, with an excess return of 26.8% compared to its benchmark, ranking in the top 4% of its category [5]. - Over the past year, the same fund achieved a growth of 51.63%, with a 37.17% excess return relative to its benchmark, maintaining a top 4% ranking [5]. - The China Europe Index products, including the China Europe CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Innovative Drug Index, have also shown strong performance, with a 50.94% increase in the last six months, ranking in the top 1% of its category [5]. Group 3: Industry Trends - The trend of multi-manager collaboration is becoming a significant transformation direction in the public fund industry, with 666 products undergoing co-management appointments in the first half of the year [7]. - This collaborative model allows for better utilization of each manager's strengths, enhancing the risk-return profile of the investment portfolio [7]. - Regulatory bodies are promoting a shift towards team-based management structures, emphasizing the importance of building robust research capabilities and moving away from reliance on star fund managers [8]. Group 4: Company Strategy - China Europe Fund is focused on strengthening its research team and investment capabilities, with an average financial industry experience of 14 years among its active equity fund managers [8]. - The company aims to create a stable, expert research team that covers 39 niche areas through in-depth research, supporting its investment strategies [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the importance of a multi-manager co-management model in the asset management industry, particularly highlighting the "重阳S4" model adopted by 重阳投资, which emphasizes collaboration among multiple fund managers to enhance investment performance and mitigate risks [1][4]. Summary by Sections Introduction to "重阳S4" - "重阳S4" refers to a model where multiple fund managers jointly manage the same fund through a divided management approach, allowing each manager to operate independently within their designated segments [2][3]. Global Context and Historical Background - The multi-manager co-management model is prevalent among leading hedge funds globally, such as Bridgewater and Millennium, and was initially pioneered by Capital Group in the U.S. public fund sector in 1958 [2][4]. Development Trends in Private Equity - New or short-lived private equity funds often rely on a single fund manager or CIO, but for long-term success, firms must transition to a sustainable and replicable model, with the multi-manager approach being a proven strategy [3][4]. Adoption of the Model in China - 重阳投资 is noted as one of the first private equity firms in China to implement the multi-manager co-management model, adapting to industry trends and leveraging its early establishment and talent development [4][5]. Key Elements of the "重阳S4" Model - The successful implementation of the co-management model requires four essential elements: top talent (Swordsman), effective collaboration (Synergy), a robust system (System), and excellent performance (Superiority) [5][6]. Talent Development - Fund managers in the co-management model are highly qualified, having undergone rigorous training for approximately ten years, which is crucial for the model's success [6][9]. Collaboration Mechanisms - Effective collaboration among fund managers is facilitated by shared investment philosophies, trust, and long-term working relationships, creating a synergistic effect [6][9]. Systematic Support - A comprehensive system supports the co-management model, including a structured talent development process, investment decision-making frameworks, and robust IT systems for operational efficiency [9][10]. Future Outlook - 重阳投资 aims to continue evolving its co-management model and anticipates that more private equity firms will adopt similar structures in the coming years, contributing to the industry's growth [11].

Core Viewpoint - The departure of fund manager Fan Kun from Rongtong Fund has raised concerns about the stability of the company's investment research system, especially given her previous success in managing funds with significant returns [2][7]. Group 1: Fund Manager Transition - Fan Kun has taken maternity leave and will be succeeded by other fund managers, including Liu Ankun, Wang Chao, Li Wenhai, and Ren Tao, who are expected to ensure a smooth transition of investment strategies [2][4]. - The transition process has been gradual, with Fan Kun having begun to step back from core products since June 2024, indicating a systematic handover rather than an abrupt departure [4][5]. Group 2: Performance Metrics - Under Fan Kun's management, the Rongtong Domestic Demand Driven Fund achieved a return rate of 99.77% and an annualized return of 14.13% by April 30, 2025, significantly outperforming the CSI 300 index and peer funds [3][5]. - However, the fund faced challenges in the past year, with a loss of 6.07% in 2024 and a further decline of 3.76% in the first quarter of 2025, leading to a reduction in assets from 3.778 billion yuan at the end of 2023 to 846 million yuan by the end of the first quarter of 2025 [3][7]. Group 3: Company Overview - Rongtong Fund, established in May 2001, has seen its asset management scale exceed 320 billion yuan, reaching 324.3 billion yuan by the end of the first quarter of 2025, with public fund management at 148.3 billion yuan and separate account management at 176 billion yuan [6]. - The company has focused on serving state-owned capital operations and has developed several index products, including the Rongtong CSI Chengtong State-Owned Enterprise Dividend ETF [6]. Group 4: Market Implications - The departure of a star fund manager like Fan Kun often leads to redemption pressures, and maintaining investor confidence through collaborative research and investment team efforts will be crucial for Rongtong Fund moving forward [7]. - The public fund industry is shifting from reliance on star managers to a more team-based approach, with many leading firms adopting a multi-manager model to mitigate the impact of individual manager changes [7].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the successful implementation of a multi-fund manager system at Star Stone Investment, which has matured over 18 years, leading to stable and superior investment performance [1][2][3]. Group 1: Multi-Fund Manager System - Star Stone's multi-fund manager system is considered the most thorough in the industry, resembling the "decentralization" approach of Capital Group, focusing on long-term team development and maintaining a unified investment language [2][3]. - The system allows each fund manager to make independent decisions under a unified investment methodology, with performance-based dynamic allocation of decision-making power [3][19]. - The average tenure of the six participating fund managers exceeds 16 years, showcasing remarkable stability in the team [1][19]. Group 2: Investment Philosophy - The investment approach is described as "stable but not rigid," utilizing a multi-layered driving factor framework that encompasses macro, industry, and company levels [5][35]. - The focus is on identifying changes and value increments in companies, with a strong emphasis on collaborative learning and sharing investment ideas among fund managers [5][30]. - The investment philosophy has evolved to include valuation standards, particularly the PEG ratio, to avoid speculative bubbles [39][40]. Group 3: Organizational Culture - Star Stone fosters an "academy-style" culture that emphasizes long-term development and rigorous evaluation, with a mentorship system in place for knowledge transfer [6][7][8]. - The company prioritizes client experience, with over 80% of clients coming from bank channels, ensuring that the product design aligns with client needs and risk preferences [9][69]. - The organization maintains a non-terminating culture, focusing on nurturing talent rather than eliminating underperformers [7][48]. Group 4: Market Outlook - The company sees significant investment opportunities in domestic consumption, supported by macroeconomic indicators and historical patterns of economic recovery following periods of deflation [61][62]. - Key investment themes include consumer services, resilient consumer goods, innovative pharmaceuticals, and applications of AI technology [66][67]. - The company emphasizes a data-driven approach to investment decisions, relying on statistical analysis and market trends rather than intuition [62][63].